Diffusion-tensor imaging as an adjunct to dynamic contrastenhanced MRI for improved accuracy of differential diagnosis between breast ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Yuan Wang [1 ]
Xiaopeng Zhang [1 ]
Kun Cao [1 ]
Yanling Li [1 ]
Xiaoting Li [1 ]
Liping Qi [1 ]
Lei Tang [1 ]
Zhilong Wang [1 ]
Shunyu Gao [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research(Ministry of Education),Department of Radiology,Peking University Cancer Hospital& Institute
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast carcinoma in situ; diffusion tensor imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; breast;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R737.9 [乳腺肿瘤];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To determine the value of diffusion-tensor imaging(DTI) as an adjunct to dynamic contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging(DCE-MRI) for improved accuracy of differential diagnosis between breast ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) and invasive breast carcinoma(IBC).Methods:The MRI data of 63 patients pathologically confirmed as breast cancer were analyzed.The conventional MRI analysis metrics included enhancement style,initial enhancement characteristic,maximum slope of increase,time to peak,time signal intensity curve(TIC) pattern,and signal intensity on FST2 WI.The values of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC),directionally-averaged mean diffusivity(D),exponential attenuation(EA),fractional anisotropy(FA),volume ratio(VR) and relative anisotropy(RA)were calculated and compared between DCIS and IBC.Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent factors for distinguishing IBC and DCIS.The diagnostic performance of the diagnosis equation was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve.The diagnostic efficacies of DCEMRI,DWI and DTI were compared independendy or combined.Results:EA value,lesion enhancement style and TIC pattern were identified as independent factor for differential diagnosis of IBC and DCIS.The combination diagnosis showed higher diagnostic efficacy than a single use of DCE-MRI(P=0.02),and the area of the curve was improved from 0.84(95%CI,0.67-0.99) to0.94(95%CI,0.85-1.00).Conclusions:Quantitative DTI measurement as an adjunct to DCE-MRI could improve the diagnostic performance of differential diagnosis between DCIS and IBC compared to a single use of DCE-MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 217
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Role of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Nadrljanski, Mirjan
    Milosevic, Zorica
    Plesinac-Karapandzic, Vesna
    Goldner, Branislav
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2013, 141 (5-6) : 402 - 408
  • [22] Underestimation of invasive breast carcinoma in patients with initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: Size matters
    Bouzon Alejandro, Alberto
    Iglesias Lopez, Angela
    Acea Nebril, Benigno
    Garcia Jimenez, Maria Lourdes
    Diaz Carballada, Carlota Czestokowa
    Varela Romero, Jose Ramon
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2021, 99 (09): : 655 - 659
  • [23] Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma
    Ding, Jian-Rong
    Wang, Dong-Nv
    Pan, Jing-Li
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 744 - 750
  • [24] Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: A guide to the selective carcinoma in situ
    T. W. Yen
    N. Mirza
    K. Hunt
    M. Ross
    G. Babiera
    S. E. Singletary
    F. Meric-Bernstam
    B. Feig
    F. Ames
    H. Kuerer
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2004, 11 : S93 - S93
  • [25] Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: A guide to the selective carcinoma in situ
    Yen, TW
    Mirza, N
    Hunt, K
    Ross, M
    Babiera, G
    Singletary, SE
    Meric-Bernstam, F
    Feig, B
    Ames, F
    Kuerer, H
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) : S93 - S93
  • [26] Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: Ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma
    Nadrljanski, Mirjan
    Maksimovic, Ruzica
    Plesinac-Karapandzia, Vesna
    Nikitovic, Marina
    Markovic-Vasiljkovic, Biljana
    Milosevic, Zorica
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (08) : 1363 - 1367
  • [27] Could breast multiparametric MRI discriminate between pure ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma?
    Rizzo, Veronica
    Cicciarelli, Federica
    Galati, Francesca
    Moffa, Giuliana
    Maroncelli, Roberto
    Pasculli, Marcella
    Pediconi, Federica
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2024, 65 (06) : 565 - 574
  • [28] Immunohistochemistry Applied to the Differential Diagnosis Between Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast
    Moura, Rafael de Deus
    Wludarski, Sheila C. L.
    Carvalho, Filomena M.
    Bacchi, Carlos E.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2013, 21 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [29] Predictive biomarkers of invasive carcinoma on excision in patients with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by needle biopsy
    Mori, Miki
    Krings, Gregor
    Chan, Loretta
    Wolf, Denise
    Chen, Yunn-Yi
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Tlsty, Thea D.
    Coppe, Jean-Philippe
    Matsuda, Naoko
    Suzuki, Koyu
    Nakamura, Seigo
    van't Veer, Laura
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [30] Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Noninvasive Imaging Biomarker for the Differentiation of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Bickel, Hubert
    Pinker-Domenig, Katja
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Spick, Claudio
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Weber, Michael
    Helbich, Thomas
    Baltzer, Pascal
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (02) : 95 - 100