Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Endoleaks with Failed Computed Tomography Angiography Diagnosis after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:2
|
作者
Yang Xiao
Chen Yue-Xin
Zhang Bo
Jiang Yu-Xin
Liu Chang-Wei
Zhao Rui-Na
Wu Qiong
Zhang Da-Ming
机构
[1] Peking Union Medical College Hospital
[2] China
[3] Department of Ultrasound
[4] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
[5] Department of Radiology
[6] Department of Vascular Surgery
[7] Beijing 100730
关键词
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm; Color Doppler Flow Imaging; Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound; Endoleak; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R445.1 [超声波诊断]; R543.16 [];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ; 100207 ;
摘要
Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is one of the first-line therapies of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Postoperative endoleak is the most common complication of EVAR. Computed tomography angiography (CTA), which is routine for follow-up, has side effects (e.g., radiation) and also has a certain percentage of missed diagnosis. Preliminary studies on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) have shown that the sensitivity of CEUS for detecting endoleak is no lower than that of CTA. To investigate the advantages of CEUS, we conducted CEUS examinations of post-EVAR cases in which CTA failed to detect endoleak or could not verify the type of endoleak.Methods: Post-EVAR patients, who were clinically considered to have endoleak and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled between March 2013 and November 2014. All of the patients underwent color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and a CEUS examination. Size, location, microbubble dispersion, and hemodynamic characteristics of leaks were recorded. Comparison between the diagnosis of CEUS and CDFI was conducted using Fisher’s exact test and clinical outcomes of all patients were followed up.Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled, and 12 (75%) had endoleaks with verified types by CEUS. Among 12 cases of endoleaks were positive by CEUS, 10 were CDFI-positive, and the four CEUS-negative cases were all negative by CDFI. The diagnostic values of CEUS and CDFI were statistically different (P = 0.008). Six patients with high-pressure endoleaks received endovascular re-intervention guided by CEUS results. One patient with type III endoleak had open surgery when endovascular repair failed.Conclusions: CEUS is a new, safe, and effective means for detection of endoleaks post-EVAR. This technique can be used as a supplement for routine CTA follow-up to provide more detailed information on endoleak and its category.
引用
收藏
页码:2491 / 2497
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Endoleaks with Failed Computed Tomography Angiography Diagnosis after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Yang, Xiao
    Chen, Yue-Xin
    Zhang, Bo
    Jiang, Yu-Xin
    Liu, Chang-Wei
    Zhao, Rui-Na
    Wu, Qiong
    Zhang, Da-Ming
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (18) : 2491 - 2497
  • [2] Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound for early diagnosis of endoleaks during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Massoni, Claudio Bianchini
    Perini, Paolo
    Fanelli, Mara
    Ucci, Alessandro
    Rossi, Giulia
    Azzarone, Matteo
    Tecchio, Tiziano
    Freyrie, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (06) : 1844 - 1850
  • [3] Intraoperative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Endoleaks During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Massoni, Claudio Bianchini
    Perini, Paolo
    Ucci, Alessandro
    Rossi, Giulia
    Fanelli, Mara
    Azzarone, Matteo
    Tecchio, Tiziano
    Freyrie, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (06) : E91 - E91
  • [4] Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound versus Computed Tomographic Angiography for Surveillance of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Ten Bosch, Jan A.
    Rouwet, Ellen V.
    Peters, Cecile T. H.
    Jansen, Linda
    Verhagen, Hence J. M.
    Prins, Martin H.
    Teijink, Joep A. W.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (05) : 638 - 643
  • [5] Contrast-enhanced US Evaluation of Endoleaks after Endovascular Stent Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Alexander, Lauren F.
    Overfield, Cameron J.
    Sella, David M.
    Clingan, M. Jennings
    Erben, Young M.
    Metcalfe, Allie M.
    Robbin, Michelle L.
    Caserta, Melanie P.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2022, 42 (06) : 1758 - 1775
  • [6] Non-contrast Computed Tomography is Comparable to Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography for Aortic Volume Analysis after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Nambi, P.
    Sengupta, R.
    Krajcer, Z.
    Muthupillai, R.
    Strickman, N.
    Cheong, B. Y. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (04) : 460 - 466
  • [7] Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound can Replace Computed Tomography Angiography for Surveillance After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Bredahl, K. K.
    Taudorf, M.
    Lonn, L.
    Vogt, K. C.
    Sillesen, H.
    Eiberg, J. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 52 (06) : 729 - 734
  • [8] Evaluating the feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detecting after preemptive coiling endoleaks in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: A pilot study
    Panagrosso, Marco
    Ghulam, Qasam
    Duvnjak, Stevo
    Resch, Timothy
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY CASES INNOVATIONS AND TECHNIQUES, 2024, 10 (05):
  • [9] A comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and multislice computed tomography in detecting and classifying endoleaks in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Guertler, Verena M.
    Sommer, Wieland H.
    Meimarakis, Georgios
    Kopp, Reinhard
    Weidenhagen, Rolf
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 58 (02) : 340 - 345
  • [10] Feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Wang, Yang
    Zhang, Yuewei
    Li, Mengpu
    Liu, Zhiwen
    Ren, Junhong
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (09) : 6556 - 6565