Preoperative single-bolus high-dose antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy in sensitized renal transplant recipients

被引:0
|
作者
WANG Dong
机构
关键词
kidney transplantation; graft rejection; antilymphocyte serum; immunization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R699 [泌尿及男性生殖系外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background Immunological sensitization remains a major problem following renal transplantation. There is no consensus for the management of sensitized renal allograft recipients. The patients become tethered to dialysis while waiting for compatible donors. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative single- bolus high-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as induction therapy in sensitized renal transplant recipients. Methods A total of 56 patients were divided into two groups according to the level of panel reactive antibody (PRA): non-sensitized group (PRA<10%, n=30) and sensitized group (PRA≥10%, n=26). The characteristics of the recipients and donors were comparable between the two groups. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1 g) or ATG (iv. 9 mg/kg) were given preoperatively in the two groups as induction therapy. After the transplantation, the patients were treated with standard triple therapy regimen consisting of tacrolimus (FK-506) or cyclosporine A, MMF, and prednisolone. Acute rejection (AR) and infection episodes were recorded and renal function was monitored during a 12-month follow-up. χ2 test and t test were used to analyze the data. Results During the follow-up, 6 patients (20.0%) suffered AR episodes in the non-sensitized group and 4 (15.4%) in the sensitized group (P=0.737); 8 patients (26.7%) experienced 11 infection episodes (average, 1.4 episodes per infected patient) in the non-sensitized group, and 6 (23.1%) experienced 10 infection episodes (average, 1.7 episodes per infected patient) in the sensitized group (P=0.757, 0.890). The safety of the drugs, which was assessed by the occurrence of side effects, was comparable between the two groups. The hospital stay was 13-25 days (mean, 16.7±3.3) in the non-sensitized group and 14-29 days (mean, 16.2±3.1) in the sensitized group, respectively (P=0.563). No delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in all the patients. Both the 12-month actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 100% in the two groups. Conclusion Preoperative single-bolus high-dose ATG is an effective and safe induction therapy yielding acceptable acute rejection rate in sensitized renal transplant recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1688
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Standard and High Dose Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction on Renal Allograft Outcomes in High Risk Recipients with Slow Graft Function
    Ally, Winston A.
    Duhart, Benjamin
    Krauss, Amy G.
    Patel, Samir J.
    Mya, Maung
    Eason, James
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 : 30 - 30
  • [32] REFRACTORY APLASTIC-ANEMIA - CONCOMITANT THERAPY WITH ANTITHYMOCYTE GLOBULIN AND HIGH-DOSE CORTICOSTEROIDS
    PULVER, KP
    FLAUM, MA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 1987, 25 (01) : 95 - 100
  • [33] Induction Treatment with Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin versus Basiliximab in Renal Transplant Recipients with Planned Early Steroid Withdrawal
    Gabardi, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 574 - 574
  • [34] Induction Treatment with Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin versus Basiliximab in Renal Transplant Recipients with Planned Early Steroid Withdrawal
    Martin, Spencer T.
    Roberts, Keri L.
    Malek, Sayeed K.
    Tullius, Stefan G.
    Vadivel, Nidyanandh
    De Serres, Sacha
    Grafals, Monica
    Elsanjak, Abdelaziz
    Filkins, Beth Anne
    Chandraker, Anil
    Gabardi, Steven
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 31 (06): : 566 - 573
  • [35] COMPARISON OF EFFECTS OF INDUCTION THERAPY WITH ALEMTUZUMAB VERSUS ANTITHYMOCYTE GLOBULIN AMONG HIGHLY SENSITIZED KIDNEY TRANSPLANT CANDIDATE
    Shamsaeefar, Alireza
    Shamsaeefar, Alireza
    Roozbeh, Jamshid
    Khajerezae, Soraya
    Nikeghbalian, Saman
    Kazemi, Kourosh
    Motazedian, Nasrin
    Motazedian, Nadia
    Ali, Seyed Ali Malekhosseini Seyed
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 209 - 209
  • [36] A three-arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy followed by tacrolimus or cyclosporine A in adult renal transplant recipients
    Charpentier, B
    Rostaing, L
    Berthoux, F
    Lang, P
    Civati, G
    Touraine, JL
    Squifflet, JP
    Vialtel, P
    Abramowicz, D
    Mourad, G
    Wolf, P
    Cassuto, E
    Moulin, B
    Rifle, G
    Pruna, A
    Merville, P
    Mignon, F
    Legendre, C
    Le Pogamp, P
    Lebranchu, Y
    Toupance, O
    de Ligny, BH
    Touchard, G
    Olmer, M
    Purgus, R
    Pouteil-Noble, C
    Glotz, D
    Bourbigot, B
    Leski, M
    Wauters, JP
    Kessler, M
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (06) : 844 - 851
  • [37] Comparison of Renal Outcomes for Liver Transplant Recipients With Pretransplant Renal Dysfunction Receiving Sirolimus Or Tacrolimus With Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction
    Duhart, B.
    Ally, W.
    Rao, V.
    Krauss, A.
    Eason, J.
    Vanatta, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15
  • [38] Low Immunologic Risk Living Related Renal Transplant Using Very Low-Dose Antithymocyte Globulin as Induction Therapy: A Single Tertiary Hospital Experience
    Jalalonmuhali, Maisarah
    Ng, Kok Peng
    Ong, Chun Seong
    Lee, Yee Wan
    Adnan, Wan Ahmad Hafiz Wan Md
    Lim, Soo Kun
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (06) : 1709 - 1714
  • [39] High-dose individualized antithymocyte globulin with therapeutic drug monitoring in high-risk cord blood transplant
    Admiraal, Rick
    Versluijs, A. Birgitta
    Huitema, Alwin D. R.
    Ebskamp, Lysette
    Lacna, Amelia
    de Kanter, C. T.
    Bierings, Marc B.
    Boelens, Jaap Jan
    Lindemans, Caroline A.
    Nierkens, Stefan
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2024, 26 (06) : 599 - 605
  • [40] Induction with Single Dose Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG) in Non-Sensitized Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
    Goplani, K. R.
    Aziz, F.
    Patwari, D.
    Mavani, S.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (10) : 610 - 610