Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer:current status and perspectives

被引:2
|
作者
Roberto Biffi [1 ]
Fabrizio Luca [1 ]
Paolo Pietro Bianchi [1 ]
Sabina Cenciarelli [1 ]
Wanda Petz [1 ]
Igor Monsellato [1 ]
Manuela Valvo [1 ]
Maria Laura Cossu [1 ]
Tiago Leal Ghezzi [1 ]
Kassem Shmaissany [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European Institute of Oncology
关键词
Rectal cancer; Robotic total mesorectal excision; Robotic surgery; Robotic resection; Circumferential resection margin; Lymph node yield; Distal resection margin positivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.37 []; TP242 [机器人];
学科分类号
100214 ; 1111 ;
摘要
The laparoscopic approach for treatment of rectal cancer has been proven feasible and oncologically safe, and is able to offer better short-term outcomes than traditional open procedures, mainly in terms of reduced length of hospital stay and time to return to working activity. In spite of this, the laparoscopic technique is usually practised only in high-volume experienced centres, mainly because it requires a prolonged and demanding learning curve. It has been estimated that over 50 operations are required for an experienced colorectal surgeon to achieve proficiency with this technique. Robotic surgery enables the surgeon to perform minimally invasive operations with better vision and more intuitive and precise control of the operating instruments, thus promising to overcome some of the technical difficulties associated with standard laparoscopy. It has high-definition threedimensional vision, it translates the surgeon’s hand movements into precise movements of the instruments inside the patient, the camera is held and moved by the first surgeon, and a fourth robotic arm is available as a fixed retractor. The aim of this review is to summarise the current data on clinical and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in rectal cancer, focusing on short- and long-term results, and providing original data from the authors’ centre.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:546 / 556
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current Status of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Urology
    Song, Sang Hoon
    Kim, Kun Suk
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 55 (08) : 499 - 504
  • [22] Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
    Khajeh, Elias
    Aminizadeh, Ehsan
    Moghadam, Arash Dooghaie
    Nikbakhsh, Rajan
    Goncalves, Gil
    Carvalho, Carlos
    Parvaiz, Amjad
    Kulu, Yakup
    Mehrabi, Arianeb
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [23] Robot-assisted surgery for lung cancer: State of the art and perspectives
    Veronesi, Giulia
    Novellis, Pierluigi
    Voulaz, Emanuele
    Alloisio, Marco
    LUNG CANCER, 2016, 101 : 28 - 34
  • [24] Robot-assisted rectal surgery: hype or progress?
    Becker, T.
    Egberts, J. E.
    Schafmayer, C.
    Aselmann, H.
    CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (07): : 567 - 572
  • [25] The current status of robot-assisted cystectomy
    Tyritzis, Stavros Ioannis
    Collins, Justin W.
    Wiklund, Nils Peter
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 34 (02) : 101 - 109
  • [26] Robot-Assisted Surgery: Current Status Evaluation in Abdominal and Urological Pediatric Surgery
    Chaussy, Yann
    Becmeur, Francois
    Lardy, Hubert
    Aubert, Didier
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (06): : 530 - 538
  • [27] Robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: where do we stand?
    Allaix, Marco E.
    Fichera, Alessandro
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2018, 3
  • [28] Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer
    Azzouni, Faris
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2012, 9 (10) : 573 - 582
  • [29] Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer
    Faris Azzouni
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2012, 9 : 573 - 582
  • [30] Current status and prospect of robot-assisted thoracic surgery: A bibliometric analysis
    Wang, Jianbo
    Wang, Bo
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (12) : 6037 - 6038