Assessment of robotic telesurgery system among surgeons: a single-center study

被引:6
|
作者
Rudiman, Reno [1 ]
Mirbagheri, Alireza [2 ,3 ]
Candrawinata, Valeska Siulinda [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padjadjaran, Hasan Sadikin Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Surg,Divi Digest Surg, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Adv Med Technol & Equipment Inst AMTEI, Res Ctr Biomed Technol & Robot RCBTR, Tehran, Iran
[4] Pelita Harapan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Tangerang, Indonesia
关键词
Surgeon performance; Practice duration; Robotic surgery simulator; OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED ASSESSMENT; SKILLS; CURRICULUM; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01709-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The field of robotic-assisted surgery is expanding rapidly; therefore, future robotic surgeons will need to be trained in an organized manner. Here, we aimed to examine surgeon performance on the Sinaflex Robotic Telesurgery System for correlation with training hours spent in training program. This is a prospective study of a single-center experience at the Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung City of West Java, Indonesia. We included 43 surgeons from 11 departments, all invited to train using the Sinaflex Robotic Telesurgery system at the Hasan Sadikin Hospital. All study cohorts have never performed a robotic surgery procedure beforehand and have had at least five years of field experience. The surgeons were free to choose their training duration and simulation. After finishing the training session, they were asked to perform several tasks with increasing difficulty levels. There were nine training tasks in total with increasing levels of difficulty. A total of 43 surgeons from 11 different department were included in this prospective study. Our study was separated into 3 different batches and most surgeons failed to pass the examination (n = 12, 8, and 9, for batches 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The "failed" surgeon, additionally, tended to be older than the "passed" cohort (49.3 & PLUSMN; 7.4 vs 42.1 & PLUSMN; 7.3 years old, p = 0.005). In terms of duration of hours spent training on the robot, there was little difference training hours between the cohort that passed and the cohort that failed cohort (10.0 [8.4-10.1] vs 10.0 [8.0-10.0], respectively) with a p value of 0.265. We found no correlation between the total hours spent in the training program and surgeon performance on the Sinaflex robotic telesurgery system. Structured robot surgical training courses must be incorporated into the training programs.
引用
收藏
页码:2757 / 2761
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ergonomic assessment of robotic general surgeons: a pilot study
    Anthony Dwyer
    Jeremy Huckleby
    Majid Kabbani
    Angela Delano
    Michelle De Sutter
    David Crawford
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14 : 387 - 392
  • [32] Robotic surgery and liver transplantation: A single-center experience of 501 robotic donor hepatectomies
    Schulze, Maren
    Elsheikh, Yasser
    Boehnert, Markus Ulrich
    Alnemary, Yasir
    Alabbad, Saleh
    Broering, Dieter Clemens
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 21 (04) : 334 - 339
  • [33] Robotic surgery and liver transplantation: A single-center experience of 501 robotic donor hepatectomies
    Maren Schulze
    Yasser Elsheikh
    Markus Ulrich Boehnert
    Yasir Alnemary
    Saleh Alabbad
    Dieter Clemens Broering
    Hepatobiliary&PancreaticDiseasesInternational, 2022, 21 (04) : 334 - 339
  • [34] An organizational model to improve the robotic system among general surgeons
    Ielpo, B.
    Vicente, E.
    Quijano, Y.
    Duran, H.
    Diaz, E.
    Fabra, I.
    Oliva, C.
    Olivares, S.
    Ceron, R.
    Ferri, V.
    Caruso, R.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2014, 35 (1-2): : 52 - 55
  • [35] Robotic-assisted surgery conversion: the sooner, the better? Insights from a single-center study
    Violante, Tommaso
    Ferrari, Davide
    Mathis, Kellie L.
    D'Angelo, Anne-Lise D.
    Dozois, Eric J.
    Merchea, Amit
    Larson, David W.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 28 (07) : 1158 - 1160
  • [36] A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy
    Giovanni Butturini
    Isacco Damoli
    Lorenzo Crepaz
    Giuseppe Malleo
    Giovanni Marchegiani
    Despoina Daskalaki
    Alessandro Esposito
    Sara Cingarlini
    Roberto Salvia
    Claudio Bassi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 3163 - 3170
  • [37] A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Damoli, Isacco
    Crepaz, Lorenzo
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Daskalaki, Despoina
    Esposito, Alessandro
    Cingarlini, Sara
    Salvia, Roberto
    Bassi, Claudio
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (11): : 3163 - 3170
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted spinal surgery: A single-center retrospective study
    Chumnanvej, Sorayouth
    Ariyaprakai, Krish
    Pillai, Branesh M.
    Suthakorn, Jackrit
    Gurusamy, Sharvesh
    Chumnanvej, Siriluk
    LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 6 (04): : 147 - 153
  • [39] Laparoscopic versus robotic inguinal hernia repair: a single-center case-matched study
    Ayuso, Sullivan A.
    Marturano, Matthew N.
    Katzen, Michael M.
    Aladegbami, Bola G.
    Augenstein, Vedra A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (01): : 631 - 637
  • [40] Laparoscopic versus robotic inguinal hernia repair: a single-center case-matched study
    Sullivan A. Ayuso
    Matthew N. Marturano
    Michael M. Katzen
    Bola G. Aladegbami
    Vedra A. Augenstein
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 631 - 637