Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems——From Connection to Consilience

被引:4
|
作者
Xiao-Bing Hu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Peijun Shi [1 ,4 ,2 ]
Ming Wang [1 ,2 ]
Tao Ye [1 ,2 ]
Mark S.Leeson [3 ]
Sander E.van der Leeuw [1 ,5 ]
Jianguo Wu [1 ,6 ]
Ortwin Renn [7 ]
Carlo Jaeger [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University
[2] Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University
[3] School of Engineering, University of Warwick
[4] Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University
[5] ASU-SFI Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University
[6] School of Life Sciences and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Complex networks; Consilience degree; Co-evolution; Disaster risk reduction; Social-ecological systems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X2 [社会与环境];
学科分类号
083001 ;
摘要
The complexity of social-ecological systems(SES) is rooted in the outcomes of node activities connected by network topology. Thus far, in network dynamics research, the connectivity degree(CND), indicating how many nodes are connected to a given node, has been the dominant concept. However, connectivity focuses only on network topology, neglecting the crucial relation to node activities, and thereby leaving system outcomes largely unexplained. Inspired by the phenomenon of ‘‘consensus of wills and coordination of activities’ ’ often observed in disaster risk management, we propose a new concept of network characteristic, the consilience degree(CSD),aiming to measure the way in which network topology and node activities together contribute to system outcomes. The CSD captures the fact that nodes may assume different states that make their activities more or less compatible.Connecting two nodes with in/compatible states will lead to outcomes that are un/desirable from the perspective of the SES in question. We mathematically prove that the CSD is a generalized CND, and the CND is a special case of CSD. As a general, fundamental concept, the CSD can facilitate the development of a new framework of network properties, models, and theories that allows us to understand patterns of network behavior that cannot be explained in terms of connectivity alone. We further demonstrate that a co-evolutionary mechanism can naturally improve the CSD. Given the generality of co-evolution in SES, we argue that the CSD is an inherent attribute rather than an artificial concept, which underpins the fundamental importance of the CSD to the study of SES.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 356
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Understanding and Managing Freshwater Recreational Fisheries as Complex Adaptive Social-Ecological Systems
    Arlinghaus, R.
    Alos, J.
    Beardmore, B.
    Daedlow, K.
    Dorow, M.
    Fujitani, M.
    Huehn, D.
    Haider, W.
    Hunt, L. M.
    Johnson, B. M.
    Johnston, F.
    Klefoth, T.
    Matsumura, S.
    Monk, C.
    Pagel, T.
    Post, J. R.
    Rapp, T.
    Riepe, C.
    Ward, H.
    Wolter, C.
    [J]. REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE, 2017, 25 (01) : 1 - 41
  • [42] A better understanding of social-ecological systems is needed for adapting fisheries to climate change
    Salgueiro-Otero, Diego
    Ojea, Elena
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2020, 122
  • [43] A framework for understanding climate change impacts on coral reef social-ecological systems
    Cinner, Joshua Eli
    Pratchett, Morgan Stuart
    Graham, Nicholas Anthony James
    Messmer, Vanessa
    Fuentes, Mariana Menezes Prata Bezerra
    Ainsworth, Tracy
    Ban, Natalie
    Bay, Line Kolind
    Blythe, Jessica
    Dissard, Delphine
    Dunn, Simon
    Evans, Louisa
    Fabinyi, Michael
    Fidelman, Pedro
    Figueiredo, Joana
    Frisch, Ashley John
    Fulton, Christopher John
    Hicks, Christina Chemtai
    Lukoschek, Vimoksalehi
    Mallela, Jennie
    Moya, Aurelie
    Penin, Lucie
    Rummer, Jodie Lynn
    Walker, Stefan
    Williamson, David Hall
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (04) : 1133 - 1146
  • [44] Iterative scenarios for social-ecological systems
    Herrmann, Dustin L.
    Schwarz, Kirsten
    Allen, Craig R.
    Angeler, David G.
    Eason, Tarsha
    Garmestani, Ahjond
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (04):
  • [45] COVID-19: Understanding Novel Pathogens in Coupled Social-Ecological Systems
    Baker, Susan
    Bruford, Michael W.
    MacBride-Stewart, Sara
    Essam, Alice
    Nicol, Poppy
    Bellamy, Angelina Sanderson
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [46] Advancing the Understanding of Adaptive Capacity of Social-Ecological Systems to Absorb Climate Extremes
    Thonicke, Kirsten
    Bahn, Michael
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Bardgett, Richard D.
    Erb, Karlheinz
    Giamberini, Mariasilvia
    Reichstein, Markus
    Vollan, Bjoern
    Rammig, Anja
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [47] Adapting Institutions: Governance, Complexity and Social-Ecological Resilience
    Pacheco-Vega, Raul
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 13 (04) : 164 - 165
  • [48] Methods for understanding social-ecological systems: a review of place-based studies
    de Vos, Alta
    Biggs, Reinette
    Preiser, Rika
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 24 (04): : 1 - 24
  • [49] Mapping social-ecological systems archetypes
    Rocha, Juan
    Malmborg, Katja
    Gordon, Line
    Brauman, Kate
    DeClerck, Fabrice
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (03)
  • [50] Social-ecological resilience and geomorphic systems
    Chaffin, Brian C.
    Scown, Murray
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2018, 305 : 221 - 230