Superstar Exclusivity in Two-Sided Markets

被引:10
|
作者
Carroni, Elias [1 ]
Madio, Leonardo [2 ]
Shekhar, Shiva [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna 1, Dipartimento Sci Econom, Alma Mater Studiorum, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management, I-35123 Padua, Italy
[3] Tilburg Univ, TiSEM Tilburg Sch Econ & Management, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
exclusivity; platforms; two-sided markets; vertical integration; network externalities; VERTICAL INTEGRATION; COMPETITION; CONTRACTS; INFORMATION; INCUMBENCY; PLATFORM; BUYERS; ENTRY; PRICE;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2023.4720
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In most platform environments, the exclusive provision of premium content from leading creators (superstars) is used as a strategy to boost user participation and secure a competitive edge vis-a`-vis rivals. In this article, we study the impact of superstar exclusive content provision on platform competition and complementors' homing decisions. Two competing platforms facilitate interactions between consumers and suppliers, of which the latter are identified by the superstar and a fringe of complementors (e.g., independent developers, amateurs). When platform competition is intense, more consumers become affiliated with the platform favored by superstar exclusivity. This mechanism is self-reinforcing as it generates an entry cascade of complementors, and some complementors single home on the favored platform. We find that cross-group externalities are key in shaping market outcomes. First, exclusivity benefits complementors and might make consumers better off when cross-group externalities are large enough. Second, contrary to conventional wisdom, vertical integration (platform-superstar) may make exclusivity less likely than vertical separation under reasonable conditions. Finally, we discuss implications for the strategies of platform owners, managers of superstars and complementors, and antitrust enforcers.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1011
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-Sided Markets
    Lee, Robin S.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (07): : 2960 - 3000
  • [2] The Power of Two-Sided Recruitment in Two-Sided Markets
    Cai, Yang
    Liaw, Christopher
    Mehta, Aranyak
    Zhao, Mingfei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, STOC 2024, 2024, : 201 - 212
  • [3] Two-Sided Markets
    King, Stephen P.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 46 (02) : 247 - 258
  • [4] Identifying Two-Sided Markets
    Filistrucchi, Lapo
    Geradin, Damien
    van Damme, Eric
    [J]. WORLD COMPETITION, 2013, 36 (01): : 33 - 59
  • [5] Competition in two-sided markets
    Armstrong, Mark
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03): : 668 - 691
  • [6] The Economics of Two-Sided Markets
    Rysman, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 23 (03): : 125 - 143
  • [7] Segmenting Two-Sided Markets
    Banerjee, Siddhartha
    Gollapudi, Sreenivas
    Kollias, Kostas
    Munaga, kamesh
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB (WWW'17), 2017, : 63 - 72
  • [8] EXPERIMENTATION IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS
    Peitz, Martin
    Rady, Sven
    Trepper, Piers
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2017, 15 (01) : 128 - 172
  • [9] Strategies for two-sided markets
    Eisenmann, Thomas
    Parker, Geoffrey
    Van Alstyne, Marshall W.
    [J]. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 84 (10) : 92 - +
  • [10] ANTITRUST AND COMPETITION IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS
    Alexandrov, Alexei
    Deltas, George
    Spulber, Daniel F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS, 2011, 7 (04) : 775 - 812