Brain metastasis tumor segmentation and detection using deep learning algorithms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Ting-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, Ming-Sheng [2 ]
Lee, Wei-Kai [1 ]
Pan, Hung-Chuan [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Huai-Che [2 ,3 ]
Lee, Cheng-Chia [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Yu-Te [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Biophoton, 155,Sec 2,Li Nong St, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Brain Res Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Coll Med Device Innovat & Translat Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Brain metastases; Deep learning algorithms; MRI images; segmentation; Detection; Meta-analysis; AUTOMATIC DETECTION; CANCER; GUIDELINES; RESECTION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Manual detection of brain metastases is both laborious and inconsistent, driving the need for more efficient solutions. Accordingly, our systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of deep learning algorithms in detecting and segmenting brain metastases from various primary origins in MRI images. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to May 24, 2023, which yielded 42 relevant studies for our analysis. We assessed the quality of these studies using the QUADAS-2 and CLAIM tools. Using a random-effect model, we calculated the pooled lesion-wise dice score as well as patientwise and lesion-wise sensitivity. We performed subgroup analyses to investigate the influence of factors such as publication year, study design, training center of the model, validation methods, slice thickness, model input dimensions, MRI sequences fed to the model, and the specific deep learning algorithms employed. Additionally, meta-regression analyses were carried out considering the number of patients in the studies, count of MRI manufacturers, count of MRI models, training sample size, and lesion number. Results: Our analysis highlighted that deep learning models, particularly the U-Net and its variants, demonstrated superior segmentation accuracy. Enhanced detection sensitivity was observed with an increased diversity in MRI hardware, both in terms of manufacturer and model variety. Furthermore, slice thickness was identified as a significant factor influencing lesion-wise detection sensitivity. Overall, the pooled results indicated a lesion-wise dice score of 79%, with patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivities at 86% and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: The study underscores the potential of deep learning in improving brain metastasis diagnostics and treatment planning. Still, more extensive cohorts and larger meta-analysis are needed for more practical and generalizable algorithms. Future research should prioritize these areas to advance the field. This study was funded by the Gen. & Mrs. M.C. Peng Fellowship and registered under PROSPERO (CRD42023427776).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fish intake and the risk of brain tumor: a meta-analysis with systematic review
    Lian, Wei
    Wang, Renzhi
    Xing, Bing
    Yao, Yong
    [J]. NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2017, 16
  • [42] Association between depression and brain tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Jing
    Zeng, Chao
    Xiao, Juxiong
    Zhao, Danwei
    Tang, Hui
    Wu, Haishan
    Chen, Jindong
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (55) : 94932 - 94943
  • [43] Fish intake and the risk of brain tumor: a meta-analysis with systematic review
    Wei Lian
    Renzhi Wang
    Bing Xing
    Yong Yao
    [J]. Nutrition Journal, 16
  • [44] Deep learning for temporomandibular joint arthropathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rokhshad, Rata
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    Sohrabniya, Fatemeh
    Jafari, Bahare
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Tsolakis, Ioannis A.
    Ourang, Seyed AmirHossein
    Sultan, Ahmed S.
    Khawaja, Shehryar Nasir
    Bavarian, Roxanne
    Palomo, Juan Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 51 (08) : 1632 - 1644
  • [45] Deep learning for wireless capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Soffer, Shelly
    Klang, Eyal
    Shimon, Orit
    Nachmias, Noy
    Eliakim, Rami
    Ben-Horin, Shomron
    Kopylov, Uri
    Barash, Yiftach
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (04) : 831 - +
  • [46] Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Segmentation & Analysis
    Chahal, Ekam Singh
    Haritosh, Ankur
    Gupta, Ayush
    Gupta, Kanav
    Sinha, Adwitiya
    [J]. 2019 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION & POWER ENGINEERING (RDCAPE), 2019, : 378 - 383
  • [47] MRI brain tumor medical images analysis using deep learning techniques: a systematic review
    Sabaa Ahmed Yahya Al-Galal
    Imad Fakhri Taha Alshaikhli
    M. M. Abdulrazzaq
    [J]. Health and Technology, 2021, 11 : 267 - 282
  • [48] MRI brain tumor medical images analysis using deep learning techniques: a systematic review
    Al-Galal, Sabaa Ahmed Yahya
    Alshaikhli, Imad Fakhri Taha
    Abdulrazzaq, M. M.
    [J]. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (02) : 267 - 282
  • [49] Deep learning for brain metastasis detection and segmentation in longitudinal MRI data
    Huang, Yixing
    Bert, Christoph
    Sommer, Philipp
    Frey, Benjamin
    Gaipl, Udo
    Distel, Luitpold, V
    Weissmann, Thomas
    Uder, Michael
    Schmidt, Manuel A.
    Dorfler, Arnd
    Maier, Andreas
    Fietkau, Rainer
    Putz, Florian
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (09) : 5773 - 5786
  • [50] A Deep Learning Architecture for Meningioma Brain Tumor Detection and Segmentation
    Anita, John Nisha
    Kumaran, Sujatha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2022, 27 (03) : 192 - 198