Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer:current status and perspectives

被引:2
|
作者
Roberto Biffi [1 ]
Fabrizio Luca [1 ]
Paolo Pietro Bianchi [1 ]
Sabina Cenciarelli [1 ]
Wanda Petz [1 ]
Igor Monsellato [1 ]
Manuela Valvo [1 ]
Maria Laura Cossu [1 ]
Tiago Leal Ghezzi [1 ]
Kassem Shmaissany [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European Institute of Oncology
关键词
Rectal cancer; Robotic total mesorectal excision; Robotic surgery; Robotic resection; Circumferential resection margin; Lymph node yield; Distal resection margin positivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.37 []; TP242 [机器人];
学科分类号
100214 ; 1111 ;
摘要
The laparoscopic approach for treatment of rectal cancer has been proven feasible and oncologically safe, and is able to offer better short-term outcomes than traditional open procedures, mainly in terms of reduced length of hospital stay and time to return to working activity. In spite of this, the laparoscopic technique is usually practised only in high-volume experienced centres, mainly because it requires a prolonged and demanding learning curve. It has been estimated that over 50 operations are required for an experienced colorectal surgeon to achieve proficiency with this technique. Robotic surgery enables the surgeon to perform minimally invasive operations with better vision and more intuitive and precise control of the operating instruments, thus promising to overcome some of the technical difficulties associated with standard laparoscopy. It has high-definition threedimensional vision, it translates the surgeon’s hand movements into precise movements of the instruments inside the patient, the camera is held and moved by the first surgeon, and a fourth robotic arm is available as a fixed retractor. The aim of this review is to summarise the current data on clinical and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in rectal cancer, focusing on short- and long-term results, and providing original data from the authors’ centre.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:546 / 556
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: current status and perspectives
    Biffi, Roberto
    Luca, Fabrizio
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Cenciarelli, Sabina
    Petz, Wanda
    Monsellato, Igor
    Valvo, Manuela
    Cossu, Maria Laura
    Ghezzi, Tiago Leal
    Shmaissany, Kassem
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (02) : 546 - 556
  • [2] Robot-assisted urological surgery: Current status and future perspectives
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Sammon, Jesse
    Jeong, Wooju
    Dabaja, Ali
    Menon, Mani
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 10 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [3] Current perspectives in robot-assisted surgery
    Binet, Aurelien
    Ballouhey, Quentin
    Chaussy, Yann
    de Lambert, Guenolee
    Braik, Karim
    Villemagne, Thierry
    Becmeur, Francois
    Fourcade, Laurent
    Lardy, Hubert
    MINERVA PEDIATRICA, 2018, 70 (03) : 308 - 314
  • [4] Current status of robot-assisted surgery
    Ng, Ada T. L.
    Tam, P. C.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (03) : 241 - 250
  • [5] Current status of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer
    Masato Kanzaki
    Surgery Today, 2019, 49 : 795 - 802
  • [6] Current status of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer
    Kanzaki, Masato
    SURGERY TODAY, 2019, 49 (10) : 795 - 802
  • [7] Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery
    Se-Jin Baek
    Dong-Woo Lee
    Sung-Soo Park
    Seon-Hahn Kim
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2011, 3 (10) : 137 - 143
  • [8] Robot-assisted surgery in children: Current status
    Sinha C.K.
    Haddad M.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2008, 1 (04) : 243 - 246
  • [9] Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery
    Baek, Se-Jin
    Lee, Dong-Woo
    Park, Sung-Soo
    Kim, Seon-Hahn
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 3 (10) : 137 - 143
  • [10] Current perspectives on the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer
    Park, Sung Hyun
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 14 (12) : 1181 - 1186