减税降费、企业进入退出和全要素生产率

被引:81
|
作者
田磊
陆雪琴
机构
[1] 浙江财经大学财政税务学院
基金
浙江省自然科学基金;
关键词
减税降费; 企业进入退出; 选择效应; 异质性企业模型;
D O I
10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.20211123.001
中图分类号
F812.42 [税收]; F279.2 [中国];
学科分类号
摘要
本文构建嵌入进入退出机制的异质性企业动态一般均衡模型,量化研究削减在位企业税费("减税")、降低潜在进入企业市场进入费用("降费")对全要素生产率、企业动态等宏观经济变量的长期影响。本文发现:(1)减税能够在一定程度上提高全要素生产率水平和总产出,但会抑制企业动态(企业退出率降低);降费能够有效提高全要素生产率水平和总产出,活跃企业动态;(2)在实施减税降费政策时,适度增加与居民消费呈互补关系的政府消费的份额能够促进全要素生产率和总产出的提升。主要政策启示:减税和降费应协调推进,不可偏废,既要通过减税增大在位企业的继续经营价值,又要通过降费保持市场竞争压力,两者共同促使企业不断进化,提高效率,进而实现宏观经济的高质量增长。
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 77
页数:22
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [11] Lumpy Investment, Business Cycles, and Stimulus Policy
    Winberry, Thomas
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (01): : 364 - 396
  • [12] Reviving american entrepreneurship? tax reform and business dynamism[J] . Petr Sedlacek,Vincent Sterk.Journal of Monetary Economics . 2019 (C)
  • [13] Taxation and the life cycle of firms[J] . Andrés Erosa,Beatriz González.Journal of Monetary Economics . 2019
  • [14] Aggregate consequences of credit subsidy policies: Firm dynamics and misallocation[J] . In Hwan Jo,Tatsuro Senga.Review of Economic Dynamics . 2019
  • [15] Costly Labour Adjustment: General Equilibrium Effects of China's Employment Regulations and Financial Reforms[J] . Russell Cooper,Guan Gong,Ping Yan.The Economic Journal . 2018 (613)
  • [16] Entry, Exit, Firm Dynamics, and Aggregate Fluctuations[J] . American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics . 2016 (3)
  • [17] Trends and Cycles in China’s Macroeconomy[J] . Chun Chang,Kaiji Chen,Daniel F. Waggoner,Tao Zha.NBER Macroeconomics Annual . 2015 (1)
  • [18] Grasp the Large, Let Go of the Small: The Transformation of the State Sector in China[J] . CHANG-TAI HSIEH,ZHENG MICHAEL SONG.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity . 2015
  • [19] Dynamic Inputs and Resource (Mis)Allocation
    Asker, John
    Collard-Wexler, Allan
    De Loecker, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2014, 122 (05) : 1013 - 1063
  • [20] MISALLOCATION AND MANUFACTURING TFP IN CHINA AND INDIA
    Hsieh, Chang-Tai
    Klenow, Peter J.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2009, 124 (04): : 1403 - 1448