Short-term therapeutic outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: a propensity score matching study

被引:3
|
作者
Chen Huan
Qu Min
Lian Bi-Jun
Wang Hai-Feng
Wang Yan
Dong Zhen-Yang
Zhu Feng
Shi Zhen-Kai
Jia Ze-Peng
Sun Ying-Hao
Gao Xu
机构
[1] China
[2] Department of Minimally Invasive Urology Center
[3] Second Military Medical University
[4] Department of Urology
[5] Shanghai 200043
[6] Changhai Hospital
关键词
Oligometastatic; Prostate cancer; Robotics; Propensity score matching;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Background: The role of local treatment in oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is gaining interest with the oligometastases hypothesis proposed and the improvement of various surgical methods and techniques. This study aimed to compare the short-term therapeutic outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) for oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPC)vs. localized PCa using propensity score matching.Methods: Totally 508 consecutive patients underwent RALP as a first-line treatment. The patients were divided into two groups according to oligometastatic state: the OPC group (n = 41) or the localized PCa group (n = 467). Oligometastatic disease was defined as the presence of two or fewer suspicious lesions. The association between the oligometastatic state and therapeutic outcomes of RALP was evaluated, including biochemical recurrence (BCR) and overall survival (OS). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the possible risk factors for BCR.Results: Totally 41 pairs of patients were matched. The median operative time, the median blood loss, the overall positive surgical margin rate, the median post-operative hospital stays, and the post-operative urinary continence recovery rate between the two groups showed no statistical significance. The 4-year BCR survival rates of the OPC group and localized PCa group were 56.7% and 60.8%, respectively, without a significant difference (P= 0.804). The 5-year OS rates were 96.3% and 100%, respectively (P = 0.326). Additionally, the results of Cox regression showed that oligometastatic state was not an independent risk factor for BCR (P = 0.682).Conclusions: Our findings supported the safety and effectiveness of RALP in OPC. Additionally, oligometastatic state and sites did not have an adverse effect on BCR independently.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial outcomes of 500 cases
    Yilmaz, Kayhan
    Ayranci, Ali
    Erdi, Eren
    Ozsoy, Cagatay
    Taha-Olcucu, Mahmut
    Ekrem-Islamoglu, Mahmut
    Savas, Murat
    Ates, Mutlu
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2022, 90 (06): : 770 - 774
  • [32] A comparative histopathologic study of prostate cancer treated by conventional radical prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A series of 1006 cases
    Gonzalez-Berjon, J. M.
    Miles, B. J.
    Shen, S.
    Gardner, J. M.
    Zhai, Q.
    Ayala, A. G.
    Ro, J.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2008, 21 : 158A - 158A
  • [33] Comparative histopathologic study of prostate cancer treated by conventional radical prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A series of 1006 cases
    Gonzalez-Berjon, J. M.
    Miles, B. J.
    Shen, S.
    Gardner, J. M.
    Zhai, Q.
    Ayala, A. G.
    Ro, J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2008, 88 : 158A - 158A
  • [34] COMPARISON OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL BETWEEN ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND RETROPUBIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS
    Hirasawa, Yosuke
    Ohori, Makoto
    Shimodaira, Kenji
    Kashima, Takeshi
    Gondo, Tatsuo
    Nakagami, Yoshihiro
    Horiguchi, Yutaka
    Ohno, Yoshio
    Namiki, Kazunori
    Yoshioka, Kunihiko
    Nakashima, Jun
    Tachibana, Masaaki
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E758 - E759
  • [35] Analysis of Factors Affecting Functional Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyAnalysis of Factors Affecting Functional Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Kizilay, Fuat
    Ismaylov, Fuad
    Simsir, Adnan
    Turna, Burak
    Semerci, Bulent
    Apaydin, Erdal
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2018, 17 (03): : 84 - 88
  • [36] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: EVALUATION OF LEARNING CURVE OUTCOMES LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES WITH RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY
    Caballero Romeu, J. P.
    Palacios Ramos, J.
    Pereira Arias, J. G.
    Gamarra Quintanilla, M.
    Astobieta Odriozola, A.
    Ibarluzea Gonzalez, G.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2008, 32 (10): : 968 - 975
  • [37] A SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED VS LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL RESECTION
    Casillas, M.
    Cleary, R.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E201 - E202
  • [38] Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Allan, Christie
    Ilic, Dragan
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (04) : 373 - 378
  • [39] Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis
    Firas Abdollah
    Deepansh Dalela
    Akshay Sood
    Jesse Sammon
    Wooju Jeong
    Burkhard Beyer
    Nicola Fossati
    Craig G. Rogers
    Mireya Diaz-Insua
    James Peabody
    Alexander Haese
    Francesco Montorsi
    Markus Graefen
    Alberto Briganti
    Mani Menon
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 1357 - 1366
  • [40] Outcomes assessment in men undergoing open retropubic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Yu, Hua-yin
    Ulmer, William
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Hu, Jim C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (01) : 85 - 89