Comparison of patients who meet criteria for surgical stabilization of rib fractures versus those who actually get rib fixation: A single center review

被引:0
|
作者
Bauman, Zachary M. [1 ]
Khan, Hason [1 ]
Phillips, Jakob [1 ]
Wells, Alyssa [1 ]
Evans, Charity H. [1 ]
Liu, John L. [1 ]
Kamien, Andrew [1 ]
Cemaj, Samuel [1 ]
Sheppard, Olabisi [1 ]
Lamb, Gina [1 ]
Veatch, Jessica [1 ]
Nguyen, Jonathan [2 ]
Matos, Mike [1 ]
Cantrell, Emily [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Emergency Gen Surg & Crit Care Surg, 983280 Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Grady Mem Hosp, Div Acute Care Surg, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
Surgical stabilization of rib fractures; Rib fractures; Contraindications; Indications; Incidence; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPERATIVE FIXATION; FLAIL CHEST; TRAUMA; MANAGEMENT; ASSOCIATION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2024.111930
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has shown benefits for rib fracture patients. However, the incidence of SSRF performed remains low. We compare our institution's rib fracture patients meeting criteria for SSRF versus those actually receiving the operation, hypothesizing a significant portion are not undergoing SSRF. Methods: A retrospective review of rib fracture patients presenting to our Level 1 trauma center from 1/2016 to 4/2023. Patients were categorized as those who met SSRF inclusion criteria versus those who didn't based on the 2023 Chest Wall Injury Society (CWIS) SSRF Guidelines. Basic demographics were obtained. Patients meeting SSRF criteria were divided into those who received SSRF versus those who didn't. Outcomes of interest included type and frequency of SSRF indications and frequency of absolute/relative contraindications. Descriptive statistics were used. Median test and t-test were used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 3,432 patients presented with >= 1 rib fracture(s). Of those, 1,573(45.8 %) met SSRF inclusion criteria. These patients were predominantly male, with mean age of 57.4(+/- 18.5) and a similar Injury Severity Score but significantly higher chest-Abbreviated Injury Score of 3 (Interquartile range 3,4)(p = 0.048). Only 458 (29.1 %) patients underwent SSRF, leaving 1,115(70.9 %) managed non-operatively, of which 215(19.3 %) were ventilated and "failure to wean from the ventilator" was the most common (81.4 %) indication for SSRF. Of the 900(80.7 %) non-ventilated patients managed non-operatively, 659 (69.9 %) had >= two indications for SSRF, 382 (34.3 %) had zero relative contraindications and 394(35.3 %) had one relative contraindication for SSRF. Lastly, 52.6 % of patients in this cohort had reported "clicking/popping" of their fractures. Conclusion: Only 29.1 % of patients meeting criteria for SSRF had the operation based on data from our institution. There may be additional opportunity to benefit this cohort of patients meeting SSRF criteria but not undergoing surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Is surgical rib fixation in patients aged more than 65 years old associated with worse outcomes compared to younger patients? A retrospective single-center study
    Agrafiotis, Apostolos C.
    Bourlon, Lucie
    Etienne, Harry
    Le Roux, Marielle
    Mazzoni, Lucia
    Giol, Mihaela
    Debrosse, Denis
    Assouad, Jalal
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2022, 122 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [22] Paravertebral block analgesia during surgical stabilization for rib fractures patients under conscious state: a single-arm, pilot study and post-hoc analysis
    Wu, Weiming
    Gao, Xiaoyun
    Liu, Penghao
    Zhao, Weigang
    Yang, Yi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2025, 20 (01)
  • [23] Chest wall stabilization and rib fixation using a nitinol screwless system in selected patients after blunt trauma: Long-term results in a single-center experience
    Hojski, A.
    Xhambazi, A.
    Wiese, M.
    Subotic, D.
    Bachmann, H.
    Lardinois, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [24] Total Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes in Eligible Patients Versus Patients Who Failed to Meet at Least 1 Eligibility Criterion: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Gauthier, Chase W.
    Bakaes, Yianni C.
    Kern, Elizabeth M.
    Kung, Justin E.
    Hopkins, Jeffrey S.
    Hamilton, Corey A.
    Bishop, Braxton C.
    March, Kyle A.
    Jackson III, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (08):
  • [25] Comparison of Events Across Bleeding Scales in Patients Who Underwent CDT and Systemic Thrombolysis- A Single Center Retrospective Review
    Pettigrew, S.
    Chung, A.
    Alexander, K.
    Lakhter, V.
    Panaro, J.
    Weaver, S. E.
    Bashir, R.
    Criner, G. J.
    Rali, P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [26] Comparison by Magnetic Resonance Phase Contrast Imaging of Pulse-Wave Velocity in Patients With Single Ventricle Who Have Reconstructed Aortas Versus Those Without
    Fogel, Mark A.
    Li, Christine
    Nicolson, Susan C.
    Spray, Thomas L.
    Gaynor, J. William
    Fuller, Stephanie
    Keller, Marc S.
    Harris, Matthew A.
    Yoganathan, Ajit P.
    Whitehead, Kevin K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 114 (12): : 1902 - 1907
  • [27] Comparison of the surgical outcomes and couples' satisfaction with the type of penile prosthesis; Malleable versus Inflatable penile prosthesis: From 157 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation in single center
    Kim, Y. U.
    Choi, J. Y.
    Ko, Y. H.
    Song, P. H.
    Moon, K. H.
    Jung, H. C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S677 - S678
  • [28] Who is eligible for randomized trials? A comparison between the exclusion criteria defined by the ISCHEMIA trial and 3102 real-world patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing stent implantation in a single cardiology center
    Jarosław Wasilewski
    Lech Poloński
    Andrzej Lekston
    Tadeusz Osadnik
    Rafał Reguła
    Kamil Bujak
    Anna Kurek
    Trials, 16
  • [29] Who is eligible for randomized trials? A comparison between the exclusion criteria defined by the ISCHEMIA trial and 3102 real-world patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing stent implantation in a single cardiology center
    Wasilewski, Jaroslaw
    Polonski, Lech
    Lekston, Andrzej
    Osadnik, Tadeusz
    Regula, Rafal
    Bujak, Kamil
    Kurek, Anna
    TRIALS, 2015, 16