Land-use planning in China:Past, present, and future

被引:0
|
作者
CHEN Wanxu [1 ,2 ]
PAN Sipei [3 ]
YE Xinyue [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Geography, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences
[2] Research Center for Spatial Planning and Human-Environmental System Simulation, China University of Geosciences
[3] School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences
[4] Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, College Station
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划]; F301.2 [土地管理、规划及利用]; F205 [资源、环境和生态管理];
学科分类号
020106 ; 0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ; 083306 ; 0903 ; 120405 ;
摘要
Under the framework of ecological civilisation, the formulation of territorial spatial planning(TSP) and improvement of spatial governance systems are of great practical significance. Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, land-use planning(LUP) has experienced profound changes, and tremendous research efforts have been made in that field. However, systematic studies on LUP history are scarce.To bridge the existing gap, this study traced back to the emergence of LUP, described its practice stages, and analysed the evolution of its classification system and methods.Further, the three rounds of general LUP practice and the current TSP over the past 40 years of the reform and opening-up have been discussed. The evolution of LUP was found to be closely related to economic development and could be broadly divided into four stages. The development of land-use classification in China has been slow and can be divided into five stages according to the evolution of the land classification system and important historical events. The development of LUP methods can be divided into two stages, before and after 1978. Since the economic reform, China has successively conducted three rounds of general LUP under different institutional and policy backgrounds. Future development should aim to innovate the theories and methods of TSP with Chinese characteristics and promote the study of village planning and the construction of TSP systems to achieve rural revitalisation and ecological civilisation.
引用
收藏
页码:1527 / 1552
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land-use planning in China: Past, present, and future
    Chen Wanxu
    Pan Sipei
    Ye Xinyue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 33 (07) : 1527 - 1552
  • [2] Land-use planning in China: Past, present, and future
    Wanxu Chen
    Sipei Pan
    Xinyue Ye
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2023, 33 (7) : 1527 - 1552
  • [3] Past, present and future land-use in Xishuangbanna, China and the implications for carbon dynamics
    Li, Hongmei
    Ma, Youxin
    Aide, T. Mitchell
    Liu, Wenjun
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 255 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [4] Land-use changes in Portuguese mountain areas: past, present and future
    Coelho, COA
    Carvalho, TMM
    Ferreira, AJD
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE IN THE MOUNTAINS, 1999, : 123 - 124
  • [5] Past, present and future of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from Land-Use Planning (LUP)
    Pasman, Hans
    Reniers, Genserik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2014, 28 : 2 - 9
  • [6] Land Use in Australia: Past, Present and Future
    Lane, Ruth
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (04) : 489 - 491
  • [7] Discussion on Evolution of Land-use Planning in China
    CAI Yumei
    [J]. China City Planning Review, 2009, 18 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [8] Land-use/transport interaction models - Past and future
    Wilson, AG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1998, 32 : 3 - +
  • [9] The Impact of Household Dynamics on Land-Use Change in China: Past Experiences and Future Implications
    Luo, Yaxue
    Chen, Ruishan
    Xiong, Bo
    Jia, Nan
    Guo, Xiaona
    Yin, Chenglong
    Song, Wen
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [10] Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: Present, trend and future
    Wang, Jing
    Chen, Yongqi
    Shao, Xiaomei
    Zhang, Yanyu
    Cao, Yingui
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2012, 29 (04) : 737 - 749