实际知识产权保护、模仿创新与自主创新

被引：30

作者：

代中强 ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] 集美大学财经学院

来源：

经济评论 | 2010年 / 06期

关键词：

知识产权; 模仿创新; 自主创新; 研发; 锁定;

D O I：

10.19361/j.er.2010.06.011

中图分类号：

F204 [科学技术管理];

学科分类号：

020201 ;

摘要：

现有文献和统计资料无法有效区分我国研发支出是模仿创新导向还是自主创新导向。本文通过测算省际实际知识产权保护水平,利用中国省际动态面板数据研究表明,近年来我国研发支出主要为模仿创新导向。实证研究还发现,实际知识产权保护的提高将显著降低我国研发支出总量及研发支出占国内生产总值的比重,教育水平的提高对我国研发支出的影响在统计上并不显著;同时,外商直接投资存量的增加将显著提高我国研发支出。同时,我们还惊奇地发现,在大国市场效应作用下,随着我国对外开放程度的加深以及外商直接投资存量的增加,我国研发将可能被锁定在模仿创新模式上。据此,我国要突破模仿创新模式锁定,最终实现模仿创新向自主创新的跨越,须在加强实际知识产权保护的同时着力于知识产权反垄断的制度建设。

引用

页码：85 / 97

页数：13

共 22 条

[11] Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries
Chen, Y
Puttitanun, T
[J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 78 (02) : 474 - 493
[12] International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries[J] . Patricia Higino Schneider.Journal of Development Economics . 2005 (2)
[13] ON TECHNOLOGY LICENSING IN A STACKELBERG DUOPOLY[J] . X.HENRY WANG,BILL Z.YANG.Australian Economic Papers . 2004 (4)
[14] Learning from exporting revisited in a less developed setting
Blalock, G
Gertler, PJ
[J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2004, 75 (02) : 397 - 416
[15] The determinants of national innovative capacity
Furman, JL
Porter, ME
Stern, S
[J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (06) : 899 - 933
[16] The impact of patent protection, economy openness and national culture on R&D investment: a cross-country empirical investigation[J] . Nikos C. Varsakelis.Research Policy . 2001 (7)
[17] Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product-cycle model[J] . Guifang Yang,Keith E. Maskus.Journal of International Economics . 2001 (1)
[18] Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study[J] . Juan C. Ginarte,Walter G. Park.Research Policy . 1997 (3)
[19] ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS
ARELLANO, M
BOVER, O
[J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) : 29 - 51
[20] ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE
ROMER, PM
[J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (05) : S71 - S102

← 1 2 3 →