The impact of farmers' assessments of risk management strategies on their adoption willingness

被引:0
|
作者
SHANG Yan [1 ]
XIONG Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F323.6 [农业劳动力与农业人口]; F842.66 [];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020204 ; 020205 ; 1203 ; 120404 ;
摘要
Farmers’ assessments of risk management strategies and how the assessments influence their willingness to adopt these strategies are poorly understood. This study conducts a structured survey of 469 farmers to investigate how farmers assess both crop insurance and crop price insurance, the impact of the assessments on their adoption willingness, and in particular, the differences in assessments and adoption willingness between crop insurance and crop price insurance. Empirical results show that farmers’ assessments on crop insurance can be significantly improved through communication and experience. The most effective way to improve farmers’ assessments on crop price insurance is providing adequate information about the insurance products. Furthermore, farmers’ adoption willingness would be enhanced by improved assessment of both crop yield and crop price insurance. This study provides the first empirical evidence that farmers have limited information to assess insurance, which significantly influences their willingness to adopt. This finding reflects that the dissemination of insurance policies, the effectiveness of insurance,and the availability of insurance services significantly enable farmers’ ability to assess risk management strategies, which potentially increases farmers’ willingness to adopt insurance.
引用
收藏
页码:3323 / 3338
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Farmers' willingness to participate in best management practices in Kentucky
    Zhong, Hua
    Qing, Ping
    Hu, Wuyang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 59 (06) : 1015 - 1039
  • [32] AGROFORESTRY ADOPTION AND RISK PERCEPTION BY FARMERS IN SENEGAL
    CAVENESS, FA
    KURTZ, WB
    [J]. AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 1993, 21 (01) : 11 - 25
  • [33] Farmers' adoption of digital technology and agricultural entrepreneurial willingness: Evidence from China
    Li, Fanghua
    Zang, Dungang
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    Yang, Dongmei
    Jiang, Yuansheng
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2023, 73
  • [34] Cattle farmers' perceptions of risk and risk management strategies: evidence from Northern Ethiopia
    Bishu, Kinfe G.
    O'Reilly, Seamus
    Lahiff, Edward
    Steiner, Bodo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2018, 21 (05) : 579 - 598
  • [35] Farmers' motivations, risk perceptions and risk management strategies in a developing economy: Bangladesh experience
    Ahsan, Dewan Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2011, 14 (03) : 325 - 349
  • [36] Improving environmental risk management through historical impact assessments
    Amsted Industries Incorporated, Chicago, IL, United States
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    [J]. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 2006, 6 (816-823):
  • [37] Improving environmental risk management through historical impact assessments
    Rogers, Daniel T.
    Kaufman, Martin M.
    Murray, Kent S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2006, 56 (06) : 816 - 823
  • [38] The Impact of Kinship Networks on the Adoption of Risk-Mitigating Strategies in Ethiopia
    Di Falco, Salvatore
    Bulte, Erwin
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 43 : 100 - 110
  • [39] Strategies for the management and adoption of impact capture processes within research information management systems
    Fedorciow, Laura
    Bayley, Julie
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT RESEARCH INFORMATION SYSTEMS (CRIS 2014): MANAGING DATA INTENSIVE SCIENCE: THE ROLE OF RESEARCH INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN REALISING THE DIGITAL AGENDA, 2014, 33 : 25 - 32
  • [40] Farmers' assessment of plant biosecurity risk management strategies and influencing factors: A study of smallholder farmers in Australia
    Thi Tam Duong
    Brewer, Tom D.
    Luck, Jo
    Zander, Kerstin K.
    [J]. OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2019, 48 (01) : 48 - 57