Superstar Exclusivity in Two-Sided Markets

被引:10
|
作者
Carroni, Elias [1 ]
Madio, Leonardo [2 ]
Shekhar, Shiva [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna 1, Dipartimento Sci Econom, Alma Mater Studiorum, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management, I-35123 Padua, Italy
[3] Tilburg Univ, TiSEM Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
exclusivity; platforms; two-sided markets; vertical integration; network externalities; VERTICAL INTEGRATION; COMPETITION; CONTRACTS; INFORMATION; INCUMBENCY; PLATFORM; BUYERS; ENTRY; PRICE;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2023.4720
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In most platform environments, the exclusive provision of premium content from leading creators (superstars) is used as a strategy to boost user participation and secure a competitive edge vis-a`-vis rivals. In this article, we study the impact of superstar exclusive content provision on platform competition and complementors' homing decisions. Two competing platforms facilitate interactions between consumers and suppliers, of which the latter are identified by the superstar and a fringe of complementors (e.g., independent developers, amateurs). When platform competition is intense, more consumers become affiliated with the platform favored by superstar exclusivity. This mechanism is self-reinforcing as it generates an entry cascade of complementors, and some complementors single home on the favored platform. We find that cross-group externalities are key in shaping market outcomes. First, exclusivity benefits complementors and might make consumers better off when cross-group externalities are large enough. Second, contrary to conventional wisdom, vertical integration (platform-superstar) may make exclusivity less likely than vertical separation under reasonable conditions. Finally, we discuss implications for the strategies of platform owners, managers of superstars and complementors, and antitrust enforcers.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1011
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PRICE DISCRIMINATION IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS
    Zhang, Kai
    Liu, Weiqi
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2016, 19 (01): : 1 - 17
  • [22] Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
    Rochet, Jean-Charles
    Tirole, Jean
    [J]. COMPETITION POLICY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 10 (02): : 181 - 218
  • [23] Tying and freebies in two-sided markets
    Amelio, Andrea
    Jullien, Bruno
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2012, 30 (05) : 436 - 446
  • [24] Diffusion of Innovation in Two-Sided Markets
    Hui, Ka Hung
    Subramanian, Vijay
    Guo, Dongning
    Berry, Randall
    [J]. 2012 50TH ANNUAL ALLERTON CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND COMPUTING (ALLERTON), 2012, : 426 - 433
  • [25] Switching Costs in Two-Sided Markets
    Lam, Wing Man Wynne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 65 (01): : 136 - 182
  • [26] Subgroup fairness in two-sided markets
    Zhou, Quan
    Marecek, Jakub
    Shorten, Robert
    Kumar, Ashwani
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [27] Asymmetric Networks in Two-Sided Markets
    Ambrus, Attila
    Argenziano, Rossella
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2009, 1 (01) : 17 - 52
  • [28] Optimal location in two-sided markets
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Lin, Yan-Shu
    Ohta, Hiroshi
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2013, 35 : 743 - 750
  • [29] Two-sided Airport Markets Reprised
    Starkie, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2021, 55 : 1 - 15
  • [30] Symposium on two-sided markets - Introduction
    Rochet, Jean-Charles
    Tirole, Jean
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03): : 643 - 644