Management of infodemics in outbreaks or health crises: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Abuhaloob, Lamis [1 ]
Purnat, Tina D. [2 ]
Tabche, Celine [1 ]
Atwan, Zeenah [3 ]
Dubois, Elizabeth [1 ]
Rawaf, Salman [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Fac Med, WHO, Sch Publ Hlth,Collaborating Ctr Publ Hlth Educ & T, London, England
[2] Univ Memphis, Sch Publ Hlth, Memphis, TN USA
[3] Univ Al Basra, Fac Med, Dept Microbiol, Al Basra, Iraq
关键词
infodemic; infodemic management; infodemiology; COVID-19; outbreak; health crisis; health emergency; misinformation; SOCIAL MEDIA; COVID-19;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1343902
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) defined an infodemic as an overabundance of information, accurate or not, in the digital and physical space, accompanying an acute health event such as an outbreak or epidemic. It can impact people's risk perceptions, trust, and confidence in the health system, and health workers. As an immediate response, the WHO developed the infodemic management (IM) frameworks, research agenda, intervention frameworks, competencies, and processes for reference by health authorities.Objective This systematic review explored the response to and during acute health events by health authorities and other organizations operating in health. It also assessed the effectiveness of the current interventions.Methods On 26 June 2023, an online database search included Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Epistemonikos, and the WHO website. It included English-only, peer-reviewed studies or reports covering IM processes applied by health organizations that reported their effectiveness. There was no restriction on publication dates. Two independent reviewers conducted all screening, inclusion, and quality assessments, and a third reviewer arbitrated any disagreement between the two reviewers.Results Reviewers identified 945 records. After a final assessment, 29 studies were included in the review and were published between 2021 and 2023. Some countries (Pakistan, Yemen, Spain, Italy, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States, New Zealand, Finland, South Korea, and Russia) applied different methods of IM to people's behaviors. These included but were not limited to launching media and TV conservations, using web and scientific database searches, posting science-based COVID-19 information, implementing online surveys, and creating an innovative ecosystem of digital tools, and an Early AI-supported response with Social Listening (EARS) platform. Most of the interventions were effective in containing the harmful effects of COVID-19 infodemic. However, the quality of the evidence was not robust.Discussion Most of the infodemic interventions applied during COVID-19 fall within the recommended actions of the WHO IM ecosystem. As a result, the study suggests that more research is needed into the challenges facing health systems in different operational environments and country contexts in relation to designing, implementing, and evaluating IM interventions, strategies, policies, and systems.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determinants of Infodemics During Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
    Alvarez-Galvez, Javier
    Suarez-Lledo, Victor
    Rojas-Garcia, Antonio
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [2] Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews
    Do Nascimento, Israel Junior Borges
    Pizarro, Ana Beatriz
    Almeida, Jussara M.
    Azzopardi-Muscat, Natasha
    Goncalves, Marcos Andre
    Bjorklunde, Maria
    Novillo-Ortiz, David
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2022, 100 (09) : 544 - 561
  • [3] Health-Related Crises in Tourism Destination Management: A Systematic Review
    Vong, Celeste
    Rita, Paulo
    Antonio, Nuno
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [4] A Systematic Review on Health Resilience to Economic Crises
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Gordeev, Vladimir S.
    Goryakin, Yevgeniy
    Reeves, Aaron
    Stuckler, David
    McKee, Martin
    Roberts, Bayard
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [5] Lessons learned for infodemics management in future health crises by studying the fear of COVID-1 impact on health information seeking of general population
    Kostagiolas, Petros
    Platis, Charalampos
    Belitsas, Alkeviadis
    Psomiadi, Maria Elisavet
    Niakas, Dimitris
    ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [6] One Health in the context of coronavirus outbreaks: A systematic literature review
    Schmiege, Dennis
    Arredondo, Ana Maria Perez
    Ntajal, Joshua
    Paris, Juliana Minetto Gellert
    Savi, Merveille Koissi
    Patel, Krupali
    Yasobant, Sandul
    Falkenberg, Timo
    ONE HEALTH, 2020, 10
  • [7] A systematic review of nicardipine vs labetalol for the management of hypertensive crises
    Peacock, W. Frank
    Hilleman, Daniel E.
    Levy, Phillip D.
    Rhoney, Denise H.
    Varon, Joseph
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 30 (06): : 981 - 993
  • [8] Impact of economic crises on mental health care: a systematic review
    Silva, M.
    Resurreccion, D. M.
    Antunes, A.
    Frasquilho, D.
    Cardoso, G.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2020, 29
  • [9] Public health management of invasive meningococcal disease outbreaks: worldwide 1973-2018, a systematic review
    Morello, Brianna R.
    Milazzo, Adriana
    Marshall, Helen Siobhan
    Giles, Lynne C.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [10] PUBLIC HEALTH COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH OUTBREAKS OF MENINGOCCOCAL DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Anonychuk, A.
    Vyse, A.
    Woo, G.
    Tricco, A. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A401 - A401