Estimating the runoff response from hillslopes treated with soil and water conservation structures in the semi-arid Ethiopian highlands: Is the curve number method applicable?

被引:3
|
作者
Taye, Gebeyehu [1 ,2 ]
Vanmaercke, Matthias [2 ]
van Wesemael, Bas [3 ]
Tesfaye, Samuale [1 ,4 ]
Teka, Daniel [1 ,3 ]
Nyssen, Jan [5 ]
Deckers, Jozef [2 ]
Poesen, Jean [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mekelle Univ, Dept Land Resources Management & Environm Protect, POB 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Georges Lemaitre Ctr Earth & Climate Res, Earth & Life Inst, Ottignies Louvain La Neuv, Belgium
[4] Wageningen Univ, Soil Phys & Land Management Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Ghent, Dept Geog, Ghent, Belgium
[6] Marie Curie Sklodowska Univ, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Lublin, Poland
关键词
Rangeland; Cropland; Water harvesting; Ethiopian highlands; Curve number method; LAND-USE; TIGRAY HIGHLANDS; STONE BUNDS; SEDIMENT DEPOSITION; NORTHERN ETHIOPIA; LOESS PLATEAU; EROSION; MODEL; VARIABILITY; CATCHMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01620
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Planning and management of water resources is crucial to enhance agricultural productivity and ensure food security in drylands. For this, adaptable and reliable runoff prediction models are urgently needed to support water harvesting and irrigation development. In this study we explored the potential of the runoff Curve Number (CN) method to estimate daily surface runoff from representative land use types and management conditions in Tigray (north Ethiopia). For this, we use the National Engineering Handbook (NEH-Tables) to derive CN values for runoff plots treated with and without soil and water conservation (SWC) structures. Moreover, the rainfall-runoff data collected from 21 large (60 0-10 0 0 m 2 ) runoff plots during three years (2010 to 2012) were used to calculate CNvalues. Results show that CN values derived from the NEH-Tables are larger by 21% compared to those values calculated from plot data. The calculated CN values vary widely (34 to 91) in response to land use type, slope gradient, and applied SWC structures. Our results show that land use and SWC structures strongly influence runoff production. Considering plots with otherwise similar characteristics, CN values are consistently larger for rangeland sites as compared to those values for cropland sites. Likewise, SWC structures greatly reduce runoff production and their presence also leads to a clearly lower performance of the CN model. The results of this study are relevant contributions towards addressing several goals of agenda 2063 of the African union either directly or indirectly and also international sustainable development goals (SDG). Based on our analysis and field observations, we propose calibrated CN values that may be used for runoff yield assessments in similar environments.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of African Institute of ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] A comparison of curve number based methods for runoff estimation from small watersheds in a semi-arid region of India
    Ali, Shakir
    Sharda, V. N.
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (03): : 191 - 200
  • [12] An Integrated Approach of Soil–Erosion Modeling for Soil and Water Conservation Planning in a Degraded Semi–Arid Environment of Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopian Highlands
    Amanuel Zenebe
    Eskinder Gidey
    Solomon Hishe
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2023, 9 : 1741 - 1757
  • [13] Integrated impact assessment of soil and water conservation structures on runoff and sediment yield through measurements and modeling in the Northern Ethiopian highlands
    Melaku, Nigus Demelash
    Renschler, Chris S.
    Flagler, Jared
    Bayu, Wondimu
    Klik, Andreas
    CATENA, 2018, 169 : 140 - 150
  • [14] Long-term effectiveness of indigenous and introduced soil and water conservation measures in soil loss and slope gradient reductions in the semi-arid Ethiopian lowlands
    Mukai, Shiro
    Billi, Paolo
    Haregeweyn, Nigussie
    Hordofa, Tilahun
    GEODERMA, 2021, 382
  • [15] A two-step up-scaling method for mapping runoff and sediment production from pasture and woody encroachment on semi-arid hillslopes
    Munoz-Robles, Carlos
    Tighe, Matthew
    Reid, Nick
    Frazier, Paul
    Briggs, Sue V.
    Wilson, Brian
    ECOHYDROLOGY, 2013, 6 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [16] Impact of soil and water conservation structures on the spatial variability of topsoil moisture content and crop productivity in semi-arid Ethiopia
    Taye, Gebeyehu
    Tesfaye, Samuale
    Van Parijs, Inge
    Poesen, Jean
    Vanmaercke, Matthias
    van Wesemael, Bas
    Guyassaa, Etefa
    Nyssen, Jan
    Deckers, Jozef
    Haregeweyn, Nigussie
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2024, 238
  • [17] Improving runoff estimation by raster-based Natural Resources Conservation Service-Curve Number adjustment for a new initial abstraction ratio in semi-arid climates
    Akbari, Abolghasem
    Daryabor, Farshid
    Abu Samah, Azizan
    Aliakbarkhani, Zahra Shirmohammadi
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 37 (09) : 1333 - 1342
  • [18] Modelling the benefits of soil water conservation using the PARCH model - a case study from a semi-arid region of Kenya
    Stephens, W
    Hess, TM
    JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1999, 41 (03) : 335 - 344
  • [19] Effects of selected soil and water conservation techniques on runoff, sediment yield and maize productivity under sub-humid and semi-arid conditions in Kenya
    Ngetich, K. F.
    Diels, J.
    Shisanya, C. A.
    Mugwe, J. N.
    Mucheru-muna, M.
    Mugendi, D. N.
    CATENA, 2014, 121 : 288 - 296
  • [20] Surface runoff estimation over heterogeneous foothills of Aravalli mountain using medium resolution remote sensing rainfall data with soil conservation system-curve number method: A case of semi-arid ungauged Manesar Nala watershed
    Rawat, Kishan Singh
    Mishra, Anil Kumar
    Ahmad, Nayan
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 31 (02) : 262 - 276