Time to reimbursement of novel anticancer drugs in Europe: a case study of seven European countries

被引:12
|
作者
Post, H. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Schutte, T. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van Oijen, M. G. H. [1 ,2 ]
van Laarhoven, H. W. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hollak, C. E. M. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Dept Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Canc Treatment & Qual Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Platform Medicijn voor de Maatschappij Med Soc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Dept Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Dept Oncol, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
anticancer medicines; drug access; inequality; reimbursement; regulatory approval; CLINICAL BENEFIT SCALE; ESMO-MAGNITUDE; CANCER DRUGS; DECISIONS; MEDICINES; THERAPIES; ACCESS; SPAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101208
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Time to reimbursement (TTR) of new anticancer medicines differs between countries and contributes to unequal access. We aimed to investigate TTR of new anticancer medicines and explore factors influencing the reimbursement process in seven high-income European countries. Materials and methods: We carried out a retrospective case study of anticancer medicines with European Union Market Access (EU-MA) and a positive Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use opinion from 2016 until 2021 with subsequent national reimbursement approval (NRA). The National Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and reimbursement websites of Germany, France, UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway and Switzerland were used to identify TTR, defined as time from EU-MA to NRA. Additionally, we investigated medication-, country-, indicationand pharma-related factors potentially influencing TTR. Results: Thirty-five medicines were identified for which TTR ranged from -81 days to 2320 days (median 407 days). At data cut-off, 16 (46%) were reimbursed in all seven countries. Overall, the shortest TTR was in Germany (median 3 days, all medicines reimbursed <5 days). The time limit for reimbursement of 180 days stated by the Council of European Communities after the EU-MA (EU Transparency Directive) was met for 100% of included medicines in Germany, 51% in France, 29% in the UK and the Netherlands, 14% in Switzerland, 6% in Norway and 3% in Belgium. The TTR was significantly different between countries (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with shorter TTR were higher gross domestic product (GDP), absence of a pre-assessment procedure and submission by a big pharmaceutical company. Conclusions: TTR of anticancer medicines varies significantly between seven high-income European countries and leads to inequality in access. Among explored medication-, country-, indication- and pharma-related factors we found that a high GDP, the absence of a pre-assessment procedure and submission by big pharmaceutical companies were associated with shorter TTR.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] An international comparative analysis of public reimbursement of orphan drugs in Canadian provinces compared to European countries
    Ward, Leanne Marie
    Chambers, Alexandra
    Mechichi, Emine
    Wong-Rieger, Durhane
    Campbell, Craig
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [12] HPV vaccine case study of seven countries
    不详
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2009, 17 (34) : 214 - 215
  • [13] Clinical and non-clinical aspects of reimbursement policy for orphan drugs in selected European countries
    Jakubowski, Szczepan
    Holko, Przemyslaw
    Nowak, Rafal
    Warmuth, Marisa
    Dooms, Marc
    Salminen, Outi
    Cortial, Lucas
    Selke, Gisbert W.
    Georgi, Christina
    Magnusson, Einar
    Crisafulli, Salvatore
    Strijbosch, Fons
    Mueller, Tanja
    Grieve, Eleanor
    Danes, Immaculada
    Kawalec, Pawel
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [14] An international comparative analysis of public reimbursement of orphan drugs in Canadian provinces compared to European countries
    Leanne Marie Ward
    Alexandra Chambers
    Emine Mechichi
    Durhane Wong-Rieger
    Craig Campbell
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 17
  • [15] Impact of the National Reimbursement Drug List Negotiation Policy on Accessibility of Anticancer Drugs in China: An Interrupted Time Series Study
    Zhu, Hong
    Zhu, Jingmin
    Zhou, Yingyu
    Shan, Linghan
    Li, Cui
    Cui, Yu
    Kang, Zheng
    Jiao, Mingli
    Liu, Huan
    Gao, Lijun
    Wu, Qunhong
    Hao, Yanhua
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [16] IS GERONTOCRACY HARMFUL FOR GROWTH? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEVEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Atella, Vincenzo
    Carbonari, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (01) : 141 - 168
  • [17] Haematological anticancer drugs in Europe: any added value at the time of approval?
    Vittorio Bertele’
    Rita Banzi
    Filippo Capasso
    Giovanni Tafuri
    Francesco Trotta
    Giovanni Apolone
    Silvio Garattini
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2007, 63 : 713 - 719
  • [18] Haematological anticancer drugs in Europe: any added value at the time of approval?
    Bertele, Vittorio
    Banzi, Rita
    Capasso, Filippo
    Tafuri, Giovanni
    Trotta, Francesco
    Apolone, Giovanni
    Garattini, Silvio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 63 (07) : 713 - 719
  • [19] Prices and distribution margins of in-patent drugs in pharmacy: A comparison in seven European countries
    Garattini, Livio
    Motterlini, Nicola
    Comago, Dante
    HEALTH POLICY, 2008, 85 (03) : 305 - 313
  • [20] Patient organisations and the reimbursement process for medicines: an exploratory study in eight European countries
    Noordman, Janneke
    van Dijk, Liset
    Friele, Roland
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10