Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Cattle Behavior Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Ibrahim, Tumwesige [1 ]
Isaac, Kawooya Barry [1 ]
Francis, Bwogi [1 ]
Lule, Emmanuel [1 ]
Hellen, Nakayiza [2 ]
Chongomweru, Halimu [3 ]
Marvin, Ggaliwango [1 ]
机构
[1] Makerere Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Muni Univ, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Arua, Uganda
[3] Makerere Univ, Dept Informat Technol, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
Cattle Behavior; Machine learning (ML); Interpretable ML; Predictive Monitoring; Agriculture Informatics; Signal Processing;
D O I
10.1109/ICSCSS60660.2024.10625182
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Cattle behavior prediction and monitoring is crucial in determining the health of cattle. This study intends to evaluate various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, using the data collected from 18 cows. Data collection was done from sensors, which included the Afimilk Silent Herdsman Collar that records the raw acceleration values from a 3-axis MEMs accelerometer at a frequency of 10 Hz, and the Rumiwatch Halter device that measure the pressure created by the jaw movements and provide classifications at 10Hz. The data collected include the classifications of the behaviors viz. "Other behavior", "Ruminating", "Drinking/eating". The data was first pre-processed before analysis. Feature extraction was done on the dataset to create 94 new features. Classification performance was investigated with 8 machine learning models (gradient boosting, random forests (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression, classification and regression trees (CART), support vector machines (SVM), Naive Bayes). The accuracy scores of the models were 0.81, 0.80, 0.80, 0.77, 0.76, 0.75, 0.64, 0.56 respectively. For model interpretability, XAI techniques were applied, specifically LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) and SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations). Additionally Eli5 was used to investigate the feature's importance for the best performing model. Many studies have proposed various ML methods for cattle behavior prediction without interpretatbility. This study aims to interpret the predictions of these ML algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1224
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interpretable machine learning for genomics
    Watson, David S.
    HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 141 (09) : 1499 - 1513
  • [22] Interpretable machine learning for genomics
    David S. Watson
    Human Genetics, 2022, 141 : 1499 - 1513
  • [23] Interpretable Machine Learning for TabPFN
    Rundel, David
    Kobialka, Julius
    von Crailsheim, Constantin
    Feurer, Matthias
    Nagler, Thomas
    Ruegamer, David
    EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PT II, XAI 2024, 2024, 2154 : 465 - 476
  • [24] Interpretable Machine Learning in Healthcare
    Ahmad, Muhammad Aurangzeb
    Eckert, Carly
    Teredesai, Ankur
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS (ICHI), 2018, : 447 - 447
  • [25] Interpretable Machine Learning in Healthcare
    Ahmad, Muhammad Aurangzeb
    Eckert, Carly
    Teredesai, Ankur
    ACM-BCB'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2018, : 559 - 560
  • [26] Development of an Interpretable Maritime Accident Prediction System Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Kim, Gyeongho
    Lim, Sunghoon
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 41313 - 41329
  • [27] Predicting the travel mode choice with interpretable machine learning techniques: A comparative study
    Kashifi, Mohammad Tamim
    Jamal, Arshad
    Kashefi, Mohammad Samim
    Almoshaogeh, Meshal
    Rahman, Syed Masiur
    TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2022, 29 : 279 - 296
  • [28] Using interpretable machine learning techniques to analyze the thermal decomposition behavior of high-energy compounds for dataset partitioning
    Huang, Chaoyi
    Yang, Chunming
    He, Yingjie
    2024 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, NETWORKS AND INTERNET OF THINGS, CNIOT 2024, 2024, : 155 - 160
  • [29] A Systematic Mapping Study on Machine Learning Techniques Applied for Condition Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance in the Manufacturing Sector
    Phan, Thuy Linh Jenny
    Gehrhardt, Ingolf
    Heik, David
    Bahrpeyma, Fouad
    Reichelt, Dirk
    LOGISTICS-BASEL, 2022, 6 (02):
  • [30] Machine Learning Techniques for Classification of Livestock Behavior
    Kleanthous, Natasa
    Hussain, Abir
    Mason, Alex
    Sneddon, Jennifer
    Shaw, Andy
    Fergus, Paul
    Chalmers, Carl
    Al-Jumeily, Dhiya
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICONIP 2018), PT IV, 2018, 11304 : 304 - 315