Field evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen test: Are rapid antigen tests less reliable among the elderly?

被引:1
|
作者
Irena Tabain [1 ]
Djivo Cucevic [2 ]
Nikola Skreb [3 ]
Anna Mrzljak [3 ,4 ]
Ivana Ferencak [1 ]
Zeljka Hruskar [1 ]
Anita Misic [1 ]
Josipa Kuzle [1 ]
Ana Marija Skoda [1 ]
Hrvojka Jankovic [1 ]
Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Virology, Croatian Institute of Public Health  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Emergency Medicine of the City of Zagreb
[2] School of Medicine, University of Zagreb
[3] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Hospital Zagreb
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R563.1 [肺炎]; R446.6 [免疫学检验];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ; 100208 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) leads to the development of accessible and cost-effective rapid antigen-detection tests(RATs), as quick and accurate diagnosis is crucial to curb the pandemic.AIM To evaluate the Humasis COVID-19 Ag Test(Humasis Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) in the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2(SARS-CoV-2).METHODS This retrospective study was carried out at the Croatian Institute of Public Health and included patients with clinical symptoms of COVID-19 lasting no longer than 5 d prior to testing, whose nasopharyngeal swabs were primarily tested with RAT. Negative RAT samples underwent confirmatory real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR). Diagnostic efficacy was determined compared to RT-PCR. The patients were divided into three age groups(< 18, 19-65, > 65 years). Statistical analysis was performed with the significance level set at P < 0.05.RESULTS In total, 2490 symptomatic patients were tested; 953 samples were positive on RAT, and 1537 were negative. All negative RAT samples were subjected to RT-PCR; 266 samples were positive and marked as false-negative results on RAT. The calculated negative predictive value as a measure of RAT efficacy was 82.69%. The c2 test and Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference in the proportion of false negatives(P < 0.001) and RT-PCR cycle(Ct) values for false-negative RATs(P = 0.012) among the age groups. The young age group was significantly less likely to be false negative, whereas the false negatives from the elderly group experienced significantly lower Ct values than the other two age groups.CONCLUSION Evaluated RAT demonstrated satisfactory performance with more reliable results in younger patients. Humasis COVID-19 Ag RAT is potentially a valuable tool in areas where access to molecular methods is limited; however, RT-PCR remains a gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
引用
收藏
页码:6456 / 6463
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Field evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen test: Are rapid antigen tests less reliable among the elderly?
    Tabain, Irena
    Cucevic, Djivo
    Skreb, Nikola
    Mrzljak, Anna
    Ferencak, Ivana
    Hruskar, Zeljka
    Misic, Anita
    Kuzle, Josipa
    Skoda, Ana Marija
    Jankovic, Hrvojka
    Vilibic-Cavlek, Tatjana
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (19) : 6456 - 6463
  • [2] Evaluation of the COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test
    Sanli, Ozlem Oguc
    Kuscu, Ozlem Ozkan
    Incekas, Caner
    FLORA INFEKSIYON HASTALIKLARI VE KLINIK MIKROBIYOLOJI DERGISI, 2023, 28 (03): : 489 - 495
  • [3] Effect of gender on the reliability of COVID-19 rapid antigen test among elderly
    Nori, Wassan
    Akram, Wisam
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (29) : 10820 - 10822
  • [4] Effect of gender on the reliability of COVID-19 rapid antigen test among elderly
    Wassan Nori
    Wisam Akram
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, 10 (29) : 10820 - 10822
  • [5] Effect of gender on the reliability of COVID-19 rapid antigen test among elderly
    Nori, Wassan
    Akram, Wisam
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12 : 10820 - 10822
  • [6] Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19
    Yamayoshi, Seiya
    Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko
    Koga, Michiko
    Akasaka, Osamu
    Nakachi, Ichiro
    Koh, Hidefumi
    Maeda, Kenji
    Adachi, Eisuke
    Saito, Makoto
    Nagai, Hiroyuki
    Ikeuchi, Kazuhiko
    Ogura, Takayuki
    Baba, Rie
    Fujita, Kensuke
    Fukui, Takahiro
    Ito, Fumimaro
    Hattori, Shin-Ichiro
    Yamamoto, Kei
    Nakamoto, Takato
    Furusawa, Yuri
    Yasuhara, Atsuhiro
    Ujie, Michiko
    Yamada, Shinya
    Ito, Mutsumi
    Mitsuya, Hiroaki
    Omagari, Norio
    Yotsuyanagi, Hiroshi
    Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko
    Imai, Masaki
    Kawaoka, Yoshihiro
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2020, 12 (12):
  • [7] Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
    Albert, Eliseo
    Torres, Ignacio
    Bueno, Felipe
    Huntley, Dixie
    Molla, Estefania
    Angel Fernandez-Fuentes, Miguel
    Martinez, Mireia
    Poujois, Sandrine
    Forque, Lorena
    Valdivia, Arantxa
    Solano de la Asuncion, Carlos
    Ferrer, Josep
    Colomina, Javier
    Navarro, David
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (03) : 472.e7 - 472.e10
  • [8] Prolonged rapid antigen test positivity among COVID-19 patients
    Sasikumar, Ashitha
    Niyas, Vettakkara Kandy Muhammed
    Arjun, Rajalakshmi
    Viswanathan, Ganesh
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 11 (04) : 1590 - 1592
  • [9] False Positive Covid-19 Rapid Antigen Tests
    Yang, Chengliang
    Espin, Estefania
    Tebbutt, Scott J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2024, 390 (19): : 1835 - 1836
  • [10] Evaluation of the diagnostic test for rapid detection of covid-19 antigen (Panbio Covid rapid test) in primary care
    Cortes Rubio, J. A.
    Costa Zamora, M. P.
    Canals Aracil, M.
    Pulgar Feio, M.
    Mata Martinez, A.
    Carrasco Munera, A.
    MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2021, 47 (08): : 508 - 514