Life Cycle Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis as Combined Economic-Environmental Assessment Tools: Application to an Anaerobic Digestion Plant

被引:4
|
作者
Bruno, Morena [1 ]
Marchi, Michela [1 ]
Ermini, Nicolo [2 ]
Niccolucci, Valentina [1 ]
Pulselli, Federico Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Phys Sci Earth & Environm, Ecodynam Grp, Piazzetta Enzo Tiezzi 1, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Econ & Stat, Piazza San Francesco 7-8, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
carbon footprint; cost benefit analysis; economic-environmental assessment; anaerobic digestion; biogas; environmental externality; ELECTRICITY; EMISSIONS; GENERATION; FRAMEWORK; WASTE; POWER;
D O I
10.3390/en16093686
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the present study, using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA), we assess the economic-environmental performance of an anaerobic digestion (AD) plant, fed by cultured crops (i.e., maize and wheat), in Italy. The biogas generated by the AD plant is used for the production of electricity, imputed into the Italian energy grid. The LCA evaluated potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, measured via Carbon Footprint (CF), while the CBA analysed the financial and economic profiles via the Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) indicators. The strength of combining these methodologies is the joint examination of the financial and social-environmental performance of the plant. The results of the CBA are complemented with the GHG emissions avoided by producing electricity from biogas. The CF of 0.28 kg CO(2)eq.kWh(-1) of electricity produced is mainly due to the nitrogen fertilizers involved in the production of the additional feedstock matrix (i.e., maize flour). In the CBA, the negative financial NPV and the financial IRR, which is lower than the discount rate applied, highlight the inability of the net revenue to repay the initial investment. Regarding the social desirability, the economic analysis, enriched by the LCA outcomes, shows a positive economic performance, demonstrating that the combination of information from different methodologies enables wider consideration for the anaerobic digestion plant. In line with the Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan's aim to strongly increase the exploitation of renewable resources, an AD plant fed by dedicated crops could valorise the marginal uncultivated land, obtaining energy without consuming land for food production. Moreover, this AD plant could contribute to the creation of repeatable small-scale energy production systems able to sustain the demand of local communities.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating life-cycle assessment into transport cost-benefit analysis
    Manzo, Stefano
    Salling, Kim Bang
    [J]. TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 273 - 282
  • [2] The life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis for nature friendly river works
    Kobayashi, K
    Chonan, M
    Matsuzaki, H
    Shirakawa, N
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF SURFACE AND GROUND WATER RESOURCES, THEME A, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 215 - 220
  • [3] The Role of Cost-benefit Analysis and Economic Impact Analysis in Environmental Assessment: The Case for Reform
    Joseph, Chris
    Gunton, Thomas
    Knowler, Duncan
    Broadbent, Sean
    [J]. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2020, 38 (06) : 491 - 501
  • [4] Friends or foes? Monetized Life Cycle Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the site remediation of a former gas plant
    Huysegoms, Lies
    Rousseau, Sandra
    Cappuyns, Valerie
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 619 : 258 - 271
  • [5] Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of small-scale anaerobic digestion system treating food waste onsite under different operational conditions
    Tian, Hailin
    Ee, Alvin W. L.
    Yan, Miao
    Tiong, Yong Wei
    Tan, Wenxia
    Tan, Qian
    Lam, Heng Thong
    Zhang, Jingxin
    Tong, Yen Wah
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 390
  • [6] Socio-economic and environmental cost-benefit analysis of passive houses: A life cycle perspective
    Jayasena, Amindha
    Hewage, Kasun
    Siddiqui, Osamah
    Sadiq, Rehan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 373
  • [7] Quality-of-Life and Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Home Environmental Assessment Program in Connecticut
    Nguyen, Kimberly H.
    Boulay, Eileen
    Peng, Justin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2011, 48 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [8] Integrating life cycle assessment and material flow cost accounting to account for resource productivity and economic-environmental performance
    Ramona Rieckhof
    Edeltraud Guenther
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1491 - 1506
  • [9] THE APPLICATION OF COST-BENEFIT DOMINANCE ANALYSIS TO THE ASSESSMENT OF FARM ANIMAL QUALITY-OF-LIFE
    TAYLOR, AA
    HURNIK, JF
    LEHMAN, H
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1995, 35 (03) : 313 - 329
  • [10] Integrating life cycle assessment and material flow cost accounting to account for resource productivity and economic-environmental performance
    Rieckhof, Ramona
    Guenther, Edeltraud
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (07): : 1491 - 1506