Pesticide food safety standards as companions to tolerances and maximum residue limits

被引:0
|
作者
Carl K Winter [1 ]
Elizabeth A Jara [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Food Science and Technology,University of California
关键词
pesticide residues; food safety; tolerances; maximum residue limits(MRLs); regulation; reference dose; captan; strawberries;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS207.53 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Allowable levels for pesticide residues in foods,known as tolerances in the US and as maximum residue limits(MRLs) in much of the world,are widely yet inappropriately perceived as levels of safety concern. A novel approach to develop scientifically defensible levels of safety concern is presented and an example to determine acute and chronic pesticide food safety standard(PFSS) levels for the fungicide captan on strawberries is provided. Using this approach,the chronic PFSS level for captan on strawberries was determined to be 2 000 mg kg–1 and the acute PFSS level was determined to be 250 mg kg–1. Both levels are far above the existing tolerance and MRLs that commonly range from 3 to 20 mg kg–1,and provide evidence that captan residues detected at levels greater than the tolerance or MRLs are not of acute or chronic health concern even though they represent violative residues. The benefits of developing the PFSS approach to serve as a companion to existing tolerances/MRLs include a greater understanding concerning the health significance,if any,from exposure to violative pesticide residues. In addition,the PFSS approach can be universally applied to all potential pesticide residues on all food commodities,can be modified by specific jurisdictions to take into account differences in food consumption practices,and can help prioritize food residue monitoring by identifying the pesticide/commodity combinations of the greatest potential food safety concern and guiding development of field level analytical methods to detect pesticide residues on prioritized pesticide/commodity combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:2358 / 2364
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effects of consumer beliefs on responses to pesticide residue concerns: Implications for food safety policy
    Deodhar, SY
    Fletcher, SM
    Hubbell, BJ
    Misra, SK
    CONSUMER INTERESTS ANNUAL, VOL 43: 43RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAN COUNCIL ON CONSUMER INTERESTS, 1997, : 107 - 112
  • [33] Food safety, sense of safety and pesticide
    Kamoshita, K
    JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 2006, 31 (02) : 230 - 231
  • [34] Analysis of Tea pesticide residue standards and testing methods
    Chen, Jing
    Rui, Jia-ming
    Liu, Xiao-rong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINERY, MATERIALS, ENVIRONMENT, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTER (MMEBC), 2016, 88 : 876 - 879
  • [35] Food: pesticide residues are in the legal limits
    Costa, C.
    CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE, 2015, 50 (03): : 123 - 124
  • [36] CODEX ALIMENTARIUS APPROACH TO PESTICIDE-RESIDUE STANDARDS
    MAYBURY, RB
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS, 1989, 72 (03): : 538 - 541
  • [37] Global Harmonization of Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides
    Ambrus, Arpad
    Yang, Yong Zhen
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2016, 64 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [38] Estimation methods for Maximum Residue Limits for pesticides
    MacLachlan, Dugald J.
    Hamilton, Denis
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 58 (02) : 208 - 218
  • [39] Europe as a global regulator? The limits of EU influence in international food safety standards
    Young, Alasdair R.
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 21 (06) : 904 - 922
  • [40] Multi residue methods to pesticide analysis in food control - possibilities and limits - part 1: comparison of methods
    Hemmerling, Christlieb
    Augustyniak, Bettina
    Maye, Astrid
    Seidl, Gilda
    Warschewske, Guido
    DEUTSCHE LEBENSMITTEL-RUNDSCHAU, 2009, 105 (04) : 245 - 252