What is the success rate of trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic twins? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

被引:1
|
作者
Xodo, Serena [1 ]
Orsaria, Maria [2 ]
Londero, Ambrogio P. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sch Med Udine, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Udine, Italy
[2] Sch Med Udine, Inst Pathol, Udine, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynaecol, Genoa, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
关键词
delivery mode; intrapartum twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome; monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy; trial of labor; twin pregnancy; RETROSPECTIVE-COHORT; TRANSFUSION SYNDROME; VAGINAL DELIVERY; MODE; PREGNANCIES; BIRTH; RISK; DISORDERS; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100767
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the success rate of trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies and the impact of delivery mode on neonatal outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the inception of each database until April 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Selection criteria included observational studies analyzing the delivery mode among monochorionic diamniotic gestations. METHODS: All analyses were carried out using an intention-to-treat approach, evaluating women according to the delivery mode to which they were assigned in the original studies. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria and were suitable for qualitative and quantitative analysis. In total, 4116 women were analyzed. This meta-analysis showed that trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies resulted in vaginal delivery of both twins in 75.5% of cases (95% confidence interval, 69.1-80.9). Failure to deliver the second twin vaginally occurred in 3.8% of cases (95% confidence interval, 2.5-5.7). In addition, the neonatal outcomes were comparable among women with monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy undergoing different planned delivery modes. Neonatal death occurred in 3.7 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery group and in 1.6 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Perinatal death was observed in 7.5 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery group and in 5.8 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Umbilical artery pH <7.00 occurred in 0 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery and 4.6 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Neonatal intensive care unit stay of >72 hours had a prevalence of 59.7 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery and 42.8 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies is successful in most cases and relatively safe, considering that neonatal and perinatal mortality and severe morbidity were comparable between the trial of labor and planned cesarean delivery groups. Therefore, the choice of planned delivery mode in twin gestations should not be made a priori.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prevalence of sarcopenia in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Nicola Veronese
    Lee Smith
    Ai Koyanagi
    Jaco Hoffman
    Mouna Snoussi
    Konstantinos Prokopidis
    Ligia J. Dominguez
    Mario Barbagallo
    [J]. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 36
  • [42] Procalcitonin Levels in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
    Prabhu, Malavika
    Wilkie, Gianna
    MacEachern, Mark
    LaBuda, Dana
    Purtell, Jasmine
    Riley, Laura
    Habib, Ashraf
    Bauer, Melissa
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (02) : 320 - 320
  • [43] Statins and risk of cataracts: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Alves, Carlos
    Mendes, Diogo
    Marques, Francisco Batel
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [44] Normal Range for Maternal Lactic Acid during Pregnancy and Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
    Bauer, Melissa E.
    Balistreri, Michael
    MacEachern, Mark
    Cassidy, Ruth
    Schoenfeld, Robert
    Sankar, Keerthana
    Clauw, Daniel J.
    Langen, Elizabeth
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 36 (09) : 898 - 906
  • [45] The rate of hypoglycaemic events in individuals with type 1 diabetes; systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Alsharif, Alaa A.
    Alwafi, Hassan H.
    Almetwazi, Mansour
    Wei, Li
    Naser, Abdallah Y.
    Bell, J. Simon
    Ilomaki, Jenni
    Fang, Gang
    Wong, Ian C. K.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 455 - 455
  • [46] Perinatal outcomes in dichorionic diamniotic twins with multifetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jin, Bihui
    Huang, Qiongxiao
    Ji, Mengxia
    Yu, Zhizhi
    Shu, Jing
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (25) : E20730
  • [47] Associations of Sedentary Time with Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
    Alansare, Abdullah Bandar
    Bates, Lauren C.
    Stoner, Lee
    Kline, Christopher E.
    Nagle, Elizabeth
    Jennings, J. Richard
    Hanson, Erik D.
    Faghy, Mark A.
    Gibbs, Bethany Barone
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (16)
  • [48] What Is the Success of Implants Placed in Fibula Flap? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gangwani, Pooja
    Almana, Mohammed
    Barmak, Basir
    Kolokythas, Antonia
    [J]. JOMR-JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (01):
  • [49] Cesarean delivery for twins: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hogle, KL
    Hutton, E
    McBrien, KA
    Barrett, JFR
    Hannah, ME
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 220 - 227
  • [50] Cesarean section for twins: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hogle, K
    Hutton, E
    McBrien, K
    Barrett, J
    Hannah, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S108 - S108