Edge AI Solutions for Spacecraft Failure Management

被引:0
|
作者
Ales, Filippo [1 ]
Krstova, Alisa [1 ]
Chabot, Thomas [1 ]
Ghiglione, Max [4 ]
de Lera, Mario Castro [1 ]
Hegwein, Florian [1 ]
Koch, Andreas [1 ]
Garcia, Carlos Hervas [1 ]
Harikrishnan, Prem [2 ]
Mallah, Maen [3 ]
Ali, Rashid [3 ]
Rothe, Michael [3 ]
Hili, Laurent [4 ]
机构
[1] Airbus Def & Space GmbH, Claude Dornier Str, D-88090 Immenstaad, Germany
[2] EVOLEO Technol GmbH, Freibadstr 30, D-81543 Munich, Germany
[3] Fraunhofer Inst Integrated Circuits IIS, Wolfsmantel 33, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[4] European Space Agcy, European Space Res & Technol Ctr ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1,Postbus 299, NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, Netherlands
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Failure Detection; Isolation and Recovery;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-60408-9_20
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The primary goal of Spacecraft Failure Detection, Isolation, and Recovery (FDIR) is to ensure the reliability, availability, maintainability, and operational autonomy of missions, thus securing their success even in the face of potential failures. Traditional FDIR approaches mandate the identification of all potential failure scenarios during the spacecraft's design phase, which often leads to substantial development and operational costs associated with resolving unanticipated inorbit anomalies. Therefore, it can be more cost-effective to employ an on-board system capable of learning from telemetry data, enabling it to perform monitoring tasks with minimal prior knowledge of expected failures. While numerous strategies for detecting failures and anomalies in time series data have been developed and utilized in various missions, the increasing complexity of modern spacecraft presents ongoing challenges for both ground-based and on-board smart anomaly detection. A significant constraint is the limited hardware and computational resources, with processors like LEON IV and space-qualified FPGAs offering far less computing power compared to contemporary GPUs. Consequently, it becomes essential to adapt these techniques. This study offers an initial evaluation of the performance of diverse machine learning methods in identifying different failure scenarios. It also highlights the specific intricacies and obstacles involved in implementing these techniques on board a spacecraft.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 473
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] National Sports AI Health Management Service System Based on Edge Computing
    Yang, Huali
    Han, Xiaowei
    WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING, 2021, 2021
  • [22] Integration of AI, IoT and Edge-Computing for Smart Microgrid Energy Management
    Nammouchi, Amal
    Aupke, Phil
    Kassler, Andreas
    Theocharis, Andreas
    Raffa, Viviana
    Di Felice, Marco
    2021 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND 2021 5TH IEEE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEMS EUROPE (EEEIC/I&CPS EUROPE), 2021,
  • [23] Model-driven Cluster Resource Management for AI Workloads in Edge Clouds
    Liang, Qianlin
    Hanafy, Walid A.
    Ali-Eldin, Ahmed
    Shenoy, Prashant
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON AUTONOMOUS AND ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [24] Spacecraft edge extraction by wavelet transformation
    Kojima, Hirohisa
    Usuda, Yutaka
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2005, VOL 123, PTS 1-3, 2006, 123 : 901 - +
  • [25] AI-EDGE: An NSF AI institute for future edge networks and distributed intelligence
    Ju, Peizhong
    Li, Chengzhang
    Liang, Yingbin
    Shroff, Ness
    AI MAGAZINE, 2024, 45 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [26] Revolutionizing Heart Care: The Ai Wave In Heart Failure Diagnosis And Management
    Younis, Ahmad
    Albdour, Karam
    Jaber, Kamel
    Ismail, Omar
    Turk, Ahmad
    Afzal, Aasim
    Scott, The heart hospital baylor
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [27] Resource management of IoT edge devices: Challenges, techniques, and solutions
    Kumar, Neeraj
    Jindal, Anish
    Villari, Massimo
    Srirama, Satish Narayana
    SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2021, 51 (12): : 2357 - 2359
  • [28] Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Neurosurgery: Information Management and Administrative Burden Solutions
    Greisman, Jacob D.
    DiGiorgio, Anthony M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 176 : 237 - 238
  • [29] Sustainable AI Processing at the Edge
    Ollivier, Sebastien
    Li, Sheng
    Tang, Yue
    Cahoon, Stephen
    Caginalp, Ryan
    Chaudhuri, Chayanika
    Zhou, Peipei
    Tang, Xulong
    Hu, Jingtong
    Jones, Alex K.
    IEEE MICRO, 2023, 43 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [30] Techology Trend of Edge AI
    Lee, Yen-Lin
    Tsung, Pei-Kuei
    Wu, Max
    2018 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON VLSI DESIGN, AUTOMATION AND TEST (VLSI-DAT), 2018,