Comparison of Efficacy of Two Vitrification Solutions for Mouse Morulae

被引:0
|
作者
Fu-fu ZHENG1
机构
关键词
vitrification; embryo cryopreservation; mouse morulae;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R691 [一般疾病];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective To study the efficacy of two vitrification solutions for mouse morulae Methods Good morulaes of NIH mice were collected and used to test toxicity of the vitri- fication solutions EDS40 (40% ethylene glycol,18% dextran and 0.5 mol sucrose) and EFS40 (40% ethylene glycol,18% ficoll and 0.5 mol sucrose). Fine vitrified morulae were packaged in 0.25 mL plastic straws and immersed into liquid nitrogen and cryopreserved for about 2-3 months. Then the straws were heated rapidly, washed in Ham’s F12 medium and cultured. The viability was determined by morphology and blastocyst formation after being cultured for 48 h. Some embryos were transplanted to recipients after being cul- tured for 12-14 h. The number of pregnant recipients and young born was counted and analyzed by Chi-squared test. Results The toxicity of EDS40 solution was significantly lower than that of EFS40 (P<0.05) and the number of embryos developed to the blastocysts after vitrification in EDS40 was significantly higher than in EFS40 (P<0.05). The number of zona pellucida and the number of pregnancy and birth integrated after vitrification cryopreservation had no significant difference between EDS40 and EFS40 (P>0.05). However, the embryo fine- ness rates after vitrification in EDS40 was significantly better than in EFS40 (P<0.01). Conclusion EDS40 solution has less toxicity and better cryoprotect effect on embryos than EFS 40.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] VITRIFICATION OF MOUSE ISLETS OF LANGERHANS - COMPARISON WITH A MORE CONVENTIONAL FREEZING METHOD
    JUTTE, NHPM
    HEYSE, P
    JANSEN, HG
    BRUINING, GJ
    ZEILMAKER, GH
    CRYOBIOLOGY, 1987, 24 (04) : 292 - 302
  • [32] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT VITRIFICATION/WARMING TECHNIQUES USING MOUSE BLASTOCYSTS.
    Behr, B.
    Gebhardt, J.
    Watt, J.
    Zhao, Q.
    Reddy, V.
    Dasig, J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S116 - S116
  • [33] Comparison and Efficacy of Two Endodontic Paper Brands to Measure Mouse Tear Production
    Arnold, Juliette
    Bacellar-Galdino, Marianna
    Brown, Austin
    Pappenhagen, Nate
    Jamison, Jeff
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [34] Comparing SSV and OPS vitrification techniques and different solutions on cryopreservation of mouse blastocysts
    Akkoc, Tolga
    Taskin, Ali Cihan
    Caputcu, Arzu Tas
    Arat, Sezen
    Bagis, Haydar
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 22 : S52 - S52
  • [35] CRYOPRESERVATION OF EXPANDED MOUSE BLASTOCYSTS BY VITRIFICATION IN ETHYLENE GLYCOL-BASED SOLUTIONS
    ZHU, SE
    KASAI, M
    OTOGE, H
    SAKURAI, T
    MACHIDA, T
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND FERTILITY, 1993, 98 (01): : 139 - 145
  • [36] DEVELOPMENTAL CAPACITY OF MECHANICALLY BISECTED MOUSE MORULAE AND BLASTOCYSTS
    WANG, ZJ
    TROUNSON, A
    DZIADEK, M
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 1990, 2 (06) : 683 - 691
  • [37] Vitrification of boer goat morulae and early blastocysts by straw and open-pulled straw method
    Hong, Q-H
    Tian, S-J
    Zhu, S-E
    Feng, J-Z
    Yan, C-L
    Zhao, X-M
    Liu, G-S
    Zheng, S-M
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2007, 42 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [38] Comparison of two combinations of cryoprotectants for the vitrification of immature porcine oocytes
    Nohalez, A.
    Gomis, J.
    Martinez, C. A.
    Gil, M. A.
    Angel, M. A.
    Alminana, C.
    Roca, J.
    Martinez, E. A.
    Cuello, C.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2014, 49 : 124 - 124
  • [39] Comparison of two different cryoprotectant formulations for oocyte vitrification.
    Desai, N.
    Julia, S.
    Abdel-Hafez, F.
    Goldfarb, J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S338 - S338
  • [40] Comparison of two vitrification protocol of human blastocysts using Cryoloop
    Numata, M.
    Kyono, K.
    Fukunaga, N.
    Yagi, A.
    Nakajo, Y.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 141 - 141