Impact of utilization of hepatitis C positive organs in liver transplant: Analysis of united network for organ sharing database

被引:1
|
作者
Amaninder Dhaliwal [1 ]
Banreet Dhindsa [2 ]
Daryl Ramai [3 ]
Harlan Sayles [4 ]
Saurabh Chandan [5 ]
Rajani Rangray [5 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Moffitt Cancer Center
[2] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center
[3] Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center
[4] Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center
[5] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University Medical Center
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.3 [肝及肝管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The utility of hepatitis C virus(HCV) organs has increased after the Food and Drug Administration approval of direct acting anti-viral(DAA) medications for the HCV treatment. The efficacy of DAA in treating HCV is nearly 100%.AIM To analyze the United Network for Organ Sharing(UNOS) database to compare the survival rates between the hepatitis C positive donors and negative recipients and hepatitis C negative donors and recipients.METHODS We analyzed the adult patients in UNOS database who underwent deceased donor liver transplant from January 2014 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was to compare the survival rates among the four groups with different hepatitis C donor and recipient status:(Group 1) Both donor and recipient negative for HCV(Group 2) Negative donor and positive recipient for HCV(Group 3) Positive donor and negative recipient for HCV(Group 4) Both positive donor and recipient for HCV. SAS 9.4 software was used for the data analysis.Kaplan Meier log rank test was used to analyze the estimated survival rates among the four groups.RESULTS A total of 24512 patients were included: Group 1: 16436, Group 2: 6174, Group 3: 253 and Group 4: 1649. The 1-year(Group 1: 91.8%, Group 2: 92.12%, Group 3: 87%, Group 4: 92.8%), 2-year(Group 1: 88.4%, Group 2: 88.1%, Group 3: 84.3%, Group 4: 87.5%), 3-year(Group 1: 84.9%, Group 2: 84.3%, Group 3: 75.9%, Group 4: 83.2%) survival rates showed no statistical significance among the four groups. Kaplan Meier log rank test did not show any statistical significance difference in the estimated survival rates between Group 3 vs all the other groups.CONCLUSION The survival rates in hepatitis C positive donors and negative recipients are similar as compared to both hepatitis C negative donors and recipients. This could be due to the use of DAA therapy with cure rates of nearly 100%. This study supports the use of hepatitis C positive organs in the selected group of recipients with and without HCV infection. Further long-term studies are needed to further validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 991
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting Long Term Survival in Lung Transplant: Analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database
    Sethi, J.
    Rosa, G. A. Garrido
    Patel, K.
    Sharma, N.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 38 (04): : S331 - S331
  • [22] Donor biopsy and kidney transplant outcomes: An analysis using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database
    Bajwa, Meera
    Cho, Yong W.
    Pham, Phuong-Thu
    Shah, Tariq
    Danovitch, Gabriel
    Wilkinson, Alan
    Bunnapradist, Suphamai
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 84 (11) : 1399 - 1405
  • [23] Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after pancreas transplantation: a United Network for Organ Sharing database analysis
    Jackson, K.
    Ruppert, K.
    Shapiro, R.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 27 (06) : 888 - 894
  • [24] OUTCOME OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR DRUG INDUCED ACUTE LIVER FAILURE IN THE UNITED STATES. ANALYSIS OF THE UNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING DATABASE
    Mindikoglu, Ayse L.
    Magder, Laurence S.
    Regev, Arie
    HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 48 (04) : 467A - 467A
  • [25] Outcome of Liver Transplantation for Drug-Induced Acute Liver Failure in the United States: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database
    Mindikoglu, Ayse L.
    Magder, Laurence S.
    Regev, Arie
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (07) : 719 - 729
  • [26] Impact of Ventricular Assist Device Complications on Posttransplant Survival: An Analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database
    Healy, Aaron H.
    Baird, Bradley C.
    Drakos, Stavros G.
    Stehlik, Josef
    Selzman, Craig H.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 95 (03): : 870 - 875
  • [27] Acute cellular rejection in hepatitis C recipients following liver transplantation in the era of direct-acting antivirals: chronological analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database
    Tanaka, Tomohiro
    Voigt, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2019, 26 (09) : 393 - 400
  • [28] Pancreas After Living Donor Kidney Versus Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant: An Analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing Database
    Poommipanit, Neda
    Sampaio, Marcelo Santos
    Cho, Yong
    Young, Brian
    Shah, Tariq
    Pham, Phuong-Thu
    Wilkinson, Alan
    Danovitch, Gabriel
    Bunnapradist, Suphamai
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 89 (12) : 1496 - 1503
  • [29] Bridge-to-Transplant External-Beam Radiation Therapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Utilization Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database
    Herman, T.
    Kaempf, A.
    Schlansky, B.
    Nabavizadeh, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E62 - E63
  • [30] Donor Age Still Matters in Liver Transplant: Results From the United Network for Organ Sharing-Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Database
    Montenovo, Martin I.
    Hansen, Ryan N.
    Dick, Andre A. S.
    Reyes, Jorge
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 15 (05) : 536 - 541