Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Terms of Analgesic Efficacy in Elderly Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study

被引:3
|
作者
Zhu, Jianqin [2 ]
Wu, Zhenjun [3 ]
Huang, Guiming [1 ]
Zhong, Yuting [4 ]
Peng, Cheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Ganzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Ganzhou 341000, Peoples R China
[2] Ganzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Sleep Med, Ganzhou 341000, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Univ Chinese Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanning 530023, Peoples R China
[4] Gannan Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Ganzhou 341000, Peoples R China
关键词
Erector spinae plane block; Analgesic; Elderly patients; Posterior lumbar spine surgery; Propensity score matching; DISEASE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s40122-023-00527-9
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionFor preoperative analgesia during a variety of operations, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has grown in popularity. However, its effectiveness in lumbar surgery is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential benefits of ESPB in enhancing analgesic efficacy in elderly individuals following posterior lumbar spine surgery.MethodsPatients aged 65 years or older who underwent elective posterior lumbar instrumented fusion (with or without decompression) at our institution between January 2019 and June 2022 were included. Demographic data, comorbidities, and results of preoperative screening were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a ratio of 1:1 for control and ESPB groups. The primary outcome was opioid consumption at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at rest in the first 24 h. Additional secondary outcomes included number of patients requesting rescue analgesia, incidence of nausea and vomiting, time to the first request for analgesia via patient-controlled analgesia, and length of stay.ResultsA total of 382 patients were included, of whom 119 received ESPB. The mean age of the study patients was 70.6 years old, and 254 (66.5%) were male. After PSM, each group comprised 115 patients. Patients in the ESPB group showed a significantly lower opioid consumption at 24 h after surgery. Compared with the control group, VAS pain scores at rest in the first 24 h, number of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump compressions, ratio of patients requesting rescue analgesia, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and length of stay were significantly reduced in the ESPB group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding safety outcomes.ConclusionsESPB reduces short-term opioid consumption while providing safe and effective analgesia in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1037
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Belt Lipectomy Surgery
    Aysun Yıldız Altun
    İsmail Demirel
    Esef Bolat
    Serdar Altun
    Sibel Özcan
    Ahmet Aksu
    Ahmet Deniz
    Azize Beştaş
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020, 44 : 2137 - 2142
  • [32] Impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of 242 patients-an infographic
    Gupta, Rajnish K.
    Soffin, Ellen M.
    Schwenk, Eric S.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (02) : 87 - 88
  • [33] Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Wang Yi-han
    Tang Rong
    Li Jun
    Wang Min
    Zhang Yan
    Li Yi
    Liu Jie-ting
    Huang Sheng-hui
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [34] Ultrasound-guided low thoracic erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in an elderly patient undergoing emergency lumbar spine surgery
    Mistry, Tuhin
    Chaudhari, Noopur Prakash
    Sekar, Chelliah
    Senthilkumar, Balasubramanian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 71
  • [35] Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Wang Yi-han
    Tang Rong
    Li Jun
    Wang Min
    Zhang Yan
    Li Yi
    Liu Jie-ting
    Huang Sheng-hui
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [36] Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Paravertebral Block after Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Study
    Durey, Benjamin
    Djerada, Zoubir
    Boujibar, Fairuz
    Besnier, Emmanuel
    Montagne, Francois
    Baste, Jean-Marc
    Dusseaux, Marie-Melody
    Compere, Vincent
    Clavier, Thomas
    Selim, Jean
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [37] Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Analgesic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Metabolic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kuo-Chuan Hung
    Wei-Cheng Liu
    Chih-Wei Hsu
    Jheng-Yan Wu
    Shu-Wei Liao
    I-Wen Chen
    Obesity Surgery, 2025, 35 (3) : 1135 - 1145
  • [38] Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane blocks for lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Avis, Geoffrey
    Gricourt, Yann
    Vialatte, Pierre Baptiste
    Meunier, Victor
    Perin, Mikael
    Simon, Natacha
    Claret, Pierre-Geraud
    El Fertit, Hassan
    Lefrant, Jean-Yves
    Bertrand, Martin
    Cuvillon, Philippe
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (10) : 610 - 616
  • [39] Efficacy of erector spine plane block in two different approaches to lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a retrospective pilot study
    Birnbaums, Janis Verners
    Ozolina, Agnese
    Solovjovs, Leonids
    Glazniece-Kagane, Zane
    Nemme, Janis
    Logina, Inara
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [40] Comparison of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial
    Lal, Arpita
    Singh, Manish K.
    Kanaujia, Shashank Kumar
    Mishra, Neel Kamal
    Singh, Brijesh Pratap
    Singh, Gyan Prakash
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)