Reducing the number and types of tobacco retail outlets in the Netherlands: Study protocol for a comprehensive mixed-methods policy evaluation

被引:4
|
作者
Nagelhout, Gera E. [1 ,2 ]
Poole, Nikita L. [1 ,2 ]
Metze, Marcel [3 ]
Willemsen, Marc C. [2 ,4 ]
Vermeulen, Wouter [5 ]
van den Brand, Floor A. [6 ]
机构
[1] IVO Res Inst, POB 30833, NL-2500 GV The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Res Inst, Dept Hlth Promot Care & Publ Hlth, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Invest Desk, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Trimbos Inst, Natl Expertise Ctr Tobacco Control, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] SEO Amsterdam Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Res Inst, Dept Family Med Care & Publ Hlth, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
关键词
tobacco policy evaluation; sales ban social class deprived; neighborhoods supermarkets; IMPACT;
D O I
10.18332/tpc/161825
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
The Netherlands plans to ban tobacco sales in supermarkets in 2024. In a comprehensive policy evaluation, we aim to examine: 1) the impact of the policy on the number and types of tobacco outlets, 2) the impact on attitudes and behaviors of smoking adults and non-smoking youth, and 3) the influence of the tobacco industry on the policy process and the retail environment. In addition, our study focusses on differential effects in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where both smoking rates and tobacco outlet density are typically highest. This study brings together economic, psychological, and journalistic research methods. We investigate the impact of the new legislation on the number and type of tobacco outlets, and on the number of smokers by using routinely collected population monitoring data. We examine the impact of the legislation on smoking susceptibility of non-smoking youth and on impulse tobacco purchases by smoking adults with yearly quantitative surveys and with qualitative interviews and discussion sessions. We describe whether these impacts differ for disadvantaged versus non-disadvantaged neighborhoods. We investigate what strategies the tobacco industry uses to influence the new legislation, policy processes, and the tobacco retail environment by performing a journalistic investigation, by means of documents obtained by Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, (possibly) leaked documents from insider meetings, and interviews with insiders. The methods of our evaluation can be used as a model for other comprehensive public policy evaluations. REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials ID NCT05554120, Protocol ID KWF140282021-2. ABBREVIATIONS FOIA: Freedom of Information Act. SES-WOA: socioeconomic scores of private households. MCID: minimal clinically important difference.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An investigation of consumers' use of 'dessert-only' food retail outlets: a mixed-methods study
    Randall, Tennessee
    Wright, Poppy J.
    Wilkinson, Laura L.
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2021, 24 (09) : 2473 - 2482
  • [2] Multicountry research on comprehensive abortion policy implementation in Latin America: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Gialdini, Celina
    Michel, Agustina Ramon
    Romero, Mariana
    Ramos, Silvina
    Carroli, Guillermo
    Carroli, Berenise
    de Leon, Rodolfo Gomez Ponce
    Ortiz, Mercedes Vila
    Lavelanet, Antonella
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [3] No Prescription, No Problem! A Mixed-Methods Study of Antimicrobial Stewardship Relating to Working Equines in Drug Retail Outlets of Northern India
    Nye, Caroline
    Watson, Tamlin
    Kubasiewicz, Laura
    Raw, Zoe
    Burden, Faith
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2020, 9 (06): : 1 - 12
  • [4] A comprehensive interventional program to improve the sexual function of women with endometriosis: a mixed-methods protocol study
    Sarvestani, Maryam Heidari
    Noroozi, Mahnaz
    Hashemi, Maryam
    Mostafavi, Firoozeh
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [5] Comprehensive quality assessment for aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: protocol for a multicentre, mixed-methods study
    Harvey, Sam
    Stone, Marissa
    Zingelman, Sally
    Copland, David A.
    Kilkenny, Monique F.
    Godecke, Erin
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    Kim, Joosup
    Olaiya, Muideen T.
    Rose, Miranda L.
    Breitenstein, Caterina
    Shrubsole, Kirstine
    O'Halloran, Robyn
    Hill, Annie J.
    Hersh, Deborah
    Mainstone, Kathryn
    Mainstone, Penelope
    Unsworth, Carolyn A.
    Brogan, Emily
    Short, Kylie J.
    Burns, Clare L.
    Baker, Caroline
    Wallace, Sarah J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [6] A comprehensive interventional program to improve the sexual function of women with endometriosis: a mixed-methods protocol study
    Maryam Heidari Sarvestani
    Mahnaz Noroozi
    Maryam Hashemi
    Firoozeh Mostafavi
    Reproductive Health, 21
  • [7] Process evaluation in practice based research networks: a study protocol for a mixed-methods implementation study
    Sanftenberg, Linda
    Dreischulte, Tobias
    Haerdtlein, Annette
    Kosub, Helena
    Gagyor, Ildiko
    Kurotschka, Peter Konstantin
    Kuehlein, Thomas
    Burggraf, Larissa
    Eck, Stefanie
    Roos, Marco
    Gensichen, Jochen
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [8] Evaluation of the digital diabetes prevention programme pilot: uncontrolled mixed-methods study protocol
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Daff, Kerry
    Lavida, Anthi
    Henley, William
    Irwin, Jenny
    Valabhji, Jonathan
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [9] Study protocol: a mixed-methods realist evaluation of the Universal Health Visiting Pathway in Scotland
    Doi, Lawrence
    Morrison, Kathleen
    Astbury, Ruth
    Eunson, Jane
    Horne, Margaret A.
    Jepson, Ruth
    Marryat, Louise
    Ormston, Rachel
    Wood, Rachael
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [10] Researching two Compassionate Cities: study protocol for a mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation
    Quintiens, Bert
    Smets, Tinne
    Chambaere, Kenneth
    Van Den Block, Lieve
    Deliens, Luc
    Cohen, Joachim
    PALLIATIVE CARE & SOCIAL PRACTICE, 2022, 16