Management of infodemics in outbreaks or health crises: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Abuhaloob, Lamis [1 ]
Purnat, Tina D. [2 ]
Tabche, Celine [1 ]
Atwan, Zeenah [3 ]
Dubois, Elizabeth [1 ]
Rawaf, Salman [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Fac Med, WHO, Sch Publ Hlth,Collaborating Ctr Publ Hlth Educ & T, London, England
[2] Univ Memphis, Sch Publ Hlth, Memphis, TN USA
[3] Univ Al Basra, Fac Med, Dept Microbiol, Al Basra, Iraq
关键词
infodemic; infodemic management; infodemiology; COVID-19; outbreak; health crisis; health emergency; misinformation; SOCIAL MEDIA; COVID-19;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1343902
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) defined an infodemic as an overabundance of information, accurate or not, in the digital and physical space, accompanying an acute health event such as an outbreak or epidemic. It can impact people's risk perceptions, trust, and confidence in the health system, and health workers. As an immediate response, the WHO developed the infodemic management (IM) frameworks, research agenda, intervention frameworks, competencies, and processes for reference by health authorities.Objective This systematic review explored the response to and during acute health events by health authorities and other organizations operating in health. It also assessed the effectiveness of the current interventions.Methods On 26 June 2023, an online database search included Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Epistemonikos, and the WHO website. It included English-only, peer-reviewed studies or reports covering IM processes applied by health organizations that reported their effectiveness. There was no restriction on publication dates. Two independent reviewers conducted all screening, inclusion, and quality assessments, and a third reviewer arbitrated any disagreement between the two reviewers.Results Reviewers identified 945 records. After a final assessment, 29 studies were included in the review and were published between 2021 and 2023. Some countries (Pakistan, Yemen, Spain, Italy, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States, New Zealand, Finland, South Korea, and Russia) applied different methods of IM to people's behaviors. These included but were not limited to launching media and TV conservations, using web and scientific database searches, posting science-based COVID-19 information, implementing online surveys, and creating an innovative ecosystem of digital tools, and an Early AI-supported response with Social Listening (EARS) platform. Most of the interventions were effective in containing the harmful effects of COVID-19 infodemic. However, the quality of the evidence was not robust.Discussion Most of the infodemic interventions applied during COVID-19 fall within the recommended actions of the WHO IM ecosystem. As a result, the study suggests that more research is needed into the challenges facing health systems in different operational environments and country contexts in relation to designing, implementing, and evaluating IM interventions, strategies, policies, and systems.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health literacy action framework for health emergencies and infodemics
    Okan O.
    Messer M.
    Levin-Zamir D.
    Dadaczynski K.
    Paakkari L.
    Schaeffer D.
    Sorensen K.
    Information Services and Use, 2023, 43 (02): : 115 - 130
  • [22] Knowledge management in health: a systematic literature review
    Brito Rocha, Elyrose Sousa
    Nagliate, Patricia
    Bis Furlan, Claudia Elisangela
    Rocha, Kerson, Jr.
    Trevizan, Maria Auxiliadora
    Costa Mendes, Isabel Amelia
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2012, 20 (02): : 392 - 400
  • [23] Alternatives to mental health admissions for children and adolescents experiencing mental health crises: A systematic review of the literature
    Clisu, Denisa A.
    Layther, Imogen
    Dover, Deborah
    Viner, Russell M.
    Read, Tina
    Cheesman, David
    Hodges, Sally
    Hudson, Lee D.
    CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 27 (01) : 35 - 60
  • [24] Bronchoscopy-related outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks: A systematic review
    Kakoullis, Loukas
    Economidou, Sofia
    Mehrotra, Preeti
    Panos, George
    Karampitsakos, Theodoros
    Stratakos, Grigorios
    Tzouvelekis, Argyrios
    Sampsonas, Fotios
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 45 (04): : 509 - 519
  • [25] A Systematic Review and Provisional Metanalysis on Psychopathologic Burden on Health Care Workers of Coronavirus Outbreaks
    Galli, Federica
    Pozzi, Gino
    Ruggiero, Fabiana
    Mameli, Francesca
    Cavicchioli, Marco
    Barbieri, Sergio
    Canevini, Maria Paola
    Priori, Alberto
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    Sani, Gabriele
    Ferrucci, Roberta
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 11
  • [26] Evaluating the Effectiveness of Public Health Measures During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
    Lawrence, Adewale
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [27] Coordination of health-service provision in humanitarian crises: a systematic review of suggested models
    Lotfi, Tamara
    Bou-Karroum, Lama
    Darzi, Andrea
    Hajjar, Rayan
    El Rahyel, Ahmad
    El-Eid, Jamale
    Itani, Mira
    Brax, Hneine
    Akik, Chaza
    Osman, Mona
    Hassan, Ghayda
    El-Jardali, Fadi
    Akl, Elie A.
    LANCET, 2017, 390 : 37 - 37
  • [28] Evaluating the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health services during humanitarian crises: A systematic review
    Singh, Neha S.
    Smith, James
    Aryasinghe, Sarindi
    Khosla, Rajat
    Say, Lale
    Blanchet, Karl
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [29] Subjective experiences of the first response to mental health crises in the community: a qualitative systematic review
    Xanthopoulou, Penny
    Thomas, Ciara
    Dooley, Jemima
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [30] Clinical review: The management of hypertensive crises
    Varon, J
    Marik, PE
    CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 7 (05) : 374 - 384