The construction of shale rock physics model and brittleness prediction for high-porosity shale gas-bearing reservoir

被引:1
|
作者
Xin-Peng Pan [1 ,2 ]
Guang-Zhi Zhang [2 ]
Jiao-Jiao Chen [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Geoscience and Info-Physics, Central South University
[2] School of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum(East China)
关键词
Shale gas; Rock physics model; Brittleness prediction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P618.13 [石油、天然气];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Due to the huge differences between the unconventional shale and conventional sand reservoirs in many aspects such as the types and the characteristics of minerals, matrix pores and fluids, the construction of shale rock physics model is significant for the exploration and development of shale reservoirs. To make a better characterization of shale gas-bearing reservoirs, we first propose a new but more suitable rock physics model to characterize the reservoirs. We then use a well A to demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of the proposed rock physics model of shale gas-bearing reservoirs. Moreover, we propose a new brittleness indicator for the high-porosity and organic-rich shale gas-bearing reservoirs. Based on the parameter analysis using the constructed rock physics model, we finally compare the new brittleness indicator with the commonly used Young’s modulus in the content of quartz and organic matter, the matrix porosity, and the types of filled fluids. We also propose a new shale brittleness index by integrating the proposed new brittleness indicator and the Poisson’s ratio. Tests on real data sets demonstrate that the new brittleness indicator and index are more sensitive than the commonly used Young’s modulus and brittleness index for the high-porosity and high-brittleness shale gas-bearing reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 670
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of rock physics response of gas-bearing volcanic reservoir based on three-phase poroelastic theory
    Qingling Wu
    Haibo Zhao
    Lailin Li
    Xingcai Fan
    Applied Geophysics, 2008, 5 : 277 - 283
  • [42] Rock physics model-based prediction of shear wave velocity in the Barnett Shale formation
    Guo, Zhiqi
    Li, Xiang-Yang
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 12 (03) : 527 - 534
  • [43] Construction of a 3D Geomechanical Model for Development of a Shale Gas Reservoir in the Sichuan Basin
    Xie, Jun
    Qiu, Kaibin
    Zhong, Bing
    Pan, Yuanwei
    Shi, Xuewen
    Wang, Lizhi
    SPE DRILLING & COMPLETION, 2018, 33 (04) : 275 - 297
  • [44] Occurrence of moisture in deep gas-bearing shale matrix and its impacts on methane adsorption/desorption capability under favorable reservoir conditions
    Zhang, Dengfeng
    Cai, Xuewei
    Xu, Yi
    Tang, Xing
    Su, Hanxing
    RSC ADVANCES, 2023, 13 (42) : 29291 - 29307
  • [45] Prediction of methane adsorption content in continental coal-bearing shale reservoir using SLD model
    Zhang, Jizhen
    Tang, Youjun
    Chen, Daye
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15) : 1839 - 1845
  • [46] Petrophysical approach for estimating porosity, clay volume, and water saturation in gas-bearing shale: A case study from the Horn River Basin, Canada
    Kim, Taeyoun
    Hwang, Seho
    Jang, Seonghyung
    AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 109 (02): : 289 - 298
  • [47] Evaluation of gas-bearing property for shale reservoir and its influence factors analysis: Taking Changning-Weiyuan national experimental zone as an example
    Li, Wu-Guang
    Zhong, Bing
    Yang, Hong-Zhi
    Feng, Xi
    Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25 (10) : 1653 - 1660
  • [48] An evaluation of empirical and rock physics models to estimate shear wave velocity in a potential shale gas reservoir using wireline logs
    Sohail, Ghulam Mohyuddin
    Hawkes, Christopher D.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 185
  • [50] Shear wave velocity prediction of shale oil formations based on machine learning and improved rock physics model
    Fang Z.
    Ba J.
    Xiong F.
    Yang Z.
    Yan X.
    Ruan C.
    Shiyou Diqiu Wuli Kantan/Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2024, 59 (03): : 381 - 391