Evaluating newer generation intraocular lens calculation formulas in manual versus femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

AIM: To determine the refractive accuracy of the Haigis,Barrett Universal II(Barrett), and Hill-radial basis function 2.0(Hill-RBF) intraocular lens(IOL) power calculations formulas in eyes undergoing manual cataract surgery(MCS)and refractive femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery(Re LACS).METHODS: This was a REB-approved, retrospective interventional comparative case series of 158 eyes of 158 patients who had preoperative biometry completed using the IOL Master 700 and underwent implantation of a Tecnis IOL following uncomplicated cataract surgery using either MCS or ReLACS. Target spherical equivalence(SE) was predicted using the Haigis, Barrett, and Hill-RBF formulas.An older generation formula(Hoffer Q) was included in the analysis. Mean refractive error(ME) was calculated one month postoperatively. The lens factors of all formulas were retrospectively optimized to set the ME to 0 for each formula across all eyes. The median absolute errors(MedAE)and the proportion of eyes achieving an absolute error(AE)within 0.5 diopters(D) were compared between the two formulas among MCS and ReLACS eyes, respectively.RESULTS: Of the 158 eyes studied, 64 eyes underwent MCS and 94 eyes underwent ReLACS. Among MCS eyes,the MedAE did not differ between the formulas(P=0.59),however among ReLACS eyes, Barrett and Hill-RBF were more accurate(P=0.001). Barrett and Hill-RBF were both more likely to yield AE<0.5 D among both groups(P<0.001).CONCLUSION: The Barrett and Hill-RBF formula lead to greater refractive accuracy and likelihood of refractive success when compare to Haigis in eyes undergoing Re LACS.