Neonatal head circumference as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Raihan, Fatimah Sarah Mohd [1 ]
Kusuma, Julianty [2 ,3 ]
Nasution, Ahmad Azmi [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bengkulu, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Bengkulu, Indonesia
[2] Dr M Yunus Reg Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bengkulu, Indonesia
[3] Univ Bengkulu, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Med Doctor Profess Educ, Bengkulu, Indonesia
[4] Univ Bengkulu, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Anat, Bengkulu, Indonesia
关键词
delivery; neonatal head circumference; obstetric anal sphincter injuries; parity status; age; Asian race; diabetes; TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND; BIRTH-WEIGHT; EPISIOTOMY; OASIS; ASSOCIATION; INCONTINENCE; LACERATIONS; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; ETHNICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101047
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Between 53% and 79% of women will sustain some degree of perineal laceration during vaginal delivery. Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations are known as obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Timely diagnosis and prompt treatment of obstetric anal sphincter injuries can help to prevent the development of severe consequences like fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and rectovaginal fistula. Neonatal head circumference is routinely measured postpartum but is often not mentioned as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in clinical guidelines. Thus far, no review article on the risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries has discussed the role of neonatal head circumference. This study aimed to review and analyze the relationship between head circumference and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries among previous studies to conclude whether head circumference should be recognized as an important risk factor.DATA SOURCES: Through study screening on Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct for articles published between 2013 to 2023, followed by assessment of eligibility, this study ended up reviewing 25 studies, 17 of which were included in the meta-analysis.STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only studies that reported both the neonatal head circumference and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries were included in this review. METHODS: The included studies were appraised using the Dartmouth Library risk of bias assessment checklist. Qualitative synthesis was based on the study population, findings, adjusted confounding factors, and suggested causative links in each study. Quantitative synthesis was conducted using calculation and pooling of odds ratios and inverse variance using Review Manager 5.4.1.RESULTS: A statistically significant association between head circumference and obstetric anal sphincter injuries was reported in 21 of 25 studies; 4 studies reported that head circumference was a true independent risk factor. A meta-analysis of the studies that reported neonatal head circumference as a dichotomous categorical variable with a cutoff point of 35 +/- 1 cm yielded statistically significant pooled results (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, CONCLUSION: The risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries increased as the neonatal head circumference increased-this should be considered in decision-making during labor and postpartum management to attain the best outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Obstetric anal sphincter injury events prior and after Episcissors-60 implementation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kastora, Stavroula
    Kounidas, Georgios
    Triantafyllidou, Olga
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 265 : 175 - 180
  • [32] The use of metronidazole in women undergoing obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a systematic review of the literature
    Rotem, Reut
    Mastrolia, Salvatore Andrea
    Rottenstreich, Misgav
    Yohay, David
    Weintraub, Adi Y.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2020, 302 (02) : 321 - 328
  • [33] Maternal origin matters: Country of birth as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries
    Andre, Kristin
    Stuart, Andrea
    Kallen, Karin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 166 (01) : 426 - 434
  • [34] Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries after Labor Induction
    Salinas, Melissa A.
    Potarazu, Savita
    Rahman, Sara
    Lee, Do H.
    Deaton, Lydia
    Whitley, Julia
    Hill, Devin
    Chea-Howard, Kharastin L.
    Bryson, Ciara
    Carter-Brooks, Charelle M.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 5 (03): : 172 - 180
  • [35] Trends in Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Norway
    Baghestan, Elham
    Irgens, Lorentz M.
    Bordahl, Per E.
    Rasmussen, Svein
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01): : 25 - 33
  • [36] The role of fetal head circumference in the formation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following vacuum deliveries among primiparous women
    Meyer, Raanan
    Rottenstreich, Amihai
    Shapira, Moran
    Alcalay, Menachem
    Ram, Edward
    Yinon, Yoav
    Levin, Gabriel
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2020, 301 (06) : 1423 - 1429
  • [37] The role of fetal head circumference in the formation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following vacuum deliveries among primiparous women
    Raanan Meyer
    Amihai Rottenstreich
    Moran Shapira
    Menachem Alcalay
    Edward Ram
    Yoav Yinon
    Gabriel Levin
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2020, 301 : 1423 - 1429
  • [38] OBSTETRIC ANAL SPHINCTER INJURIES: RISK FACTORS AND IMPACTS OF INCONTINENCE
    Dilgir, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 : S230 - S230
  • [39] Risk Factors for the Development of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Modern Obstetric Practice
    Ramm, Olga
    Woo, Victoria G.
    Hung, Yun-Yi
    Chen, Hsuan-Chih
    Weintraub, Miranda L. Ritterman
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (02): : 290 - 296
  • [40] The use of Episcissors-60 to reduce the rate of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A systematic review
    Cole, Jennifer
    Lacey, Lauren
    Bulchandani, Supriya
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 237 : 23 - 27