Facilitators and barriers to implementation of suicide prevention interventions: Scoping review

被引:7
|
作者
Kasal, Alexandr [1 ,2 ]
Taborska, Roksana [1 ]
Jurikova, Laura [1 ,3 ]
Grabenhofer-Eggerth, Alexander [4 ]
Pichler, Michaela [4 ]
Gruber, Beate [4 ]
Tomaskova, Hana [1 ,3 ]
Niederkrotenthaler, Thomas [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Dept Publ Mental Hlth, Klecany, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Arts, Dept Psychol, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Gesundheit Osterreich GmbH, Dept Psychosocial Hlth, Vienna, Austria
[5] Ctr Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Vienna, Austria
来源
关键词
suicide; self-harm; interventions; barriers; implementation; facilitators; SELF-HARM PREVENTION; MENTAL-HEALTH; PROGRAM; RISK; STRATEGIES; CARE; DEPRESSION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1017/gmh.2023.9
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
We know that suicide is preventable, yet hundreds of thousands of people still die due to suicide every year. Many interventions were proven to be effective, and dozens of others showed promising results. However, translating these interventions into new settings brings several challenges. One of the crucial obstacles to success is not anticipating possible barriers to implementation nor enhancing possible benefits of factors facilitating the implementation. While we witnessed great support for suicide prevention activities globally in the past years, implementation barriers and facilitating factors are yet to be comprehensively mapped to help implementation activities worldwide. This scoping review maps current knowledge on facilita-tors and barriers to the implementation of suicide prevention interventions while using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for classification. We included 64 studies. Barriers and facilitators were most commonly identified in the outer setting CFIR domain, namely in the sub-domain of patient needs and resources, which refers to the way in which these needs and resources are reflected by the reviewed interventions. The second most saturated CFIR domain for facilitators was intervention characteristics, where relative advan-tage, adaptability and cost of intervention sub-domains were equally represented. These sub-domains refer mostly to how the intervention is perceived by key stakeholders, to what extent it can be tailored to the implementation context and how much it costs. While intervention characteristics domain was the second most common also for barriers, the complexity sub-domain referring to high perceived difficulty of implementation was the most frequently represented. With reference to the results, we recommend adapting interventions to the needs of the target groups. Furthermore, carefully selecting the intervention to suit the target context concerning their adaptability, costs and complexity is vital for a successful implementation. Further implications for practice and research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementation of fall prevention in residential care facilities: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
    Vlaeyen, Ellen
    Stas, Joke
    Leysens, Greet
    Van der Elst, Elisa
    Janssens, Elise
    Dejaeger, Eddy
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    Milisen, Koen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 70 : 110 - 121
  • [42] Barriers and facilitators perceived by healthcare professionals for implementing lifestyle interventions in patients with osteoarthritis: a scoping review
    Bouma, Sjoukje E.
    van Beek, Juliette F. E.
    Diercks, Ron L.
    van der Woude, Lucas H., V
    Stevens, Martin
    Van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [43] Interventions, barriers, and facilitators associated with return to work for adults following stroke: a scoping review protocol
    Coutts, Emma
    Cooper, Kay
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (12) : 3332 - 3339
  • [44] Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study
    C. B. Hayes
    M. P. O’Shea
    C. Foley-Nolan
    M. McCarthy
    J. M. Harrington
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 19
  • [45] Psychosocial Interventions for Families with Parental Cancer and Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation and Use - A Systematic Review
    Inhestern, Laura
    Haller, Anne-Catherine
    Wlodarczyk, Olga
    Bergelt, Corinna
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [46] Men and suicide prevention: a scoping review
    Struszczyk, Sophia
    Galdas, Paul Michael
    Tiffin, Paul Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 28 (01) : 80 - 88
  • [47] Barriers and facilitators to perioperative smoking cessation: A scoping review
    Ofori, Sandra
    Rayner, Daniel
    Mikhail, David
    Borges, Flavia K.
    Marcucci, Maura M.
    Conen, David
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Devereaux, P. J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [48] Exploring the Facilitators and Barriers to Home Dialysis: A Scoping Review
    Sauve, Caroline
    Vandyk, Amanda Digel
    Bourbonnais, Frances Fothergill
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2016, 43 (04) : 295 - 308
  • [49] Barriers and Facilitators to Clinical Supervision in Ghana: A Scoping Review
    Awiagah, Sherrif Kwame
    Dordunu, Rebecca
    Hukporti, Nelson
    Nukunu, Promise Edem
    Dzando, Gideon
    [J]. SAGE OPEN NURSING, 2024, 10
  • [50] Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the advanced nurse practitioner role in primary care settings: A scoping review
    Torrens, Claire
    Campbell, Pauline
    Hoskins, Gaylor
    Strachan, Heather
    Wells, Mary
    Cunningham, Maggie
    Bottone, Hannah
    Polson, Rob
    Maxwell, Margaret
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 104