Single-port versus multi-port cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis: a retrospective comparative analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Dietmar Jacob [1 ]
Roland Raakow [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vivantes Hospital Spandau, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585 Berlin, Germany
[2] Department of Surgery, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Dieffenbachstrasse 1, 10967 Berlin, Germany
关键词
laparoscopic surgery; single-port; cholecystectomy; acute cholecystitis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.4 [胆囊、胆管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic gallbladder disease is becoming increasingly accepted worldwide. But so far, no reports exist about the challenging single-port surgery for acute cholecystitis. The objective of this study was to describe our experience with single-port cholecystectomy in comparison to the conventional laparoscopic technique. METHODS: Between August 2008 and March 2010, 73 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease and histopathological signs of acute cholecystitis underwent laparoscopic cholecystec- tomy at our institution. Thirty-six patients were operated on with the single-port technique (SP group) and the data were compared with a control group of 37 patients who were treated with the multi-port technique (MP group). RESULTS: The mean age in the SP group was 61.5 (range 21-81) years and in the MP group was 60 (range 21-94) (P=0.712). Gender, ASA status and BMI were not significantly different. The number of white blood cells was different before [SP: 9.2 (range 2.8-78.4); MP: 13.2 (range 4.4-28.6); P=0.001] and after the operation [SP: 7.8 (range 3.5-184.8); MP: 11.1 (range 5-20.8); P=0.002]. Mean operating time was 88 (range 34-174) minutes in the SP group vs 94 (range 39-209) minutes in the MP group (P=0.147). Four patients (5%) required conversion to an open procedure (SP: 1; MP: 3; P=0.320). During the follow- up period of 332 (range 29-570) days in the SP group and 428 (range 111-619) days in the MP group (P=0.044), eleven (15%) patients developed postoperative complications (P=0.745) and two patients in the SP group required reoperation (P=0.154). CONCLUSIONS: Trans-umbilical single-port cholecystectomy for beginning acute cholecystitis is feasible and the complicationrate is comparable with the standard multi-port operation. In spite of our good results, these operations are difficult to perform and should only be done in high-volume centers for laparoscopic surgery with experience in single-port surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 525
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-port versus multi-port totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Prassas, Dimitrios
    Rolfs, Thomas Marten
    Vaghiri, Sascha
    Kounnamas, Aristodemos
    Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo
    Krieg, Andreas
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (45) : E30820
  • [42] Single Port Versus Multiple Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy—A Comparative Study
    A. Sharma
    V. Soni
    M. Baijal
    R. Khullar
    K. Najma
    P. K. Chowbey
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2013, 75 : 115 - 122
  • [43] Single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Ning
    Zhang, Jialin
    Zhang, Chengshuo
    Shi, Yue
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 216 (06): : 1205 - 1211
  • [44] Single-port versus multi-port robotic sacrocervicopexy: Establishment Chock for of a learning curve and short-term outcomes
    Lauterbach, Roy
    Mustafa-Mikhail, Susana
    Matanes, Emad
    Amit, Amnon
    Wiener, Zeev
    Lowenstein, Lior
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 239 : 1 - 6
  • [45] Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Terra Junior, Juverson Alves
    Terra, Guilherme Azevedo
    Borges, Marisa de Carvalho
    Takeuti, Tharsus Dias
    Pereira Castro, Luciana Garcia
    Lima, Simone Souza
    Rodrigues Martinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda
    da Silva, Alex Augusto
    Crema, Eduardo
    [J]. ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 32 (06) : 475 - 481
  • [46] Long-term Experience of Single-port and Multi-port Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Single Center
    Lee, J. U. H. U. N.
    Lee, Yoon Soon
    Hong, Dae Gy
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2022, 36 (05): : 2409 - 2413
  • [47] Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Langwieler, Thomas E.
    Nimmesgern, Thomas
    Back, Melanie
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (05): : 1138 - 1141
  • [48] Single-port Cholecystectomy and Quality of Life
    Michael Cotton
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 264 - 264
  • [49] Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Thomas E. Langwieler
    Thomas Nimmesgern
    Melanie Back
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 1138 - 1141
  • [50] The Learning Curve With Single-Port Cholecystectomy
    Kravetz, Amanda J.
    Iddings, Douglas
    Basson, Marc D.
    Kia, Michael A.
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2009, 13 (03) : 332 - 336