Nucleases in gene-editing technologies: past and prologue

被引:0
|
作者
Dan-Yuan Li [1 ,2 ]
Long-Qi Li [1 ,2 ]
Jun-Jie Gogo Liu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences,Tsinghua University
[2] Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q78 [基因工程(遗传工程)];
学科分类号
071007 ; 0836 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In recent decades, gene-editing technologies, typically based on deoxyribonucleases to specifically modify genomic sequences, have dramatically remodeled various aspects of life sciences, including fundamental research, breeding, and medical therapeutics. So far, four types of endonucleases have been adopted and optimized as gene-editing tools: meganuclease, ZFN, TALEN, and Cas nuclease from the CRISPR-Cas system. Each tool comes with its own advantages and limitations. Over the last ten years, RNA-guided Cas nucleases have been extensively investigated and successfully implemented in almost all mammalian cells due to their remarkable editing efficacy, high specificity, and flexibility in targeting the specific locus. Diverse Cas nuclease, together with meganuclease, ZFN, and TALEN, represent the key strategies for nuclease-based gene editing. However, systematic introductions and comparisons among four types of nucleases are not yet available. Here, we overview the capabilities of four types of nucleases along the development history of gene editing and describe the molecular mechanisms of substrate recognition and cleavage. Particularly, we summarize the promising CRISPR-Cas systems as well as modified tools applied for gene editing in the eukaryotic genome. Moreover, how the re-modulated nucleases and other nucleases, either naturally occurring or AI-designed, might manipulate DNA sequences is discussed and proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 56
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The first gene-editing treatment
    Regalado, Antonio
    MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 2024, 127 (01): : 24 - 24
  • [22] The Public and the Gene-Editing Revolution
    Blendon, Robert J.
    Gorski, Mary T.
    Benson, John M.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (15): : 1406 - 1411
  • [23] Gene-editing row escalates
    Cyranoski, David
    NATURE, 2016, 540 (7631) : 20 - +
  • [24] GENE EDITING A search-and-replace gene-editing tool
    Cross, Ryan
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2019, 97 (42) : 3 - 3
  • [25] Gene-Editing Technologies Paired With Viral Vectors for Translational Research Into Neurodegenerative Diseases
    Rittiner, Joseph Edward
    Moncalvo, Malik
    Chiba-Falek, Ornit
    Kantor, Boris
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 13
  • [27] Urgency to rein in the gene-editing technology
    Xiaoxue Zhang
    Protein & Cell, 2015, 6 (05) : 313
  • [28] Engage public in gene-editing policy
    Filippa Lentzos
    Nature, 2015, 521 : 289 - 289
  • [29] Engage public in gene-editing policy
    Lentzos, Filippa
    NATURE, 2015, 521 (7552) : 289 - 289
  • [30] Gene-editing tool shows promise
    Guterman, Lila
    SCIENCE, 2018, 361 (6407) : 1053 - 1053