Comparison of local minocycline hydrochloride delivery and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as adjuncts to mechanical debridement for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Almubarak, Abdulrahman M. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Periodont & Community Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy; Mechanical debridement; Minocycline hydrochloride; Peri-implant mucositis; Probing depth; CLINICAL-EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104461
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim was to compare the efficacy of local minocycline hydrochloride delivery (LMHD) and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as adjuncts to mechanical debridement (MD) for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PM). Methods: Patients with PM were included. The following information was retrieved from patients' digital dental records: (a) age, (b) gender, (c) duration of implants in function, (d) number of implants, (e) depth of implant placement, and (f) mode of prosthesis retention. Information related to daily toothbrushing and flossing of interproximal spaces and the most recent visit to an oral healthcare provider was also recorded. Participants were randomly divided into three groups as follows: (a) MD + LMHD; (b) MD + aPDT, and (c) MD alone. Peri-implant modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI) and probing depth (PD) were measured at baseline and at 45 days follow-up. Peri-implant crestal bone levels were measured at baseline. Group comparisons were done using One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post-hoc adjustment tests. The correlation between peri-implant clinical parameters and age, gender, and duration of implants in function was assessed using linear regression analysis. Level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Twenty-two and 22 patients underwent MD with adjunct LMDH and aPDT, respectively. Twenty-two participants underwent MD alone. There was no difference in the mean ages of all individuals. At baseline, there was no difference in mPI, mGI and PD in all groups. At follow-up, mPI (P < 0.05), mGI (P < 0.05) and PD (P <0.05) were higher among patients who underwent MD alone than individuals who received LMHD or aPDT as adjuncts to MD. There was no difference in mPI, mGI, and PD among individuals who underwent LMHD and aPDT as adjuvants to MD. Conclusion: In the short term, MD with adjunct LMHD or aPDT is effective for managing PM.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Techniques for the Management of Dental Implant Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gupta, Bharti
    Gupta, Shekhar
    Divya, Divya
    Dev, Shruti Vishal
    Bhola, Surabhi
    Guruprasad, Yadavalli
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S865 - S867
  • [32] Role of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in reducing subgingival oral yeasts colonization in patients with peri-implant mucositis
    Shetty, BharathRaj
    Ali, Dena
    Ahmed, Saeeda
    Ibraheem, Wael Ibraheem
    Preethanath, S.
    Vellappally, Sajith
    Divakar, Darshan Devang
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2022, 38
  • [33] Topical minocycline microspheres versus topical chlorhexidine gel as an adjunct to mechanical debridement of incipient peri-implant infections:: a randomized clinical trial
    Renvert, S
    Lessem, J
    Dahlén, G
    Lindahl, C
    Svensson, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 33 (05) : 362 - 369
  • [34] Treatment of peri-implant mucositis with a chitosan brush-A pilot randomized clinical trial
    Wohlfahrt, Johan Caspar
    Aass, Anne M.
    Koldsland, Odd C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE, 2019, 17 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [35] Efficacy of mechanical debridement with adjunctive probiotic therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis in cigarette-smokers and never-smokers
    Alqahtani, Fawaz
    Alqahtani, Mana
    Shafqat, Syed S.
    Akram, Zohaib
    Al-Kheraif, Abdulaziz A.
    Javed, Fawad
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (04) : 734 - 740
  • [36] Treatment of peri-implant mucositis using an Er:YAG laser or an ultrasonic device: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Bentsson, Viveca Wallin
    Aoki, Akira
    Mizutani, Koji
    Lindahl, Christel
    Renvert, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [37] Effectiveness of mechanical debridement with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic for treating peri-implant mucositis among prediabetic cigarette-smokers and non-smokers
    Al Hafez, Ahmed Saleh Saeed
    Ingle, Navin
    Alshayeb, Alathra Abdullah
    Tashery, Hamed Mohammad
    Alqarni, Abdulrahman Abdullah Mohammad
    Alshamrani, Salma Hamed
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2020, 31
  • [38] Anti-infective treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a randomised controlled clinical trial
    Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A.
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Botticelli, Daniele
    Mombelli, Andrea
    Faddy, Malcolm
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) : 237 - 241
  • [39] Photodynamic therapy for the treatment of peri-implant diseases: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sivaramakrishnan, Gowri
    Sridharan, Kannan
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2018, 21 : 1 - 9