Research on improving injection and production gas capacity based on integrated reservoir-well coupling model for gas storage

被引:0
|
作者
Fu, Yu [1 ]
Yuan, Ganlin [1 ]
Xia, Yong [2 ]
Wang, Mingwei [1 ]
Zhang, Yunjun [1 ]
Yang, Xufeng [1 ]
Wang, Zibo [1 ]
Cheng, Yuxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Oil & Nat Gas Engn, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
[2] Changqing Oilfield Co, Res Inst Petr Explorat & Dev, CNPC, Xian 710018, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gas storage; Injection and production capability; Gas reservoir; wellbore coupling; Gas water two-phase flow; Numerical simulation; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135018
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Underground gas storage facilities, used for natural gas storage and peak shaving, are increasingly important for natural gas production and balancing supply and demand. During operation, the working gas recovery volume is a key indicator of peak shaving capacity and operational efficiency. This study performed secondary development on the reservoir geological model constructed by commercial software through the implementation of MATLAB programs. Taking the bottom hole flowing pressure as the coupling point, the numerical simulation model of the gas storage reservoir, the single well simulation model of the wellbore, and the coupling model solving process were integrated into a complete integrated coupling model of the wellbore-gas reservoir. This model integrates geological structure, lithological characteristics, fluid properties, and numerical simulation techniques. It comprehensively considers the flow characteristics of gas reservoir fluids and two-phase flow in wellbores. It can incorporate the injection and production capabilities of individual gas wells in the gas storage reservoir, as well as various stimulation measures, enabling systematic simulation and analysis of the impact of increasing the number of low-yield wells and enhancing injection volume. Separate predictions and comparisons were conducted for eight low-productivity wells, with actual and predicted production data at each production point being compared. The results indicate that the prediction accuracy is 91.3 %. For scenarios where injection and production capabilities fail to meet standards due to various factors, three feasible countermeasures-acidizing and plug removal, deep penetration perforation, and small-scale fracturing-are proposed following a comprehensive analysis. Building on the previous analysis of the primary controlling factors for low production, in-depth investigations into acid fracturing, small-scale fracturing, and deep penetration perforation were conducted for the three gas wells in the gas storage reservoir. For Well A, formation acidizing was performed, resulting in a 16.2 % increase in injection capacity and a 39.2 % increase in production capacity. For Well B, a small-scale fracturing treatment was implemented, resulting in a 30.8 % increase in injection capacity and a 76.7 % increase in production capacity. For Well C, water jet deep penetration perforation technology was employed to remove near-well formation contamination, resulting in a 13.4 % increase in injection capacity and a 25.4 % increase in production capacity. This model comprehensively considers geological structure, lithological features, and fluid properties, conducting a thorough assessment through numerical simulation technology. It thereby provides scientific support for engineering decision-making in gas storage and guides production scheduling and injection-production scheme.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on Temperature-Pressure Coupling Model of Gas Storage Well during Injection Production
    Zuo, Wangyin
    Dou, Yihua
    Liu, Junyan
    Li, Lili
    Zhang, Wei
    PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [2] Optimization of the injection-production process of underground gas storage in depleted gas reservoir
    Chang, Haibin
    Duo, Tangkun
    Li, Bei
    Wen, Kai
    Meng, Tao
    Bai, Chenbing
    Zhang, Hongwei
    GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 138
  • [3] Simulation of petroleum phase behavior in injection and production process of underground gas storage in a gas reservoir
    Wang J.
    Shi L.
    Zhang Y.
    Zhang K.
    Li C.
    Chen X.
    Sun J.
    Qiu X.
    Shiyou Kantan Yu Kaifa/Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49 (06): : 1198 - 1205+1233
  • [4] Simulation of petroleum phase behavior in injection and production process of underground gas storage in a gas reservoir
    Wang Jieming
    Shi Lei
    Zhang Yu
    Zhang Ke
    Li Chun
    Chen Xianxue
    Sun Junchang
    Qiu Xiaosong
    PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 49 (06) : 1386 - 1397
  • [5] Experimental research on capacity expansion simulation of multi-cycle injection-production in reconstruction of oil reservoir to underground gas storage
    Zhang, Guangdong
    Yang, Sen
    Mo, Chaoping
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2022, 54
  • [6] Numerical Simulation of Critical Production Pressure Drop of Injection and Production Wells in Gas Storage Based on Gas-Solid Coupling
    Sui, Yiyong
    Luo, Mengying
    Lin, Tangmao
    Liu, Guihua
    Zhao, Yuan
    Wu, Yazhou
    Ren, Lanqing
    SEPARATIONS, 2022, 9 (10)
  • [7] Analysis of depleted gas reservoir underground gas storage wellbore integrity change during gas injection and production processes
    Wang, Rui
    Yan, Yifei
    Liu, Yifan
    Kuru, Ergun
    Liu, Minggang
    Yan, Xiangzhen
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 215
  • [8] A cyclic steam injection model for gas production from a hydrate reservoir
    Ceyhan, N
    Parlaktuna, M
    ENERGY SOURCES, 2001, 23 (05): : 437 - 447
  • [9] A coupling flow model for fractured horizontal well and anisotropic tight gas reservoir
    Lian, P. Q.
    Ma, C. Y.
    Duan, T. Z.
    Zhao, H. W.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (04) : 1873 - 1883
  • [10] A coupling flow model for fractured horizontal well and anisotropic tight gas reservoir
    P. Q. Lian
    C. Y. Ma
    T. Z. Duan
    H. W. Zhao
    Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production, 2021, 11 : 1873 - 1883