Feasibility of prostatectomy without prostate biopsy in the era of new imaging technology and minimally invasive techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Nian-Zeng Xing [1 ]
Ming-Shuai Wang [2 ]
Qiang Fu [3 ]
Fei-Ya Yang [1 ]
Chang-Ling Li [1 ]
Ya-Jian Li [1 ]
Su-Jun Han [1 ]
Ze-Jun Xiao [1 ]
Hao Ping [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
[2] Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Department of Urology,Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University
[3] Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital
[4] Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
关键词
Prostate cancer; Biopsy; Prostatectomy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R737.25 [前列腺肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Routinely, after receiving prostate specific antigen(PSA) testing and digital rectum examination, patients with suspected prostate cancer are required to undergo prostate biopsy. However, the ability of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy to detect prostate cancer is limited. Nowadays, a variety of diagnostic methods and more sensitive diagnostic methods, such as multi-parameter prostate magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PSMA PET/CT)can be applied clinically. Furthermore, laparoscopic/robot-assisted prostatectomy is also a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. So maybe it is time to reconsider the necessary to perform prostate biopsy before radical prostatectomy.AIM To explore the feasibility of radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy in the era of new imaging technology and minimally invasive techniques.METHODSFrom June 2014 to November 2018, 11 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy were performed at the three tertiary medical centers involved in this study. All patients received prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer was suspected, including six patients with positive 68 GaPSMA PET/CT results. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were performed for all patients.RESULTS All surgeries were accomplished successfully. The mean age was 69 ± 7.7 year,the mean body mass index was 24.7 ± 1.6 kg/m2, the range of serum PSA was 4.3 to >1000 ng/mL, and the mean prostate volume was 40.9 ± 18.3 mL. The mean operative time was 96 ± 23.3 min, the mean estimated blood loss was 90 ± 90.9 m L, and the median duration of catheter placement was 14 d. The final pathology confirmed that all specimens were prostate cancer except one case of benign prostatic hyperplasia. No major complications occurred in 90 d postoperatively.CONCLUSION The current practice of mandating a prostatic biopsy before prostatectomy should be reconsidered in the era of new imaging technology and minimally invasive techniques. Radical prostatectomy could be carried out without the evidence of malignancy. Large-sample randomized controlled trials are definitely required to confirm the feasibility of this new concept.
引用
收藏
页码:1403 / 1409
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility of prostatectomy without prostate biopsy in the era of new imaging technology and minimally invasive techniques
    Xing, Nian-Zeng
    Wang, Ming-Shuai
    Fu, Qiang
    Yang, Fei-Ya
    Li, Chang-Ling
    Li, Ya-Jian
    Han, Su-Jun
    Xiao, Ze-Jun
    Ping, Hao
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2019, 7 (12) : 1403 - 1409
  • [2] Imaging guidance in minimally invasive prostatectomy
    Gupta, Angela D.
    Han, Misop
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (03) : 343 - 346
  • [3] The new era of minimally invasive interventions for prostate cancer: robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and focal therapy
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Louis, Alyssa S.
    Lindner, Uri
    [J]. OPEN ACCESS SURGERY, 2011, 4 : 45 - 51
  • [4] The post PSA era: new developments in biomarkers, imaging and biopsy techniques in prostate cancer detection
    Wadhwa, Karan
    Barrett, Tristan
    Kastner, Christof
    [J]. TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MENS HEALTH, 2015, 6 (04) : 25 - +
  • [5] Minimally invasive laser techniques for prostatectomy: a systematic review
    Wheelahan, J
    Scott, NA
    Cartmill, R
    Marshall, V
    Morton, RP
    Nacey, J
    Maddern, GJ
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 86 (07) : 805 - 815
  • [6] Minimally invasive therapies made possible by new imaging technology
    L. William Traverso
    Dan Deziel
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2000, 4 (4) : i - i
  • [7] Minimally invasive therapies made possible by new imaging technology
    Traverso, LW
    Deziel, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2000, 4 (04) : 331 - 331
  • [8] Feasibility of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients with high prostate-specific antigen: Feasibility and 1-year outcomes
    Do, Minh
    Ragavan, Narasimhan
    Dietel, Anja
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Anderson, Chris
    McNeill, Alan
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (10) : 923 - 927
  • [9] Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate Without Invasive Carcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Emphasis on Radical Prostatectomy Findings
    Robinson, Brian D.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (04): : 1328 - 1333
  • [10] Robotic radical prostatectomy: A minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer
    Tewari A.
    Kaul S.
    Menon M.
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2005, 6 (1) : 45 - 48