Research on improving injection and production gas capacity based on integrated reservoir-well coupling model for gas storage

被引:0
|
作者
Fu, Yu [1 ]
Yuan, Ganlin [1 ]
Xia, Yong [2 ]
Wang, Mingwei [1 ]
Zhang, Yunjun [1 ]
Yang, Xufeng [1 ]
Wang, Zibo [1 ]
Cheng, Yuxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Oil & Nat Gas Engn, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
[2] Changqing Oilfield Co, Res Inst Petr Explorat & Dev, CNPC, Xian 710018, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gas storage; Injection and production capability; Gas reservoir; wellbore coupling; Gas water two-phase flow; Numerical simulation; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135018
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Underground gas storage facilities, used for natural gas storage and peak shaving, are increasingly important for natural gas production and balancing supply and demand. During operation, the working gas recovery volume is a key indicator of peak shaving capacity and operational efficiency. This study performed secondary development on the reservoir geological model constructed by commercial software through the implementation of MATLAB programs. Taking the bottom hole flowing pressure as the coupling point, the numerical simulation model of the gas storage reservoir, the single well simulation model of the wellbore, and the coupling model solving process were integrated into a complete integrated coupling model of the wellbore-gas reservoir. This model integrates geological structure, lithological characteristics, fluid properties, and numerical simulation techniques. It comprehensively considers the flow characteristics of gas reservoir fluids and two-phase flow in wellbores. It can incorporate the injection and production capabilities of individual gas wells in the gas storage reservoir, as well as various stimulation measures, enabling systematic simulation and analysis of the impact of increasing the number of low-yield wells and enhancing injection volume. Separate predictions and comparisons were conducted for eight low-productivity wells, with actual and predicted production data at each production point being compared. The results indicate that the prediction accuracy is 91.3 %. For scenarios where injection and production capabilities fail to meet standards due to various factors, three feasible countermeasures-acidizing and plug removal, deep penetration perforation, and small-scale fracturing-are proposed following a comprehensive analysis. Building on the previous analysis of the primary controlling factors for low production, in-depth investigations into acid fracturing, small-scale fracturing, and deep penetration perforation were conducted for the three gas wells in the gas storage reservoir. For Well A, formation acidizing was performed, resulting in a 16.2 % increase in injection capacity and a 39.2 % increase in production capacity. For Well B, a small-scale fracturing treatment was implemented, resulting in a 30.8 % increase in injection capacity and a 76.7 % increase in production capacity. For Well C, water jet deep penetration perforation technology was employed to remove near-well formation contamination, resulting in a 13.4 % increase in injection capacity and a 25.4 % increase in production capacity. This model comprehensively considers geological structure, lithological features, and fluid properties, conducting a thorough assessment through numerical simulation technology. It thereby provides scientific support for engineering decision-making in gas storage and guides production scheduling and injection-production scheme.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk classification and control of gas-storage geological body of gas reservoir type during injection, production and operation
    Zheng Y.
    Qiu X.
    Lai X.
    Zhao Y.
    Sun J.
    Huangfu X.
    Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42 (03) : 114 - 119
  • [22] Production assessment of low production rate of well in a supergiant gas condensate reservoir: application of an integrated strategy
    Reza Azin
    Hassan Sedaghati
    Rouhollah Fatehi
    Shahriar Osfouri
    Zahra Sakhaei
    Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2019, 9 : 543 - 560
  • [23] Production assessment of low production rate of well in a supergiant gas condensate reservoir: application of an integrated strategy
    Azin, Reza
    Sedaghati, Hassan
    Fatehi, Rouhollah
    Osfouri, Shahriar
    Sakhaei, Zahra
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 9 (01) : 543 - 560
  • [24] A New Model of Fractured Horizontal Well Coupling With the Tight Gas Reservoir at Unsteady State
    Xu, M. Y.
    Liao, X. W.
    He, Y. F.
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (24) : 2604 - 2612
  • [25] Research on Prediction Model of Internal Corrosion Rate in Injection and Production String of Salt Cavern Gas Storage
    Luo Z.-S.
    Ouyang C.-F.
    Wang X.-W.
    Zhang X.-S.
    Surface Technology, 2022, 51 (06): : 283 - 290
  • [26] An optimal design of completion string of an injection and production well in the Yulinnan Underground Gas Storage
    Wang, X. (wxxiong_cq@petrochina.com.cn), 1600, Natural Gas Industry Journal Agency (34):
  • [27] Research on gas injection to increase coalbed methane production based on thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling
    Yu, Hongjin
    Li, Ziwen
    Bai, Yansong
    Wang, Yinji
    Hu, Hongqing
    FUEL, 2023, 354
  • [28] Evaluation of shale gas reservoir reserves and production capacity based on Arps regression
    Lu, Ying
    Pan, Lu
    Wu, Ruidong
    Shi, Meixue
    Ma, Lian
    GEOSYSTEM ENGINEERING, 2024, 27 (03) : 87 - 99
  • [29] Improving gas production of hydrate deposits by increasing reservoir permeability nearby production well in the South China Sea
    Shen, Pengfei
    Sun, Zhongguan
    Luo, Yongjiang
    Li, Xinwang
    Xiao, Changwen
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 4416 - 4429
  • [30] Experimental and Numerical Simulation Studies on the Synergistic Design of Gas Injection and Extraction Reservoirs of Condensate Gas Reservoir-Based Underground Gas Storage
    Geng, Jie
    Zhang, Hu
    Yue, Ping
    Qu, Simin
    Wang, Mutong
    Chen, Baoxin
    PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (12)