Comparison of cosmological models using standard rulers and candles

被引:0
|
作者
Xiao-Lei Li [1 ]
Shuo Cao [1 ]
Xiao-Gang Zheng [1 ]
Song Li [2 ]
Marek Biesiada [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University
[2] Department of Physics, Capital Normal University
[3] Department of Astrophysics and Cosmology, Institute of Physics, University of Silesia
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;
关键词
(cosmology:) dark energy; cosmology:observations; (cosmology:) cosmological parameters;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P159 [宇宙学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we used standard rulers and standard candles(separately and jointly) to explore five popular dark energy models under the assumption of the spatial flatness of the Universe. As standard rulers, we used a data set comprised of 118 galactic scale strong lensing systems(individual standard rulers if properly calibrated for the mass density profile) combined with BAO diagnostics(statistical standard ruler). Type Ia supernovae served as standard candles. Unlike most previous statistical studies involving strong lensing systems, we relaxed the assumption of a singular isothermal sphere(SIS) in favor of its generalization: the power-law mass density profile. Therefore, along with cosmological model parameters,we fitted the power law index and its first derivative with respect to the redshift(thus allowing for mass density profile evolution). It turned out that the best fitted γ parameters are in agreement with each other,irrespective of the cosmological model considered. This demonstrates that galactic strong lensing systems may provide a complementary probe to test the properties of dark energy. The fits for cosmological model parameters which we obtained are in agreement with alternative studies performed by other researchers.Because standard rulers and standard candles have different parameter degeneracies, a combination of standard rulers and standard candles gives much more restrictive results for cosmological parameters. Finally,we attempted an analysis based on model selection using information theoretic criteria(AIC and BIC). Our results support the claim that the cosmological constant model is still best and there is no(at least statistical)reason to prefer any other more complex model.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 136
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Standard Candles
    Kemick, Richard Kelly
    FIDDLEHEAD, 2016, (267): : 113 - 115
  • [22] Comparison of cosmological models using Bayesian theory
    John, MV
    Narlikar, JV
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2002, 65 (04):
  • [23] Thunder and Lightning: Using Neutron-star Mergers as Simultaneous Standard Candles and Sirens to Measure Cosmological Parameters
    Doctor, Zoheyr
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2020, 892 (01)
  • [24] Accurate weak lensing of standard candles. I. Flexible cosmological fits
    Marra, Valerio
    Quartin, Miguel
    Amendola, Luca
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2013, 88 (06):
  • [25] A new test of f(R) gravity with the cosmological standard rulers in radio quasars
    Xu, Tengpeng
    Cao, Shuo
    Qi, Jingzhao
    Biesiada, Marek
    Zheng, Xiaogang
    Zhu, Zong-Hong
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2018, (06):
  • [26] Discerning dark energy models with high redshift standard candles
    Andersen, P.
    Hjorth, J.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 472 (02) : 1413 - 1420
  • [27] The possible impact of gamma-ray burst detector thresholds on cosmological standard candles
    Shahmoradi, A.
    Nemiroff, R. J.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 411 (03) : 1843 - 1856
  • [28] Cepheid standard candles
    Tanvir, NR
    HARMONIZING COSMIC DISTANCE SCALES IN A POST-HIPPARCOS ERA, 1999, 167 : 84 - 100
  • [29] Comparison of cosmological models using recent supernova data
    Nesseris, S
    Perivolaropoulos, L
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2004, 70 (04):
  • [30] A COMPARISON OF COSMOLOGICAL MODELS USING TIME DELAY LENSES
    Wei, Jun-Jie
    Wu, Xue-Feng
    Melia, Fulvio
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 788 (02):