Impact of immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal in long-term hepatitis C virus liver transplant recipients

被引:0
|
作者
Tommaso Maria Manzia [1 ]
Roberta Angelico [1 ]
Paolo Ciano [1 ]
Jon Mugweru [2 ]
Kofi Owusu [2 ]
Daniele Sforza [1 ]
Luca Toti [1 ]
Giuseppe Tisone [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery,Section of Transplantation,Tor Vergata University of Rome,00133 Rome,Italy
[2] Wake Forest School of Medicine,Winston-Salem,NC 27106,United States
关键词
Liver transplantation; Hepatitis C virus recurrence; Immunosuppression withdrawal; Micofenolate mofetil; Clinical operational tolerance; Minimization of immunosuppression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.3 [肝及肝管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
AIM:To investigate the effects of different immunosuppressive regimens and avoidance on fibrosis progression in hepatitis C virus(HCV)liver transplant(LT)recipients.METHODS:We retrospectively compared the liver biopsies of well-matched HCV LT recipients under calcineurin inhibitors(CNI group,n=21)and mycophenolate(MMF group,n=15)monotherapy,with those patients who successfully withdrawn immunosuppression(IS)therapy from at least 3 years(TOL group,n=10).To perform the well-matched analysis,all HCV transplanted patients from December 1993 were screened.Only those HCV patients who reached the following criteria were considered for the analysis:(1)at least3 years of post-operative follow-up;(2)patients with normal liver graft function under low dose CNI monotherapy(CNI group);(3)patients with normal liver graft function under antimetabolite(Micophenolate Mofetil or coated mycophenolate sodium)monotherapy(MMF group);and(4)recipients with normal liver function without any IS.We excluded from the analysis recipients who were IS free or under monotherapy for<36 mo,recipients with cirrhosis or with unstable liver function tests.RESULTS:Thirty six recipients were enrolled in the study.Demographics,clinical data,time after LT and baseline liver biopsies were comparable in the three groups.After six years of follow-up,there was no worsening of hepatic fibrosis in the MMF group(2.5±1.5Ishak Units vs 2.9±1.7 Ishak Units,P=0.5)and TOL group(2.7±10.7 vs 2.5±1.2,P=0.2).In contrast,a significant increase in the fibrosis score was observed in the CNI group(2.2±1.7 vs 3.9±1.6,P=0.008).The yearly fibrosis progression rate was significantly worse in the CNI group(0.32±0.35)vs MMF group(0.03±0.31,P=0.03),and TOL group(-0.02±0.27,P=0.02).No differences have been reported in grading scores for CNI group(2.79±1.9,P=0.7),MMF group(3.2±1.5,P=0.9)and TOL group(3.1±1.4,P=0.2).Twenty four patients were treated with low dose ribavirin(8TOL,7 MMF,9 CNI).The hepatitis C titers were comparable in the three groups.No episodes of rejection have been reported despite differences of liver function test in the three groups during the observational period.CONCLUSION:IS withdrawal and MMF monotherapy is safe and seems to be associated with the slowest fibrosis progression in HCV LT recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:12217 / 12225
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prevalence of subclinical histological lesions and tolerance biomarkers in long-term adult liver transplant recipients considered for immunosuppression withdrawal
    Sanchez-Fueyo, A.
    Douiri, A.
    Elstad, M.
    Kodela, E.
    Wall, J.
    Riani, E. B.
    Alexander, G.
    Marshall, A.
    Navasa, M.
    Ferguson, J.
    Simpson, K. J.
    Pascher, A.
    Jaeckel, E.
    Tachtatzis, P.
    Nevens, F.
    Masson, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 : S27 - S27
  • [22] Development of Post-Transplant DSA Following Immunosuppression Minimization/Withdrawal in Liver Transplant Recipients.
    Jucaud, V.
    Shaked, A.
    DesMarais, M.
    Sayre, P.
    Everly, M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 : 472 - 473
  • [23] Long-term histological effects of preemptive antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
    Kuo, Alexander
    Lan, Billy
    Feng, Sandy
    Terrault, Norah A.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 44 (04) : 189A - 189A
  • [24] Hepatitis C recurrence (HCVR) in liver transplant recipients (OLT) under mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppression (IS): A long-term follow up
    Fasola, CG
    Netto, GJ
    Sanchez, EQ
    Chinnakotla, S
    Levy, MF
    Goldstein, RM
    Klintmalm, GB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 356 - 356
  • [25] Operational tolerance: Long term observations after complete withdrawal of immunosuppression (ISP) in liver transplant recipients
    Tzakis, Andreas
    Tryphonopoulos, Panagiotis
    Weppler, Debbie
    Morales, Rolando Garcia
    Cirocco, Robert
    Somaraz, Amutha
    Posner, Ronnie
    Takahashi, Hidenori
    Berlanga, Alfredys
    Levi, David
    Nishida, Seigo
    Kato, Tomoaki
    Selvaggi, Gennaro
    Moon, Jang
    Island, Eddie
    Ruiz, Phillip
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 : 542 - 542
  • [26] Virological response for recurrent hepatitis C improves long-term survival in liver transplant recipients
    Tanaka, Tomohiro
    Selzner, Nazia
    Therapondos, George
    Renner, Eberhard L.
    Lilly, Leslie B.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [27] Steroid minimization in liver transplant recipients: impact on hepatitis C recurrence and post-transplant diabetes
    Humar, Abhinav
    Crotteau, Shaina
    Gruessner, Angelika
    Kandaswamy, Raja
    Gruessner, Rainer
    Payne, William
    Lake, John
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 21 (04) : 526 - 531
  • [28] Effect of long-term tacrolimus immunosuppression on renal function in liver transplant recipients.
    Corman, SL
    Coley, KC
    Schonder, KE
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2005, 25 (03): : 475 - 475
  • [29] LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF HEART TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH HEPATITIS C INFECTION
    Stepanova, M.
    De Avila, L.
    Jeffers, T.
    Wong, R.
    Ahmed, A.
    Younossi, Z. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 64 : S554 - S554
  • [30] Withdrawal of immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients: Is this as good as it gets?
    McCaughan, GW
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (04) : 408 - 410