Machine learning in laryngeal cancer: A pilot study to predict oncological outcomes and the role of adverse features

被引:3
|
作者
Petruzzi, Gerardo [1 ]
Coden, Elisa [2 ]
Iocca, Oreste [3 ]
di Maio, Pasquale [4 ]
Pichi, Barbara [1 ]
Campo, Flaminia [1 ]
De Virgilio, Armando [5 ,6 ]
Francesco, Mazzola [1 ]
Vidiri, Antonello [7 ]
Pellini, Raul [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, Dept Otolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Via Elio Chianesi 53, I-00144 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Insubria, Osped Circolo & Fdn Macchi, Div Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
[3] Univ Torino, Div Maxillofacial Surg, Citta Salute & Sci, Turin, Italy
[4] Giuseppe Fornaroli Hosp, Dept otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, ASST Ovest Milanese, Magenta, Italy
[5] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[6] IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Milan, Italy
[7] IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Rome, Italy
关键词
algorithm; artificial intelligence; laryngeal cancer; machine learning; oncological outcome; open surgery; CLASSIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; HYPOPHARYNX; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/hed.27434
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
BackgroundLaryngeal carcinoma (LC) remains a significant economic and emotional problem to the healthcare system and severe social morbidity. New tools as Machine Learning could allow clinicians to develop accurate and reproducible treatments. MethodsThis study aims to evaluate the performance of a ML-algorithm in predicting 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) in a cohort of patients surgical treated for LC. Moreover, the impact of different adverse features on prognosis will be investigated. Data was collected on oncological FU of 132 patients. A retrospective review was performed to create a dataset of 23 variables for each patient. ResultsThe decision-tree algorithm is highly effective in predicting the prognosis, with a 95% accuracy in predicting the 1-year survival and 82.5% in 3-year survival; The measured AUC area is 0.886 at 1-year Test and 0.871 at 3-years Test. The measured AUC area is 0.917 at 1-year Training set and 0.964 at 3-years Training set. Factors that affected 1yOS are: LNR, type of surgery, and subsite. The most significant variables at 3yOS are: number of metastasis, perineural invasion and Grading. ConclusionsThe integration of ML in medical practices could revolutionize our approach on cancer pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:2068 / 2078
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Epidemiological, clinical and oncological outcomes of young patients with laryngeal cancer: a systematic review
    Lechien, Jerome R.
    Maniaci, Antonino
    Hans, Stephane
    Iannella, Giannicola
    Fakhry, Nicolas
    Mayo-Yanez, Miguel
    Ayad, Tareck
    Mannelli, Giuditta
    Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos M.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (12) : 5741 - 5753
  • [22] Machine learning to predict adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Penny-Dimri, Jahan C.
    Bergmeir, Christoph
    Perry, Luke
    Hayes, Linley
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Smith, Julian A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (11) : 3838 - 3845
  • [23] Clinical features and oncological outcomes of bladder cancer microsatellite instability
    Nagakawa, Shohei
    Shiota, Masaki
    Takamatsu, Dai
    Tsukahara, Shigehiro
    Mastumoto, Takashi
    Blas, Leandro
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Oda, Yoshihiro
    Eto, Masatoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 438 - 445
  • [24] Clinical features and oncological outcomes of primary female urethral cancer
    Lee, Wonchul
    Yu, Jesang
    Lee, Jae-Lyun
    Kim, Young Seok
    Hong, Bumsik
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 125 (05) : 907 - 915
  • [25] Machine learning-based prediction of adverse outcomes from malnutrition in people with cancer
    Kiss, Nicole
    Steer, Belinda
    de van der Schueren, Marian
    Loeliger, Jenelle
    Alizadehsani, Roohallah
    Edbrooke, Lara
    Deftereos, Irene
    Laing, Erin
    Khosravi, Abbas
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 : 92 - 93
  • [26] Machine learning to predict transplant outcomes: helpful or hype? A national cohort study
    Bae, Sunjae
    Massie, Allan B.
    Caffo, Brian S.
    Jackson, Kyle R.
    Segev, Dorry L.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 33 (11) : 1472 - 1480
  • [27] Machine learning of biomarkers and clinical observation to predict eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis: a pilot study
    Thorwarth, Ryan M.
    Scott, Derek W.
    Lal, Devyani
    Marino, Michael J.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2021, 11 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [28] The role of butyrate in surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Hajjar, Roy
    Richard, Carole S.
    Santos, Manuela M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 320 (04): : G601 - G608
  • [29] Machine learning model using immune indicators to predict outcomes in early liver cancer
    Zhang, Yi
    Shi, Ke
    Feng, Ying
    Wang, Xian-Bo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2025, 31 (05)
  • [30] Natural language processing with machine learning to predict outcomes after ovarian cancer surgery
    Barber, Emma L.
    Garg, Ravi
    Persenaire, Christianne
    Simon, Melissa
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 160 (01) : 182 - 186