Efficacy and Safety of Lianhua Qingwen for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
SUN Xiao-hu [1 ,2 ]
ZHANG Shuo [3 ]
YANG Zhen [4 ]
CHEN Zhen-lin [5 ]
YUE Shi-jun [1 ]
ZHANG Sai [1 ]
TANG Yu-ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Traditional Chinese Medicine Compatibility, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine
[2] School of Public Health, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine
[3] International Programs Office, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine
[4] Nanjing Bestform Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.
[5] Cardiovascular Department, Guang'anmen Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R259 [现代医学内科疾病];
学科分类号
100506 ;
摘要
Background: Corona virus disease 2019(COVID-19) has spread around the world since its outbreak, and there is no ascertained effective drug up to now. Lianhua Qingwen(LHQW) has been widely used in China and overseas Chinese, which had some advantages in the treatment of COVID-19. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LHQW for COVID-19 by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in 12 electronic databases from their establishment to October 30, 2021. Note Express 3.2.0 was used for screening of trials, and the data was independently extracted in duplicate by 2 researchers. The risk of bias of randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and retrospective studies were assessed by using the Cochrane collaboration tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale, respectively, followed by data analysis using RevMan 5.3. The RCTs or retrospective studies to treat COVID-19 using LHQW were included. The intervention measures in the experimental group were LHQW alone or combined with chemical drugs(LCWC), and that in the control group were chemical drugs(CDs). Outcome measures included computed tomography(CT) recovery rate, disappearance rates of primary(fever, cough, fatigue), respiratory, gastrointestinal and other symptoms, exacerbation rate and adverse reaction. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to whether LHQW was combined with CDs and the different treatment methods in the control group. Results: Nine trials with 1,152 participants with COVID-19 were included. The CT recovery rates of LHQW and LCWC were 1.36 and 1.32 times of CDs, respectively(P<0.05). Compared with CDs, LCWC remarkably increased the disappearance rates of fever, cough, fatigue, expectoration, shortness of breath, and muscle soreness(P<0.05). LHQW also obviously decreased the exacerbation rate, which was 0.45 times of CDs alone(P<0.05). There was no obvious difference between LCWC and CDs in adverse reaction(P>0.05). Conclusions: LHQW was more suitable for treating COVID-19 patients with obvious expectoration, shortness of breath and muscle soreness. LHQW had advantages in treating COVID-19 with no obvious exacerbation.(PROSPERO No. CRD42021235937)
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 660
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids use in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    He, Qiaolan
    Wang, Chen
    Wang, Yingqin
    Chen, Guannan
    Zhou, Yue
    Wu, Yuanyuan
    Zhong, Ming
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Efficacy and Safety of Convalescence Plasma Therapy in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dai, Rongjuan
    Hu, Minjie
    Tang, Haibo
    Peng, Zhongtian
    Yan, Cai
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [43] Safety and efficacy of melatonin as an adjuvant therapy in COVID-19 patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Taha, Amira Mohamed
    Saed, Sara Adel Abdelkader
    Moawad, Mostafa Hossam-Eldin
    Moawad, Wesam Abd El-Tawab
    Al-hejazi, Tala
    Mousa, Yosra
    Sharma, Ramaswamy
    Reiter, Russel J.
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (02): : 341 - 352
  • [44] Efficacy and Safety of Respiratory Telerehabilitation in Patients with Long COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Calvache-Mateo, Andres
    Heredia-Ciuro, Alejandro
    Martin-Nunez, Javier
    Hernandez-Hernandez, Sofia
    Reychler, Gregory
    Lopez-Lopez, Laura
    Valenza, Marie Carmen
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (18)
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in hospitalized Covid-19 patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis including network meta-analysis
    Elsawah, Hozaifa Khalil
    Elsokary, Mohamed Ahmed
    Abdallah, Mahmoud Samy
    ElShafie, Ahmed Hanei
    REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 31 (04)
  • [46] Efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen granule combined with azithromycin for mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Li, Jiawei
    Ma, Yuqi
    Qi, Jiawen
    Hao, Yule
    Wang, Yiming
    Wu, Yeke
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of sotrovimab in patients with COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis
    Amani, Bahman
    Amani, Behnam
    REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 32 (06)
  • [48] The Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Patients With COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xueyang
    Shang, Lianhan
    Fan, Guohui
    Gu, Xiaoying
    Xu, Jiuyang
    Wang, Yeming
    Huang, Lixue
    Cao, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 8
  • [49] Safety and efficacy of colchicine in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
    Yasmin, Farah
    Najeeb, Hala
    Moeed, Abdul
    Hassan, Wardah
    Khatri, Mahima
    Asghar, Muhammad Sohaib
    Naveed, Ahmed Kunwer
    Ullah, Waqas
    Surani, Salim
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [50] Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hariyanto, Timotius Ivan
    Hardyson, Willie
    Kurniawan, Andree
    DRUG RESEARCH, 2021, 71 (05) : 265 - 274