Comparison of geochemical parameters derived from comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry and conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

被引:0
|
作者
WANG HuiTong1
2 Key Laboratory of Petroleum Geochemistry of PetroChina
3 State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery
机构
关键词
comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography; time-of-flight mass spectrometry; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; geochemical parameters;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P618.13 [石油、天然气];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The saturated and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions of crude oil samples have been analyzed by using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) and conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In order to investigate the consistency and discrepancy of the obtained data from the two instruments, some petroleum geochemical parameters have been compared. A comparison of 23 geochemical parameters indicates that 10 parameters are comparable from the two instruments with less than 5% deviations. Therefore, GC×GC-TOFMS is equivalent to conventional GC-MS in some geochemical parameter acquisitions. However, the other 13 parameters are discrepant, including gammacerane / αβ-hopane, Ts/Tm, 2-ethyl-naphthalene / 1-ethyl-naphthalene (ENR), (2, 6-dimethyl-naphthalene +2,7-dimethyl-naphthalene) / 1,5-dimethyl-naphthalene (DNR), etc. Furthermore, compared to GC× GC-TOFMS, some low concentration compounds could not be detected by the conventional GC-MS, which results in the missing of related geochemical data. Normally, this is caused by the limited separation power and peak capacity of the conventional GC column. Besides, the co-eluting peak integrations are also affected significantly due to the incomplete separation of the compounds. Some low concentration compounds might not be detected because of the interference from the baseline noise or from other substances. GC×GC-TOFMS prevails in compound separation against the conventional GC-MS by avoiding co-elution, which achieves more accurate and precise peak area measurement with the presence of a true baseline. So petroleum geochemical parameters obtained from the GC×GC-TOFMS are more reliable than those from the conventional GC-MS. GC×GC-TOFMS may become one of the most effective analytical tools for the oil and gas geochemical study.
引用
收藏
页码:1892 / 1901
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of geochemical parameters derived from comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry and conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
    Wang HuiTong
    Weng Na
    Zhang ShuiChang
    Zhu GuangYou
    Wei CaiYun
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2011, 54 (12) : 1892 - 1901
  • [2] Comparison of geochemical parameters derived from comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry and conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
    HuiTong Wang
    Na Weng
    ShuiChang Zhang
    GuangYou Zhu
    CaiYun Wei
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2011, 54 : 1892 - 1901
  • [3] Comparison of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the analysis of tobacco essential oils
    Zhu, SK
    Lu, X
    Xing, J
    Zhang, SW
    Kong, HW
    Xu, GW
    Wu, CY
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 545 (02) : 224 - 231
  • [4] Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
    Willson, Joseph
    NATURE REVIEWS METHODS PRIMERS, 2025, 5 (01):
  • [5] Comparison of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the qualitative characterisation of roasted barley by solid-phase microextraction
    Bianchi, Federica
    Careri, Maria
    Conti, Chiara
    Musci, Marilena
    Vreuls, Rene
    JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2007, 30 (04) : 527 - 533
  • [6] Chemometrics comparison of gas chromatography with mass spectrometry and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry Daphnia magna metabolic profiles exposed to salinity
    Parastar, Hadi
    Garreta-Lara, Elba
    Campos, Bruno
    Barata, Carlos
    Lacorte, Silvia
    Tauler, Roma
    JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2018, 41 (11) : 2368 - 2379
  • [7] Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: A review
    Mondello, Luigi
    Tranchida, Peter Quinto
    Dugo, Paola
    Dugo, Giovanni
    MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS, 2008, 27 (02) : 101 - 124
  • [8] Class comparison enabled mass spectrum purification for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry
    Ochoa, Grant S.
    Sudol, Paige E.
    Trinklein, Timothy J.
    Synovec, Robert E.
    TALANTA, 2022, 236
  • [9] Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry peak sorting algorithm
    Oh, Cheolhwan
    Huang, Xiaodong
    Regnier, Fred E.
    Buck, Charles
    Zhang, Xiang
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2008, 1179 (02) : 205 - 215
  • [10] Data Analysis Tool for Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
    Castillo, Sandra
    Mattila, Ismo
    Miettinen, Jarkko
    Oresic, Matej
    Hyotylainen, Tuulia
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 83 (08) : 3058 - 3067