Computational intelligence approach for uncertainty quantification using evidence theory

被引:0
|
作者
Bin Suo [1 ]
Yongsheng Cheng [1 ]
Chao Zeng [1 ]
Jun Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Electronic Engineering,China Academy of Engineering Physics
关键词
uncertainty quantification(UQ); evidence theory; hybrid algorithm; interval algorithm; genetic algorithm(GA);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O211 [概率论(几率论、或然率论)];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
As an alternative or complementary approach to the classical probability theory,the ability of the evidence theory in uncertainty quantification(UQ) analyses is subject of intense research in recent years.Two state-of-the-art numerical methods,the vertex method and the sampling method,are commonly used to calculate the resulting uncertainty based on the evidence theory.The vertex method is very effective for the monotonous system,but not for the non-monotonous one due to its high computational errors.The sampling method is applicable for both systems.But it always requires a high computational cost in UQ analyses,which makes it inefficient in most complex engineering systems.In this work,a computational intelligence approach is developed to reduce the computational cost and improve the practical utility of the evidence theory in UQ analyses.The method is demonstrated on two challenging problems proposed by Sandia National Laboratory.Simulation results show that the computational efficiency of the proposed method outperforms both the vertex method and the sampling method without decreasing the degree of accuracy.Especially,when the numbers of uncertain parameters and focal elements are large,and the system model is non-monotonic,the computational cost is five times less than that of the sampling method.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 260
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Uncertainty reduction and quantification in computational thermodynamics
    Otis, Richard
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2022, 212
  • [32] Uncertainty quantification in reservoirs with faults using a sequential approach
    Samuel Estes
    Clint Dawson
    [J]. Computational Geosciences, 2021, 25 : 851 - 869
  • [33] Uncertainty quantification in reservoirs with faults using a sequential approach
    Estes, Samuel
    Dawson, Clint
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2021, 25 (03) : 851 - 869
  • [34] HIGH DIMENSIONAL UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION USING THE DERIVATIVE APPROACH
    Kubicek, M.
    Minisci, E.
    [J]. 11TH WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS; 5TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS; 6TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, VOLS V - VI, 2014, : 6446 - 6457
  • [35] Uncertainty quantification in game theory
    de Cursi, Eduardo Souza
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2021, 143
  • [36] An Approach to Quality of Service Evaluation Using Computational Intelligence
    Salcedo, Octavio J.
    Sierra, Freddy A.
    Hernandez, Cesar
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW TRENDS IN INFORMATION AND SERVICE SCIENCE (NISS 2009), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 580 - 585
  • [37] Towards an evidence-based approach to communicating uncertainty in intelligence analysis
    Dhami, Mandeep K.
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY, 2018, 33 (02) : 257 - 272
  • [38] Review of Uncertainty Quantification of Measurement and Computational Modeling in EMC Part II: Computational Uncertainty
    Lallechere, Sebastien
    Carobbi, Carlo F. M.
    Arnaut, Luk R.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2019, 61 (06) : 1699 - 1706
  • [39] Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian process, Part 1: Theory
    Wu, Xu
    Kozlowski, Tomasz
    Meidani, Hadi
    Shirvan, Koroush
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 335 : 339 - 355
  • [40] Computational Web intelligence and granular Web intelligence for Web uncertainty
    Zhang, YQ
    [J]. 2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRANULAR COMPUTING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 99 - 101