Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Endoleaks with Failed Computed Tomography Angiography Diagnosis after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:2
|
作者
Yang Xiao
Chen Yue-Xin
Zhang Bo
Jiang Yu-Xin
Liu Chang-Wei
Zhao Rui-Na
Wu Qiong
Zhang Da-Ming
机构
[1] Peking Union Medical College Hospital
[2] China
[3] Department of Ultrasound
[4] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
[5] Department of Radiology
[6] Department of Vascular Surgery
[7] Beijing 100730
关键词
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm; Color Doppler Flow Imaging; Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound; Endoleak; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R445.1 [超声波诊断]; R543.16 [];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ; 100207 ;
摘要
Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is one of the first-line therapies of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Postoperative endoleak is the most common complication of EVAR. Computed tomography angiography (CTA), which is routine for follow-up, has side effects (e.g., radiation) and also has a certain percentage of missed diagnosis. Preliminary studies on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) have shown that the sensitivity of CEUS for detecting endoleak is no lower than that of CTA. To investigate the advantages of CEUS, we conducted CEUS examinations of post-EVAR cases in which CTA failed to detect endoleak or could not verify the type of endoleak.Methods: Post-EVAR patients, who were clinically considered to have endoleak and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled between March 2013 and November 2014. All of the patients underwent color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and a CEUS examination. Size, location, microbubble dispersion, and hemodynamic characteristics of leaks were recorded. Comparison between the diagnosis of CEUS and CDFI was conducted using Fisher’s exact test and clinical outcomes of all patients were followed up.Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled, and 12 (75%) had endoleaks with verified types by CEUS. Among 12 cases of endoleaks were positive by CEUS, 10 were CDFI-positive, and the four CEUS-negative cases were all negative by CDFI. The diagnostic values of CEUS and CDFI were statistically different (P = 0.008). Six patients with high-pressure endoleaks received endovascular re-intervention guided by CEUS results. One patient with type III endoleak had open surgery when endovascular repair failed.Conclusions: CEUS is a new, safe, and effective means for detection of endoleaks post-EVAR. This technique can be used as a supplement for routine CTA follow-up to provide more detailed information on endoleak and its category.
引用
收藏
页码:2491 / 2497
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endoleak after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A case report and review of the literature
    Lei, Yangyang
    Tong, Wenjuan
    Cheng, Meiqing
    Wu, Shaohong
    Chen, Zuanan
    Xie, Xiaoyan
    Zheng, Yanling
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (16) : C196 - C196
  • [32] Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Mostafa, Karim
    Pfarr, Julian
    Langguth, Patrick
    Schaefer, Jost Philipp
    Trentmann, Jens
    Koktzoglou, Ioannis
    Edelman, Robert R.
    Bueno Neves, Fernando
    Graessner, Joachim
    Both, Marcus
    Jansen, Olav
    Ravesh, Mona Salehi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)
  • [33] Letter to the Editor: “Unenhanced computed tomography radiomics help detect endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm”
    James Budge
    Keith Farrell-Dillon
    Bilal Azhar
    Iain Roy
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 (8) : 4850 - 4851
  • [34] Accuracy and Utility of Intraoperative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound After Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Scott, Carla K.
    Colon, Jesus Porras
    Gonzalez, Marilisa Soto
    Pavarino, Felipe L.
    Baig, Mirza S.
    Kirkwood, Melissa L.
    Timaran, Carlos H.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (01) : E21 - E22
  • [35] Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    McWilliams, RG
    Martin, J
    White, D
    Gould, DA
    Harris, PL
    Fear, SC
    Brennan, J
    Gilling-Smith, GL
    Bakran, A
    Rowlands, PC
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (08) : 1107 - 1114
  • [36] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and/or colour duplex ultrasound for surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and economic evaluation
    Brazzelli, Miriam
    Hernandez, Rodolfo
    Sharma, Pawana
    Robertson, Clare
    Shimonovich, Michal
    MacLennan, Graeme
    Fraser, Cynthia
    Jamieson, Russell
    Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 22 (72) : 1 - +
  • [37] Magnetic Resonance Imaging is More Sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Endoleaks after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review
    Habets, J.
    Zandvoort, H. J. A.
    Reitsma, J. B.
    Bartels, L. W.
    Moll, F. L.
    Leiner, T.
    van Herwaarden, J. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 45 (04) : 340 - 350
  • [38] A systematic review and meta-analysis of Duplex ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound or computed tomography for surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Karthikesalingam, A.
    Al-Jundi, W.
    Jackson, D.
    Boyle, J. R.
    Beard, J. D.
    Holt, P. J. E.
    Thompson, M. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 2 - 3
  • [39] Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of CEUS
    R. Iezzi
    A. R. Cotroneo
    R. Basilico
    A. Simeone
    M. L. Storto
    L. Bonomo
    Abdominal Imaging, 2010, 35 : 106 - 114
  • [40] Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of CEUS
    Iezzi, R.
    Cotroneo, A. R.
    Basilico, R.
    Simeone, A.
    Storto, M. L.
    Bonomo, L.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (01): : 106 - 114