Feasibility of prostatectomy without prostate biopsy in the era of new imaging technology and minimally invasive techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Nian-Zeng Xing [1 ]
Ming-Shuai Wang [2 ]
Qiang Fu [3 ]
Fei-Ya Yang [1 ]
Chang-Ling Li [1 ]
Ya-Jian Li [1 ]
Su-Jun Han [1 ]
Ze-Jun Xiao [1 ]
Hao Ping [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
[2] Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Department of Urology,Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University
[3] Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital
[4] Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
关键词
Prostate cancer; Biopsy; Prostatectomy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R737.25 [前列腺肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Routinely, after receiving prostate specific antigen(PSA) testing and digital rectum examination, patients with suspected prostate cancer are required to undergo prostate biopsy. However, the ability of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy to detect prostate cancer is limited. Nowadays, a variety of diagnostic methods and more sensitive diagnostic methods, such as multi-parameter prostate magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PSMA PET/CT)can be applied clinically. Furthermore, laparoscopic/robot-assisted prostatectomy is also a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. So maybe it is time to reconsider the necessary to perform prostate biopsy before radical prostatectomy.AIM To explore the feasibility of radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy in the era of new imaging technology and minimally invasive techniques.METHODSFrom June 2014 to November 2018, 11 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy were performed at the three tertiary medical centers involved in this study. All patients received prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer was suspected, including six patients with positive 68 GaPSMA PET/CT results. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were performed for all patients.RESULTS All surgeries were accomplished successfully. The mean age was 69 ± 7.7 year,the mean body mass index was 24.7 ± 1.6 kg/m2, the range of serum PSA was 4.3 to >1000 ng/mL, and the mean prostate volume was 40.9 ± 18.3 mL. The mean operative time was 96 ± 23.3 min, the mean estimated blood loss was 90 ± 90.9 m L, and the median duration of catheter placement was 14 d. The final pathology confirmed that all specimens were prostate cancer except one case of benign prostatic hyperplasia. No major complications occurred in 90 d postoperatively.CONCLUSION The current practice of mandating a prostatic biopsy before prostatectomy should be reconsidered in the era of new imaging technology and minimally invasive techniques. Radical prostatectomy could be carried out without the evidence of malignancy. Large-sample randomized controlled trials are definitely required to confirm the feasibility of this new concept.
引用
收藏
页码:1403 / 1409
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Myocardial Protection in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Evolved Techniques for the New Era of Cardiac Surgery
    Wisneski, Andrew D.
    Nguyen, Tom C.
    [J]. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 17 (02) : 88 - 91
  • [22] Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy - a new era of prostate cancer diagnosis
    Lai, T. C. T.
    Ma, W. K.
    Lam, A. K. C.
    Lam, A. C. S.
    Tsang, C. F.
    Lam, W.
    Ho, B. S. H.
    Ng, A. T. L.
    Tsu, J. H. L.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 6 - 6
  • [23] Minimally invasive techniques: the new frontier in neurosurgery
    Rabelo, Nicollas Nunes
    Sisnando da Costa, Bruno Braga
    Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
    Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 130 (01) : 330 - 331
  • [24] Emerging minimally invasive techniques for treating localized prostate cancer
    Ahmed, S
    Lindsey, B
    Davies, J
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (09) : 1230 - 1234
  • [25] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A New Era of Surgical Resection
    Treitl, Daniela
    Hurtado, Michael
    Ben-David, Kfir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 26 (04): : 276 - 280
  • [26] Minimally-invasive versus open Prostatectomy for Patients with localised Prostate Cancer
    Spek, A.
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2018, 57 (03): : 323 - 326
  • [27] Practical and cost effective use of minimally invasive breast biopsy techniques
    Hopkins, DA
    Smith, KL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2003, 196 (05) : 821 - 821
  • [28] Comparison of two minimally invasive techniques for liver biopsy collection in dogs
    Fernandez, N.
    del-Pozo, J.
    Shaw, D.
    Marques, A. I. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2017, 58 (10) : 555 - 561
  • [29] Current era minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Techniques and practice
    Malaisrie, S. Chris
    Barnhart, Glenn R.
    Farivar, R. Saeid
    Mehall, John
    Hummel, Brian
    Rodriguez, Evelio
    Anderson, Mark
    Lewis, Clifton
    Hargrove, Clark
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    Goldman, Scott
    Khan, Junaid
    Moront, Michael
    Grossi, Eugene
    Roselli, Eric E.
    Agnihotri, Arvind
    Mack, Michael J.
    Smith, J. Michael
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Duhay, Francis G.
    Kocis, Mark T.
    Ryan, William H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 147 (01): : 6 - 14
  • [30] Minimally invasive non-laser thermal techniques for prostatectomy: a systematic review
    Wheelahan, J
    Scott, NA
    Cartmill, R
    Marshall, V
    Morton, RP
    Nacey, J
    Maddern, GJ
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 86 (09) : 977 - 988