Reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy:Pancreatojejunostomy vs pancreatogastrostomy

被引:3
|
作者
Tatiana Gómez [1 ]
Ana Palomares [2 ]
Mario Serradilla [2 ]
Luis Tejedor [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery,Hospital Punta de Europa
[2] Division of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery,Department of Surgery,Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén
关键词
Pancreatoduodenectomy; Pancreatojeju-nostomy; Pancreatogastrostomy; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreatic cancer; Surgical technique;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.9 [胰腺肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Pancreatic surgeons try to find the best technique for reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy(PD) in order to decrease postoperative complications,mainly pancreatic fistulas(PF).In this work,we compare the two most frequent techniques of reconstruction after PD,pancreatojejunostomy(PJ) and pancreatogastrostomy(PG),in order to determine which of the two is better.A systematic review of the literature was performed,including major meta-analysis articles,clinical randomized trials,systematic reviews,and retrospective studies.A total of 64 articles were finally included.PJ and PG are usually responsible for most of the postoperative morbidity,mainly due to the onset of PF,being considered a major trigger of life-threatening complications such as intra-abdominal abscess and hemorrhagia.The included systematic reviews reported a significant difference only in the incidence of intraabdominal collections favouring PG.PF,delayed gastric emptying and mortality were not different.Although there was heterogeneity between these studies,all were conducted in specialized centers by highly experienced surgeons,and the surgical care was likely to be similar for all the studies.The disadvantages of PG include an increased incidence of delayed gastric emptying and of main pancreatic duct obstruction due to overgrowth by the gastric mucosa.Exocrine function appears to be worse after PG than after PJ,resulting in severe atrophic changes in the remnant pancreas.Depending on the type of PJ or PG used,the PF rate and other complications can also be different.The best method to deal with the pancreatic stump after PD remains questionable.The choice of method of pancreatic anastomosis could be based on individual experience and on the surgeon’s preference and adherence to basic principles such as good exposure and visualization.In conclusion,up to now none of the techniques can be considered superior or be recommended as standard for reconstruction after PD.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 376
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of Life and Functional Long-Term Outcome After Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy: Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy
    Ursula Schmidt
    Denis Simunec
    Pompiliu Piso
    Jürgen Klempnauer
    Hans J. Schlitt MD
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2005, 12 : 467 - 472
  • [22] Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767) Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Keck, Tobias
    Wellner, U. F.
    Bahra, M.
    Klein, F.
    Sick, O.
    Niedergethmann, M.
    Wilhelm, T. J.
    Farkas, S. A.
    Boerner, T.
    Bruns, C.
    Kleespies, A.
    Kleeff, J.
    Mihaljevic, A. L.
    Uhl, W.
    Chromik, A.
    Fendrich, V.
    Heeger, K.
    Padberg, W.
    Hecker, A.
    Neumann, U. P.
    Junge, K.
    Kalff, J. C.
    Glowka, T. R.
    Werner, J.
    Knebel, P.
    Piso, P.
    Mayr, M.
    Izbicki, J.
    Vashist, Y.
    Bronsert, P.
    Bruckner, T.
    Limprecht, R.
    Diener, M. K.
    Rossion, I.
    Wegener, I.
    Hopt, U. T.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (03) : 440 - 449
  • [23] Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Qiu, Jianguo
    Du, Chengyou
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 266 (06) : E63 - E64
  • [24] Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after partial PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial UTN U1111-1117-9588
    Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich
    Brett, Sabine
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Limprecht, Ronald
    Rossion, Inga
    Seiler, Christoph
    Sick, Olivia
    Wegener, Inga
    Hopt, Ulrich Theodor
    Keck, Tobias
    TRIALS, 2012, 13
  • [25] Management and outcomes of haemorrhage after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy
    Eckardt, A. J.
    Klein, F.
    Adler, A.
    Veltzke-Schlieker, W.
    Warnick, P.
    Bahra, M.
    Wiedenmann, B.
    Neuhaus, P.
    Neumann, K.
    Glanemann, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (11) : 1599 - 1607
  • [26] Pancreatogastrostomy With Gastric Partition After Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy Versus Conventional Pancreatojejunostomy A Prospective Randomized Study
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Cosa, Rebeca
    Blanco, Laia
    Lopez-Boado, Miguel Angel
    Astudillo, Emiliano
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (06) : 930 - 938
  • [27] Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after partial PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial UTN U1111-1117-9588
    Ulrich Friedrich Wellner
    Sabine Brett
    Thomas Bruckner
    Ronald Limprecht
    Inga Rossion
    Christoph Seiler
    Olivia Sick
    Inga Wegener
    Ulrich Theodor Hopt
    Tobias Keck
    Trials, 13
  • [28] Pancreatogastrostomy vs pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of RCTs and our experience
    Jin, Yun
    Feng, Yang-Yang
    Qi, Xiao-Gang
    Hao, Geng
    Yu, Yuan-Quan
    Li, Jiang-Tao
    Peng, Shu-You
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 11 (07): : 322 - 332
  • [29] Pancreatogastrostomy Vs. Pancreatojejunostomy: a Risk-Stratified Analysis of 5316 Pancreatoduodenectomies
    Ecker, Brett L.
    McMillan, Matthew T.
    Maggino, Laura
    Allegrini, Valentina
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Ball, Chad G.
    Bassi, Claudio
    Beane, Joal D.
    Behrman, Stephen W.
    Berger, Adam C.
    Bloomston, Mark
    Callery, Mark P.
    Christein, John D.
    Dickson, Euan
    Dixon, Elijah
    Drebin, Jeffrey A.
    Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos
    Fisher, William E.
    Fong, Zhi Ven
    Haverick, Ericka
    Hollis, Robert H.
    House, Michael G.
    Hughes, Steven J.
    Jamieson, Nigel B.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Kowalsky, Stacy J.
    Kunstman, John W.
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Salem, Ronald R.
    Soares, Kevin C.
    Valero, Vicente, III
    Watkins, Ammara A.
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    Vollmer, Charles M., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (01) : 68 - 76
  • [30] Pancreatogastrostomy Vs. Pancreatojejunostomy: a Risk-Stratified Analysis of 5316 Pancreatoduodenectomies
    Brett L. Ecker
    Matthew T. McMillan
    Laura Maggino
    Valentina Allegrini
    Horacio J. Asbun
    Chad G. Ball
    Claudio Bassi
    Joal D. Beane
    Stephen W. Behrman
    Adam C. Berger
    Mark Bloomston
    Mark P. Callery
    John D. Christein
    Euan Dickson
    Elijah Dixon
    Jeffrey A. Drebin
    Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo
    William E. Fisher
    Zhi Ven Fong
    Ericka Haverick
    Robert H. Hollis
    Michael G. House
    Steven J. Hughes
    Nigel B. Jamieson
    Tara S. Kent
    Stacy J. Kowalsky
    John W. Kunstman
    Giuseppe Malleo
    Ronald R. Salem
    Kevin C. Soares
    Vicente Valero
    Ammara A. Watkins
    Christopher L. Wolfgang
    Amer H. Zureikat
    Charles M. Vollmer
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2018, 22 : 68 - 76