Rear-End Collision Risk Analysis for Autonomous Driving

被引:0
|
作者
Liang, Ci [1 ]
Ghazel, Mohamed [2 ]
Ci, Yusheng [1 ]
El Faouzi, Nour-Eddin [3 ]
Wang, Rui [4 ]
Zheng, Wei [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Gustave Eiffel, IFSTTAR, COSYS ESTAS, F-59650 Villeneuve Dascq, France
[3] Univ Gustave Eiffel, IFSTTAR, Univ Lyon, ENTPE,LICIT ECO7,UMR T9401, F-69675 Lyon, France
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Railway Traff Safety, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Natl Res Ctr Railway Safety Assessment, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
关键词
Autonomous driving; Risk analysis; Human-like brake model; Rear-end collision; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; PREDICTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-40953-0_23
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Since there will be a mix of automated vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) on future roadways, in the literature, while many existing studies have investigated collisions where an AV hits an HV from behind, few studies have focused on the scenarios where an HV hits an AV from behind (called HV-AV collision). In this paper, we will investigate the HV-AV collision risk in the Stop-in-Lane (SiL) scenario. To achieve this aim, a Human-like Brake (HLB) model is proposed first to simulate the driver brake control. In particular, the joint distribution of Off-Road-Glance and Time-Headway is originally introduced to simulate the glance distraction of drivers during their dynamic vehicle control. Sequentially, a case study of HV-AV collisions in the SiL scenario of autonomous driving (AD) is conducted based on the HLB model, to reveal how the collision probability changes with respect to various parameters. The results of the case study provide us with an in-depth understanding of the dynamic driving conditions that lead to rear-end collisions in the SiL scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 282
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AUTOMOBILE REAR-END COLLISION - UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT DEFENSE
    不详
    [J]. DEFENSE LAW JOURNAL, 1970, 19 (04) : 442 - 444
  • [42] Hierarchical longitudinal controller for rear-end collision avoidance
    Kim, Dae-Jin
    Park, Kwang-Hyun
    Bien, Zeungnam
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2007, 54 (02) : 805 - 817
  • [43] Multi-agent and driving behavior based rear-end collision alarm modeling and simulating
    Jun, Liang
    Long, Chen
    Xian-yi, Cheng
    Xian-bo, Chen
    [J]. SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2010, 18 (08) : 1092 - 1103
  • [44] Effective Method for Rear-end Collision Warning System
    Ito, Toshio
    Osawa, Kenta
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS 19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE, KES-2015, 2015, 60 : 700 - 707
  • [45] CEREBRAL-HEMORRHAGE AFTER REAR-END COLLISION
    BAUER, G
    PILS, P
    [J]. UNFALLHEILKUNDE-TRAUMATOLOGY, 1984, 87 (01): : 37 - 39
  • [46] Autonomous Braking Algorithm for Rear-End Collision via Communication-Efficient Federated Learning
    Liu, Sha
    Fu, Yuchuan
    Zhao, Pincan
    Li, Fan
    Li, Changle
    [J]. 2021 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM), 2021,
  • [47] Generalized nonlinear models for rear-end crash risk analysis
    Lao, Yunteng
    Zhang, Guohui
    Wang, Yinhai
    Milton, John
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2014, 62 : 9 - 16
  • [48] Research on Fuzzy Inference of Driver's Risk Perception of Rear-end Collision on Freeway
    Lu Siwen
    Zheng Shiwen
    [J]. ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 772 - 775
  • [49] Generalized nonlinear models for rear-end crash risk analysis
    Lao, Yunteng
    Zhang, Guohui
    Wang, Yinhai
    Milton, John
    [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 62 : 9 - 16
  • [50] Development of a Deceleration-Based Surrogate Safety Measure for Rear-End Collision Risk
    Tak, Sehyun
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Yeo, Hwasoo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 16 (05) : 2435 - 2445